Cargando…

A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires

Physical inactivity is one of the four leading risk factors for global mortality. Accurate measurement of physical activity (PA) and in particular by physical activity questionnaires (PAQs) remains a challenge. The aim of this paper is to provide an updated systematic review of the reliability and v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Helmerhorst, Hendrik JF, Brage, Søren, Warren, Janet, Besson, Herve, Ekelund, Ulf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3492158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22938557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-103
_version_ 1782249070389100544
author Helmerhorst, Hendrik JF
Brage, Søren
Warren, Janet
Besson, Herve
Ekelund, Ulf
author_facet Helmerhorst, Hendrik JF
Brage, Søren
Warren, Janet
Besson, Herve
Ekelund, Ulf
author_sort Helmerhorst, Hendrik JF
collection PubMed
description Physical inactivity is one of the four leading risk factors for global mortality. Accurate measurement of physical activity (PA) and in particular by physical activity questionnaires (PAQs) remains a challenge. The aim of this paper is to provide an updated systematic review of the reliability and validity characteristics of existing and more recently developed PAQs and to quantitatively compare the performance between existing and newly developed PAQs. A literature search of electronic databases was performed for studies assessing reliability and validity data of PAQs using an objective criterion measurement of PA between January 1997 and December 2011. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were screened and data were extracted to provide a systematic overview of measurement properties. Due to differences in reported outcomes and criterion methods a quantitative meta-analysis was not possible. In total, 31 studies testing 34 newly developed PAQs, and 65 studies examining 96 existing PAQs were included. Very few PAQs showed good results on both reliability and validity. Median reliability correlation coefficients were 0.62–0.71 for existing, and 0.74–0.76 for new PAQs. Median validity coefficients ranged from 0.30–0.39 for existing, and from 0.25–0.41 for new PAQs. Although the majority of PAQs appear to have acceptable reliability, the validity is moderate at best. Newly developed PAQs do not appear to perform substantially better than existing PAQs in terms of reliability and validity. Future PAQ studies should include measures of absolute validity and the error structure of the instrument.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3492158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34921582012-11-08 A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires Helmerhorst, Hendrik JF Brage, Søren Warren, Janet Besson, Herve Ekelund, Ulf Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Review Physical inactivity is one of the four leading risk factors for global mortality. Accurate measurement of physical activity (PA) and in particular by physical activity questionnaires (PAQs) remains a challenge. The aim of this paper is to provide an updated systematic review of the reliability and validity characteristics of existing and more recently developed PAQs and to quantitatively compare the performance between existing and newly developed PAQs. A literature search of electronic databases was performed for studies assessing reliability and validity data of PAQs using an objective criterion measurement of PA between January 1997 and December 2011. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were screened and data were extracted to provide a systematic overview of measurement properties. Due to differences in reported outcomes and criterion methods a quantitative meta-analysis was not possible. In total, 31 studies testing 34 newly developed PAQs, and 65 studies examining 96 existing PAQs were included. Very few PAQs showed good results on both reliability and validity. Median reliability correlation coefficients were 0.62–0.71 for existing, and 0.74–0.76 for new PAQs. Median validity coefficients ranged from 0.30–0.39 for existing, and from 0.25–0.41 for new PAQs. Although the majority of PAQs appear to have acceptable reliability, the validity is moderate at best. Newly developed PAQs do not appear to perform substantially better than existing PAQs in terms of reliability and validity. Future PAQ studies should include measures of absolute validity and the error structure of the instrument. BioMed Central 2012-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3492158/ /pubmed/22938557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-103 Text en Copyright ©2012 Helmerhorst et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Helmerhorst, Hendrik JF
Brage, Søren
Warren, Janet
Besson, Herve
Ekelund, Ulf
A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
title A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
title_full A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
title_fullStr A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
title_short A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
title_sort systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3492158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22938557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-103
work_keys_str_mv AT helmerhorsthendrikjf asystematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT bragesøren asystematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT warrenjanet asystematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT bessonherve asystematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT ekelundulf asystematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT helmerhorsthendrikjf systematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT bragesøren systematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT warrenjanet systematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT bessonherve systematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires
AT ekelundulf systematicreviewofreliabilityandobjectivecriterionrelatedvalidityofphysicalactivityquestionnaires