Cargando…
Meta-Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases
OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for the detection of liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PUBMED, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for original articles published prior to February 2012. The criteria for the inclusion of artic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3492464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23144927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048681 |
_version_ | 1782249142064513024 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Lihua Zhang, Jiuquan Zhang, Lin Bao, Jing Liu, Chen Xia, Yunbao Huang, Xuequan Wang, Jian |
author_facet | Chen, Lihua Zhang, Jiuquan Zhang, Lin Bao, Jing Liu, Chen Xia, Yunbao Huang, Xuequan Wang, Jian |
author_sort | Chen, Lihua |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for the detection of liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PUBMED, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for original articles published prior to February 2012. The criteria for the inclusion of articles were as follows: reported in the English language; MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA was performed to detect liver metastases; histopathologic analysis (surgery, biopsy), intraoperative observation (manual palpatation, intraoperative ultrasonography), and/or follow-up US was the reference standard; and data were sufficient for the calculation of true-positive or false-negative values. The methodological quality was assessed by using the quality assessment of diagnostic studies instrument. The data were extracted to calculate sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, diagnostic odds ratio, and areas under hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curve to perform heterogeneity test and threshold effect test, as well as publication bias analysis and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: From 229 citations, 13 were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 1900 lesions. We detected heterogeneity between studies and evidence of publication bias. The methodological quality was moderate. The pooled weighted sensitivity with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90, 0. 95), the specificity was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.97), the positive likelihood ratio was 18.07 (95% CI: 10.52, 31.04), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.07 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.10), and the diagnostic odds ratio was 249.81 (95% CI: 125.12, 498.74). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.99). CONCLUSION: MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA is a reliable, non-invasive, and no-radiation-exposure imaging modality with a high sensitivity and specificity for detection of liver metastases. Nonetheless, it should be applied cautiously, and large scale, well-designed trials are necessary to assess its clinical value. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3492464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34924642012-11-09 Meta-Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases Chen, Lihua Zhang, Jiuquan Zhang, Lin Bao, Jing Liu, Chen Xia, Yunbao Huang, Xuequan Wang, Jian PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for the detection of liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PUBMED, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for original articles published prior to February 2012. The criteria for the inclusion of articles were as follows: reported in the English language; MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA was performed to detect liver metastases; histopathologic analysis (surgery, biopsy), intraoperative observation (manual palpatation, intraoperative ultrasonography), and/or follow-up US was the reference standard; and data were sufficient for the calculation of true-positive or false-negative values. The methodological quality was assessed by using the quality assessment of diagnostic studies instrument. The data were extracted to calculate sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, diagnostic odds ratio, and areas under hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curve to perform heterogeneity test and threshold effect test, as well as publication bias analysis and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: From 229 citations, 13 were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 1900 lesions. We detected heterogeneity between studies and evidence of publication bias. The methodological quality was moderate. The pooled weighted sensitivity with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90, 0. 95), the specificity was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.97), the positive likelihood ratio was 18.07 (95% CI: 10.52, 31.04), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.07 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.10), and the diagnostic odds ratio was 249.81 (95% CI: 125.12, 498.74). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.99). CONCLUSION: MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA is a reliable, non-invasive, and no-radiation-exposure imaging modality with a high sensitivity and specificity for detection of liver metastases. Nonetheless, it should be applied cautiously, and large scale, well-designed trials are necessary to assess its clinical value. Public Library of Science 2012-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3492464/ /pubmed/23144927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048681 Text en © 2012 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chen, Lihua Zhang, Jiuquan Zhang, Lin Bao, Jing Liu, Chen Xia, Yunbao Huang, Xuequan Wang, Jian Meta-Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases |
title | Meta-Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases |
title_full | Meta-Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases |
title_fullStr | Meta-Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta-Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases |
title_short | Meta-Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases |
title_sort | meta-analysis of gadoxetic acid disodium (gd-eob-dtpa)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of liver metastases |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3492464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23144927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048681 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenlihua metaanalysisofgadoxeticaciddisodiumgdeobdtpaenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionoflivermetastases AT zhangjiuquan metaanalysisofgadoxeticaciddisodiumgdeobdtpaenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionoflivermetastases AT zhanglin metaanalysisofgadoxeticaciddisodiumgdeobdtpaenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionoflivermetastases AT baojing metaanalysisofgadoxeticaciddisodiumgdeobdtpaenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionoflivermetastases AT liuchen metaanalysisofgadoxeticaciddisodiumgdeobdtpaenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionoflivermetastases AT xiayunbao metaanalysisofgadoxeticaciddisodiumgdeobdtpaenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionoflivermetastases AT huangxuequan metaanalysisofgadoxeticaciddisodiumgdeobdtpaenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionoflivermetastases AT wangjian metaanalysisofgadoxeticaciddisodiumgdeobdtpaenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionoflivermetastases |