Cargando…

Randomized controlled trial of a lay-facilitated angina management programme

AIMS: This article reports a randomized controlled trial of lay-facilitated angina management (registered trial acronym: LAMP). BACKGROUND: Previously, a nurse-facilitated angina programme was shown to reduce angina while increasing physical activity, however most people with angina do not receive a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Furze, Gill, Cox, Helen, Morton, Veronica, Chuang, Ling-Hsiang, Lewin, Robert JP, Nelson, Pauline, Carty, Richard, Norris, Heather, Patel, Nicky, Elton, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3491702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22229483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05920.x
_version_ 1782249006816034816
author Furze, Gill
Cox, Helen
Morton, Veronica
Chuang, Ling-Hsiang
Lewin, Robert JP
Nelson, Pauline
Carty, Richard
Norris, Heather
Patel, Nicky
Elton, Peter
author_facet Furze, Gill
Cox, Helen
Morton, Veronica
Chuang, Ling-Hsiang
Lewin, Robert JP
Nelson, Pauline
Carty, Richard
Norris, Heather
Patel, Nicky
Elton, Peter
author_sort Furze, Gill
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This article reports a randomized controlled trial of lay-facilitated angina management (registered trial acronym: LAMP). BACKGROUND: Previously, a nurse-facilitated angina programme was shown to reduce angina while increasing physical activity, however most people with angina do not receive a cardiac rehabilitation or self-management programme. Lay people are increasingly being trained to facilitate self-management programmes. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial comparing a lay-facilitated angina management programme with routine care from an angina nurse specialist. METHODS: Participants with new stable angina were randomized to the angina management programme (intervention: 70 participants) or advice from an angina nurse specialist (control: 72 participants). Primary outcome was angina frequency at 6 months; secondary outcomes at 3 and 6 months included: risk factors, physical functioning, anxiety, depression, angina misconceptions and cost utility. Follow-up was complete in March 2009. Analysis was by intention-to-treat; blind to group allocation. RESULTS: There was no important difference in angina frequency at 6 months. Secondary outcomes, assessed by either linear or logistic regression models, demonstrated important differences favouring the intervention group, at 3 months for: Anxiety, angina misconceptions and for exercise report; and at 6 months for: Anxiety; Depression; and angina misconceptions. The intervention was considered cost-effective. CONCLUSION: The angina management programme produced some superior benefits when compared to advice from a specialist nurse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3491702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34917022012-11-09 Randomized controlled trial of a lay-facilitated angina management programme Furze, Gill Cox, Helen Morton, Veronica Chuang, Ling-Hsiang Lewin, Robert JP Nelson, Pauline Carty, Richard Norris, Heather Patel, Nicky Elton, Peter J Adv Nurs Research Papers AIMS: This article reports a randomized controlled trial of lay-facilitated angina management (registered trial acronym: LAMP). BACKGROUND: Previously, a nurse-facilitated angina programme was shown to reduce angina while increasing physical activity, however most people with angina do not receive a cardiac rehabilitation or self-management programme. Lay people are increasingly being trained to facilitate self-management programmes. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial comparing a lay-facilitated angina management programme with routine care from an angina nurse specialist. METHODS: Participants with new stable angina were randomized to the angina management programme (intervention: 70 participants) or advice from an angina nurse specialist (control: 72 participants). Primary outcome was angina frequency at 6 months; secondary outcomes at 3 and 6 months included: risk factors, physical functioning, anxiety, depression, angina misconceptions and cost utility. Follow-up was complete in March 2009. Analysis was by intention-to-treat; blind to group allocation. RESULTS: There was no important difference in angina frequency at 6 months. Secondary outcomes, assessed by either linear or logistic regression models, demonstrated important differences favouring the intervention group, at 3 months for: Anxiety, angina misconceptions and for exercise report; and at 6 months for: Anxiety; Depression; and angina misconceptions. The intervention was considered cost-effective. CONCLUSION: The angina management programme produced some superior benefits when compared to advice from a specialist nurse. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3491702/ /pubmed/22229483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05920.x Text en © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Furze, Gill
Cox, Helen
Morton, Veronica
Chuang, Ling-Hsiang
Lewin, Robert JP
Nelson, Pauline
Carty, Richard
Norris, Heather
Patel, Nicky
Elton, Peter
Randomized controlled trial of a lay-facilitated angina management programme
title Randomized controlled trial of a lay-facilitated angina management programme
title_full Randomized controlled trial of a lay-facilitated angina management programme
title_fullStr Randomized controlled trial of a lay-facilitated angina management programme
title_full_unstemmed Randomized controlled trial of a lay-facilitated angina management programme
title_short Randomized controlled trial of a lay-facilitated angina management programme
title_sort randomized controlled trial of a lay-facilitated angina management programme
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3491702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22229483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05920.x
work_keys_str_mv AT furzegill randomizedcontrolledtrialofalayfacilitatedanginamanagementprogramme
AT coxhelen randomizedcontrolledtrialofalayfacilitatedanginamanagementprogramme
AT mortonveronica randomizedcontrolledtrialofalayfacilitatedanginamanagementprogramme
AT chuanglinghsiang randomizedcontrolledtrialofalayfacilitatedanginamanagementprogramme
AT lewinrobertjp randomizedcontrolledtrialofalayfacilitatedanginamanagementprogramme
AT nelsonpauline randomizedcontrolledtrialofalayfacilitatedanginamanagementprogramme
AT cartyrichard randomizedcontrolledtrialofalayfacilitatedanginamanagementprogramme
AT norrisheather randomizedcontrolledtrialofalayfacilitatedanginamanagementprogramme
AT patelnicky randomizedcontrolledtrialofalayfacilitatedanginamanagementprogramme
AT eltonpeter randomizedcontrolledtrialofalayfacilitatedanginamanagementprogramme