Cargando…

The burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Canada: perspectives of physicians and patients

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common problem and we sought to examine the burden of disease and its management in Canada from the perspectives of patients and physicians. METHODS: Two parallel, Canadawide structured telephone interviews surveyed 1,001 AR patients and 160 physicians in July...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keith, Paul K, Desrosiers, Martin, Laister, Tina, Schellenberg, R Robert, Waserman, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3490734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22656186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1710-1492-8-7
_version_ 1782248860289073152
author Keith, Paul K
Desrosiers, Martin
Laister, Tina
Schellenberg, R Robert
Waserman, Susan
author_facet Keith, Paul K
Desrosiers, Martin
Laister, Tina
Schellenberg, R Robert
Waserman, Susan
author_sort Keith, Paul K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common problem and we sought to examine the burden of disease and its management in Canada from the perspectives of patients and physicians. METHODS: Two parallel, Canadawide structured telephone interviews surveyed 1,001 AR patients and 160 physicians in July 2006. RESULTS: 44% of patients had experienced nasal symptoms unrelated to a cold and 20% had a physician diagnosis of AR. At screening 27% reported asthma, 15% chronic or recurrent sinusitis and 5% nasal polyps. With attacks nasal congestion and runny nose were the most bothersome symptoms. Other problems experienced were fatigue (46%), poor concentration (32%), and reduced productivity (23%). Most (77%) had not seen a physician in the past year. Physicians estimated they prescribed intranasal cortico steroids (INCS) to most AR patients (77%) consistent with guidelines but only 19% of patients had used one in the last month. Only 48% of patients were very satisfied with their current INCS. 41% of AR patients reported discontinuing their INCS with the most common reason being a perceived lack of long-lasting symptom relief (44%). 52% of patients felt that their current INCS lost effectiveness over 24 h. The most common INCS side effects included dripping down the throat, bad taste, and dryness. Most AR patients reported lifestyle limitations despite treatment (66%). 61% of patients felt that their symptoms were only somewhat controlled or poorly/not controlled during their worst month in the past year. CONCLUSIONS: AR symptoms are common and many patients experience inadequate control. Physicians report they commonly prescribe intranasal corticosteroids, but patient’s perceived loss of efficacy and side effects lead to their discontinuation. Persistent relief of allergic rhinitis symptoms remains a major unmet need. Better treatments and education are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3490734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34907342012-11-07 The burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Canada: perspectives of physicians and patients Keith, Paul K Desrosiers, Martin Laister, Tina Schellenberg, R Robert Waserman, Susan Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol Research BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common problem and we sought to examine the burden of disease and its management in Canada from the perspectives of patients and physicians. METHODS: Two parallel, Canadawide structured telephone interviews surveyed 1,001 AR patients and 160 physicians in July 2006. RESULTS: 44% of patients had experienced nasal symptoms unrelated to a cold and 20% had a physician diagnosis of AR. At screening 27% reported asthma, 15% chronic or recurrent sinusitis and 5% nasal polyps. With attacks nasal congestion and runny nose were the most bothersome symptoms. Other problems experienced were fatigue (46%), poor concentration (32%), and reduced productivity (23%). Most (77%) had not seen a physician in the past year. Physicians estimated they prescribed intranasal cortico steroids (INCS) to most AR patients (77%) consistent with guidelines but only 19% of patients had used one in the last month. Only 48% of patients were very satisfied with their current INCS. 41% of AR patients reported discontinuing their INCS with the most common reason being a perceived lack of long-lasting symptom relief (44%). 52% of patients felt that their current INCS lost effectiveness over 24 h. The most common INCS side effects included dripping down the throat, bad taste, and dryness. Most AR patients reported lifestyle limitations despite treatment (66%). 61% of patients felt that their symptoms were only somewhat controlled or poorly/not controlled during their worst month in the past year. CONCLUSIONS: AR symptoms are common and many patients experience inadequate control. Physicians report they commonly prescribe intranasal corticosteroids, but patient’s perceived loss of efficacy and side effects lead to their discontinuation. Persistent relief of allergic rhinitis symptoms remains a major unmet need. Better treatments and education are required. BioMed Central 2012-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3490734/ /pubmed/22656186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1710-1492-8-7 Text en Copyright ©2012 Keith et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Keith, Paul K
Desrosiers, Martin
Laister, Tina
Schellenberg, R Robert
Waserman, Susan
The burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Canada: perspectives of physicians and patients
title The burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Canada: perspectives of physicians and patients
title_full The burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Canada: perspectives of physicians and patients
title_fullStr The burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Canada: perspectives of physicians and patients
title_full_unstemmed The burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Canada: perspectives of physicians and patients
title_short The burden of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Canada: perspectives of physicians and patients
title_sort burden of allergic rhinitis (ar) in canada: perspectives of physicians and patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3490734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22656186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1710-1492-8-7
work_keys_str_mv AT keithpaulk theburdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT desrosiersmartin theburdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT laistertina theburdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT schellenbergrrobert theburdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT wasermansusan theburdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT keithpaulk burdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT desrosiersmartin burdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT laistertina burdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT schellenbergrrobert burdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients
AT wasermansusan burdenofallergicrhinitisarincanadaperspectivesofphysiciansandpatients