Cargando…

Meta-Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for the detection of liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PUBMED, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for original articles published prior to February 2012. The criteria for the inclusion of artic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Lihua, Zhang, Jiuquan, Zhang, Lin, Bao, Jing, Liu, Chen, Xia, Yunbao, Huang, Xuequan, Wang, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3492464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23144927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048681
_version_ 1782249142064513024
author Chen, Lihua
Zhang, Jiuquan
Zhang, Lin
Bao, Jing
Liu, Chen
Xia, Yunbao
Huang, Xuequan
Wang, Jian
author_facet Chen, Lihua
Zhang, Jiuquan
Zhang, Lin
Bao, Jing
Liu, Chen
Xia, Yunbao
Huang, Xuequan
Wang, Jian
author_sort Chen, Lihua
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for the detection of liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PUBMED, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for original articles published prior to February 2012. The criteria for the inclusion of articles were as follows: reported in the English language; MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA was performed to detect liver metastases; histopathologic analysis (surgery, biopsy), intraoperative observation (manual palpatation, intraoperative ultrasonography), and/or follow-up US was the reference standard; and data were sufficient for the calculation of true-positive or false-negative values. The methodological quality was assessed by using the quality assessment of diagnostic studies instrument. The data were extracted to calculate sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, diagnostic odds ratio, and areas under hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curve to perform heterogeneity test and threshold effect test, as well as publication bias analysis and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: From 229 citations, 13 were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 1900 lesions. We detected heterogeneity between studies and evidence of publication bias. The methodological quality was moderate. The pooled weighted sensitivity with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90, 0. 95), the specificity was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.97), the positive likelihood ratio was 18.07 (95% CI: 10.52, 31.04), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.07 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.10), and the diagnostic odds ratio was 249.81 (95% CI: 125.12, 498.74). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.99). CONCLUSION: MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA is a reliable, non-invasive, and no-radiation-exposure imaging modality with a high sensitivity and specificity for detection of liver metastases. Nonetheless, it should be applied cautiously, and large scale, well-designed trials are necessary to assess its clinical value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3492464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34924642012-11-09 Meta-Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases Chen, Lihua Zhang, Jiuquan Zhang, Lin Bao, Jing Liu, Chen Xia, Yunbao Huang, Xuequan Wang, Jian PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for the detection of liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PUBMED, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for original articles published prior to February 2012. The criteria for the inclusion of articles were as follows: reported in the English language; MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA was performed to detect liver metastases; histopathologic analysis (surgery, biopsy), intraoperative observation (manual palpatation, intraoperative ultrasonography), and/or follow-up US was the reference standard; and data were sufficient for the calculation of true-positive or false-negative values. The methodological quality was assessed by using the quality assessment of diagnostic studies instrument. The data were extracted to calculate sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, diagnostic odds ratio, and areas under hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curve to perform heterogeneity test and threshold effect test, as well as publication bias analysis and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: From 229 citations, 13 were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 1900 lesions. We detected heterogeneity between studies and evidence of publication bias. The methodological quality was moderate. The pooled weighted sensitivity with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90, 0. 95), the specificity was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.97), the positive likelihood ratio was 18.07 (95% CI: 10.52, 31.04), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.07 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.10), and the diagnostic odds ratio was 249.81 (95% CI: 125.12, 498.74). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.99). CONCLUSION: MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA is a reliable, non-invasive, and no-radiation-exposure imaging modality with a high sensitivity and specificity for detection of liver metastases. Nonetheless, it should be applied cautiously, and large scale, well-designed trials are necessary to assess its clinical value. Public Library of Science 2012-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3492464/ /pubmed/23144927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048681 Text en © 2012 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Lihua
Zhang, Jiuquan
Zhang, Lin
Bao, Jing
Liu, Chen
Xia, Yunbao
Huang, Xuequan
Wang, Jian
Meta-Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases
title Meta-Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases
title_full Meta-Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases
title_fullStr Meta-Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases
title_full_unstemmed Meta-Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases
title_short Meta-Analysis of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Liver Metastases
title_sort meta-analysis of gadoxetic acid disodium (gd-eob-dtpa)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of liver metastases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3492464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23144927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048681
work_keys_str_mv AT chenlihua metaanalysisofgadoxeticaciddisodiumgdeobdtpaenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionoflivermetastases
AT zhangjiuquan metaanalysisofgadoxeticaciddisodiumgdeobdtpaenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionoflivermetastases
AT zhanglin metaanalysisofgadoxeticaciddisodiumgdeobdtpaenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionoflivermetastases
AT baojing metaanalysisofgadoxeticaciddisodiumgdeobdtpaenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionoflivermetastases
AT liuchen metaanalysisofgadoxeticaciddisodiumgdeobdtpaenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionoflivermetastases
AT xiayunbao metaanalysisofgadoxeticaciddisodiumgdeobdtpaenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionoflivermetastases
AT huangxuequan metaanalysisofgadoxeticaciddisodiumgdeobdtpaenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionoflivermetastases
AT wangjian metaanalysisofgadoxeticaciddisodiumgdeobdtpaenhancedmagneticresonanceimagingforthedetectionoflivermetastases