Cargando…

Visual Diet versus Associative Learning as Mechanisms of Change in Body Size Preferences

Systematic differences between populations in their preferences for body size may arise as a result of an adaptive ‘prepared learning’ mechanism, whereby cues to health or status in the local population are internalized and affect body preferences. Alternatively, differences between populations may...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boothroyd, Lynda G., Tovée, Martin J., Pollet, Thomas V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3492445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23144929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048691
_version_ 1782249137615405056
author Boothroyd, Lynda G.
Tovée, Martin J.
Pollet, Thomas V.
author_facet Boothroyd, Lynda G.
Tovée, Martin J.
Pollet, Thomas V.
author_sort Boothroyd, Lynda G.
collection PubMed
description Systematic differences between populations in their preferences for body size may arise as a result of an adaptive ‘prepared learning’ mechanism, whereby cues to health or status in the local population are internalized and affect body preferences. Alternatively, differences between populations may reflect their ‘visual diet’ as a cognitive byproduct of mere exposure. Here we test the relative importance of these two explanations for variation in body preferences. Two studies were conducted where female observers were exposed to pictures of high or low BMI women which were either aspirational (healthy, attractive models in high status clothes) or non-aspirational (eating disordered patients in grey leotards), or to combinations thereof, in order to manipulate their body-weight preferences which were tested at baseline and at post–test. Overall, results showed good support for visual diet effects (seeing a string of small or large bodies resulted in a change from pre- to post-test whether the bodies were aspirational or not) and also some support for the associative learning explanation (exposure to aspirational images of overweight women induced a towards preferring larger bodies, even when accompanied by equal exposure to lower weight bodies in the non-aspirational category). Thus, both influences may act in parallel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3492445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34924452012-11-09 Visual Diet versus Associative Learning as Mechanisms of Change in Body Size Preferences Boothroyd, Lynda G. Tovée, Martin J. Pollet, Thomas V. PLoS One Research Article Systematic differences between populations in their preferences for body size may arise as a result of an adaptive ‘prepared learning’ mechanism, whereby cues to health or status in the local population are internalized and affect body preferences. Alternatively, differences between populations may reflect their ‘visual diet’ as a cognitive byproduct of mere exposure. Here we test the relative importance of these two explanations for variation in body preferences. Two studies were conducted where female observers were exposed to pictures of high or low BMI women which were either aspirational (healthy, attractive models in high status clothes) or non-aspirational (eating disordered patients in grey leotards), or to combinations thereof, in order to manipulate their body-weight preferences which were tested at baseline and at post–test. Overall, results showed good support for visual diet effects (seeing a string of small or large bodies resulted in a change from pre- to post-test whether the bodies were aspirational or not) and also some support for the associative learning explanation (exposure to aspirational images of overweight women induced a towards preferring larger bodies, even when accompanied by equal exposure to lower weight bodies in the non-aspirational category). Thus, both influences may act in parallel. Public Library of Science 2012-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3492445/ /pubmed/23144929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048691 Text en © 2012 Boothroyd et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Boothroyd, Lynda G.
Tovée, Martin J.
Pollet, Thomas V.
Visual Diet versus Associative Learning as Mechanisms of Change in Body Size Preferences
title Visual Diet versus Associative Learning as Mechanisms of Change in Body Size Preferences
title_full Visual Diet versus Associative Learning as Mechanisms of Change in Body Size Preferences
title_fullStr Visual Diet versus Associative Learning as Mechanisms of Change in Body Size Preferences
title_full_unstemmed Visual Diet versus Associative Learning as Mechanisms of Change in Body Size Preferences
title_short Visual Diet versus Associative Learning as Mechanisms of Change in Body Size Preferences
title_sort visual diet versus associative learning as mechanisms of change in body size preferences
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3492445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23144929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048691
work_keys_str_mv AT boothroydlyndag visualdietversusassociativelearningasmechanismsofchangeinbodysizepreferences
AT toveemartinj visualdietversusassociativelearningasmechanismsofchangeinbodysizepreferences
AT polletthomasv visualdietversusassociativelearningasmechanismsofchangeinbodysizepreferences