Cargando…
Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study
BACKGROUND: The inactivity physiology paradigm proposes that sedentary behaviors, including sitting too much, are independent of the type of physical activity delineated for health in the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Thus, we hypothesized that, when accounting for behaviors across the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3490758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23034100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-122 |
_version_ | 1782248865807728640 |
---|---|
author | Craft, Lynette L Zderic, Theodore W Gapstur, Susan M VanIterson, Erik H Thomas, Danielle M Siddique, Juned Hamilton, Marc T |
author_facet | Craft, Lynette L Zderic, Theodore W Gapstur, Susan M VanIterson, Erik H Thomas, Danielle M Siddique, Juned Hamilton, Marc T |
author_sort | Craft, Lynette L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The inactivity physiology paradigm proposes that sedentary behaviors, including sitting too much, are independent of the type of physical activity delineated for health in the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Thus, we hypothesized that, when accounting for behaviors across the entire day, variability in the amount of time spent sitting would be independent of the inter-and intra-individual time engaged in sustained moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). METHODS: Ninety-one healthy women, aged 40–75 years, completed a demographic questionnaire and assessment of height and weight. Participants wore the activPAL activity monitor for one week and time (minutes/day) spent sitting, standing, stepping, and in sustained bouts (bouts ≥10 minutes) of MVPA were quantified. The women were then stratified into groups based on weekly sustained MVPA. Additionally, each day of data collection for each participant was classified as either a “sufficient” MVPA day (≥ 30 min of MVPA) or an “insufficient” MVPA day for within-participant analyses. RESULTS: Time spent sitting, standing, and in incidental non-exercise stepping averaged 64, 28, and 11 hrs/week, respectively, and did not differ between groups with individuals meeting/exceeding the current exercise recommendation of 150 min/week of sustained MVPA in ≥10 minutes bouts (M = 294 min/week, SD = 22) compared to those with none or minimal levels (M= 20min/week, SD = 4). Time spent sitting (M = 9.1 hr/day, SD = 0.19 vs. M = 8.8 hr/day, SD = 0.22), standing (M = 3.9 hr/day, SD = 0.16 vs. M = 3.9 hr/day, SD = 0.15), and in intermittent stepping (M = 1.6 hr/day, SD = 0.07 vs. M = 1.6 hr/day, SD = 0.06) did not differ between days with (~55 min/day) and without recommended MVPA. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first objective evidence that participation in sustained MVPA is unrelated to daily sitting duration in relatively healthy, middle and older-aged women. More research is needed to extend these findings to other populations and to inform distinct behavioral recommendations focused on sedentary time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3490758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34907582012-11-07 Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study Craft, Lynette L Zderic, Theodore W Gapstur, Susan M VanIterson, Erik H Thomas, Danielle M Siddique, Juned Hamilton, Marc T Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: The inactivity physiology paradigm proposes that sedentary behaviors, including sitting too much, are independent of the type of physical activity delineated for health in the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Thus, we hypothesized that, when accounting for behaviors across the entire day, variability in the amount of time spent sitting would be independent of the inter-and intra-individual time engaged in sustained moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). METHODS: Ninety-one healthy women, aged 40–75 years, completed a demographic questionnaire and assessment of height and weight. Participants wore the activPAL activity monitor for one week and time (minutes/day) spent sitting, standing, stepping, and in sustained bouts (bouts ≥10 minutes) of MVPA were quantified. The women were then stratified into groups based on weekly sustained MVPA. Additionally, each day of data collection for each participant was classified as either a “sufficient” MVPA day (≥ 30 min of MVPA) or an “insufficient” MVPA day for within-participant analyses. RESULTS: Time spent sitting, standing, and in incidental non-exercise stepping averaged 64, 28, and 11 hrs/week, respectively, and did not differ between groups with individuals meeting/exceeding the current exercise recommendation of 150 min/week of sustained MVPA in ≥10 minutes bouts (M = 294 min/week, SD = 22) compared to those with none or minimal levels (M= 20min/week, SD = 4). Time spent sitting (M = 9.1 hr/day, SD = 0.19 vs. M = 8.8 hr/day, SD = 0.22), standing (M = 3.9 hr/day, SD = 0.16 vs. M = 3.9 hr/day, SD = 0.15), and in intermittent stepping (M = 1.6 hr/day, SD = 0.07 vs. M = 1.6 hr/day, SD = 0.06) did not differ between days with (~55 min/day) and without recommended MVPA. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first objective evidence that participation in sustained MVPA is unrelated to daily sitting duration in relatively healthy, middle and older-aged women. More research is needed to extend these findings to other populations and to inform distinct behavioral recommendations focused on sedentary time. BioMed Central 2012-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3490758/ /pubmed/23034100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-122 Text en Copyright ©2012 Craft et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Craft, Lynette L Zderic, Theodore W Gapstur, Susan M VanIterson, Erik H Thomas, Danielle M Siddique, Juned Hamilton, Marc T Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study |
title | Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study |
title_full | Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study |
title_fullStr | Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study |
title_short | Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study |
title_sort | evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: an observational inclinometry study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3490758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23034100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT craftlynettel evidencethatwomenmeetingphysicalactivityguidelinesdonotsitlessanobservationalinclinometrystudy AT zderictheodorew evidencethatwomenmeetingphysicalactivityguidelinesdonotsitlessanobservationalinclinometrystudy AT gapstursusanm evidencethatwomenmeetingphysicalactivityguidelinesdonotsitlessanobservationalinclinometrystudy AT vanitersonerikh evidencethatwomenmeetingphysicalactivityguidelinesdonotsitlessanobservationalinclinometrystudy AT thomasdaniellem evidencethatwomenmeetingphysicalactivityguidelinesdonotsitlessanobservationalinclinometrystudy AT siddiquejuned evidencethatwomenmeetingphysicalactivityguidelinesdonotsitlessanobservationalinclinometrystudy AT hamiltonmarct evidencethatwomenmeetingphysicalactivityguidelinesdonotsitlessanobservationalinclinometrystudy |