Cargando…

Cost of Atrial Fibrillation: Invasive vs Non-Invasive Management in 2012

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. It places an enormous burden on the patients, caregivers and the society at large. As a chronic illness, AF accrues significant costs related to clinical presentation, complications and loss of productivity. Novel invasive app...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khaykin, Yaariv, Shamiss, Yana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Science Publishers 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3492820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22920478
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157340312803760730
_version_ 1782249177370066944
author Khaykin, Yaariv
Shamiss, Yana
author_facet Khaykin, Yaariv
Shamiss, Yana
author_sort Khaykin, Yaariv
collection PubMed
description Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. It places an enormous burden on the patients, caregivers and the society at large. As a chronic illness, AF accrues significant costs related to clinical presentation, complications and loss of productivity. Novel invasive approaches to AF promise a cure in some patients and a significant reduction in AF burden in others, but are very expensive. This paper will address the cost of conventional and invasive strategies in AF care and will review the evidence on the comparative cost effectiveness of these approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3492820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Bentham Science Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34928202013-11-01 Cost of Atrial Fibrillation: Invasive vs Non-Invasive Management in 2012 Khaykin, Yaariv Shamiss, Yana Curr Cardiol Rev Article Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. It places an enormous burden on the patients, caregivers and the society at large. As a chronic illness, AF accrues significant costs related to clinical presentation, complications and loss of productivity. Novel invasive approaches to AF promise a cure in some patients and a significant reduction in AF burden in others, but are very expensive. This paper will address the cost of conventional and invasive strategies in AF care and will review the evidence on the comparative cost effectiveness of these approaches. Bentham Science Publishers 2012-11 2012-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3492820/ /pubmed/22920478 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157340312803760730 Text en © 2012 Bentham Science Publishers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/), which permits unrestrictive use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Khaykin, Yaariv
Shamiss, Yana
Cost of Atrial Fibrillation: Invasive vs Non-Invasive Management in 2012
title Cost of Atrial Fibrillation: Invasive vs Non-Invasive Management in 2012
title_full Cost of Atrial Fibrillation: Invasive vs Non-Invasive Management in 2012
title_fullStr Cost of Atrial Fibrillation: Invasive vs Non-Invasive Management in 2012
title_full_unstemmed Cost of Atrial Fibrillation: Invasive vs Non-Invasive Management in 2012
title_short Cost of Atrial Fibrillation: Invasive vs Non-Invasive Management in 2012
title_sort cost of atrial fibrillation: invasive vs non-invasive management in 2012
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3492820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22920478
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157340312803760730
work_keys_str_mv AT khaykinyaariv costofatrialfibrillationinvasivevsnoninvasivemanagementin2012
AT shamissyana costofatrialfibrillationinvasivevsnoninvasivemanagementin2012