Cargando…

Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study

BACKGROUND: The inactivity physiology paradigm proposes that sedentary behaviors, including sitting too much, are independent of the type of physical activity delineated for health in the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Thus, we hypothesized that, when accounting for behaviors across the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Craft, Lynette L, Zderic, Theodore W, Gapstur, Susan M, VanIterson, Erik H, Thomas, Danielle M, Siddique, Juned, Hamilton, Marc T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3490758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23034100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-122
_version_ 1782248865807728640
author Craft, Lynette L
Zderic, Theodore W
Gapstur, Susan M
VanIterson, Erik H
Thomas, Danielle M
Siddique, Juned
Hamilton, Marc T
author_facet Craft, Lynette L
Zderic, Theodore W
Gapstur, Susan M
VanIterson, Erik H
Thomas, Danielle M
Siddique, Juned
Hamilton, Marc T
author_sort Craft, Lynette L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The inactivity physiology paradigm proposes that sedentary behaviors, including sitting too much, are independent of the type of physical activity delineated for health in the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Thus, we hypothesized that, when accounting for behaviors across the entire day, variability in the amount of time spent sitting would be independent of the inter-and intra-individual time engaged in sustained moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). METHODS: Ninety-one healthy women, aged 40–75 years, completed a demographic questionnaire and assessment of height and weight. Participants wore the activPAL activity monitor for one week and time (minutes/day) spent sitting, standing, stepping, and in sustained bouts (bouts ≥10 minutes) of MVPA were quantified. The women were then stratified into groups based on weekly sustained MVPA. Additionally, each day of data collection for each participant was classified as either a “sufficient” MVPA day (≥ 30 min of MVPA) or an “insufficient” MVPA day for within-participant analyses. RESULTS: Time spent sitting, standing, and in incidental non-exercise stepping averaged 64, 28, and 11 hrs/week, respectively, and did not differ between groups with individuals meeting/exceeding the current exercise recommendation of 150 min/week of sustained MVPA in ≥10 minutes bouts (M = 294 min/week, SD = 22) compared to those with none or minimal levels (M= 20min/week, SD = 4). Time spent sitting (M = 9.1 hr/day, SD = 0.19 vs. M = 8.8 hr/day, SD = 0.22), standing (M = 3.9 hr/day, SD = 0.16 vs. M = 3.9 hr/day, SD = 0.15), and in intermittent stepping (M = 1.6 hr/day, SD = 0.07 vs. M = 1.6 hr/day, SD = 0.06) did not differ between days with (~55 min/day) and without recommended MVPA. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first objective evidence that participation in sustained MVPA is unrelated to daily sitting duration in relatively healthy, middle and older-aged women. More research is needed to extend these findings to other populations and to inform distinct behavioral recommendations focused on sedentary time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3490758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34907582012-11-07 Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study Craft, Lynette L Zderic, Theodore W Gapstur, Susan M VanIterson, Erik H Thomas, Danielle M Siddique, Juned Hamilton, Marc T Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: The inactivity physiology paradigm proposes that sedentary behaviors, including sitting too much, are independent of the type of physical activity delineated for health in the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Thus, we hypothesized that, when accounting for behaviors across the entire day, variability in the amount of time spent sitting would be independent of the inter-and intra-individual time engaged in sustained moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). METHODS: Ninety-one healthy women, aged 40–75 years, completed a demographic questionnaire and assessment of height and weight. Participants wore the activPAL activity monitor for one week and time (minutes/day) spent sitting, standing, stepping, and in sustained bouts (bouts ≥10 minutes) of MVPA were quantified. The women were then stratified into groups based on weekly sustained MVPA. Additionally, each day of data collection for each participant was classified as either a “sufficient” MVPA day (≥ 30 min of MVPA) or an “insufficient” MVPA day for within-participant analyses. RESULTS: Time spent sitting, standing, and in incidental non-exercise stepping averaged 64, 28, and 11 hrs/week, respectively, and did not differ between groups with individuals meeting/exceeding the current exercise recommendation of 150 min/week of sustained MVPA in ≥10 minutes bouts (M = 294 min/week, SD = 22) compared to those with none or minimal levels (M= 20min/week, SD = 4). Time spent sitting (M = 9.1 hr/day, SD = 0.19 vs. M = 8.8 hr/day, SD = 0.22), standing (M = 3.9 hr/day, SD = 0.16 vs. M = 3.9 hr/day, SD = 0.15), and in intermittent stepping (M = 1.6 hr/day, SD = 0.07 vs. M = 1.6 hr/day, SD = 0.06) did not differ between days with (~55 min/day) and without recommended MVPA. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first objective evidence that participation in sustained MVPA is unrelated to daily sitting duration in relatively healthy, middle and older-aged women. More research is needed to extend these findings to other populations and to inform distinct behavioral recommendations focused on sedentary time. BioMed Central 2012-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3490758/ /pubmed/23034100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-122 Text en Copyright ©2012 Craft et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Craft, Lynette L
Zderic, Theodore W
Gapstur, Susan M
VanIterson, Erik H
Thomas, Danielle M
Siddique, Juned
Hamilton, Marc T
Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study
title Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study
title_full Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study
title_fullStr Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study
title_full_unstemmed Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study
title_short Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study
title_sort evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: an observational inclinometry study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3490758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23034100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-122
work_keys_str_mv AT craftlynettel evidencethatwomenmeetingphysicalactivityguidelinesdonotsitlessanobservationalinclinometrystudy
AT zderictheodorew evidencethatwomenmeetingphysicalactivityguidelinesdonotsitlessanobservationalinclinometrystudy
AT gapstursusanm evidencethatwomenmeetingphysicalactivityguidelinesdonotsitlessanobservationalinclinometrystudy
AT vanitersonerikh evidencethatwomenmeetingphysicalactivityguidelinesdonotsitlessanobservationalinclinometrystudy
AT thomasdaniellem evidencethatwomenmeetingphysicalactivityguidelinesdonotsitlessanobservationalinclinometrystudy
AT siddiquejuned evidencethatwomenmeetingphysicalactivityguidelinesdonotsitlessanobservationalinclinometrystudy
AT hamiltonmarct evidencethatwomenmeetingphysicalactivityguidelinesdonotsitlessanobservationalinclinometrystudy