Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of candesartan versus losartan in the primary preventive treatment of hypertension
BACKGROUND: Although angiotensin receptor blockers have different receptor binding properties, no comparative randomized studies with cardiovascular event endpoints have been performed for this class of drugs. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of candesartan (Ataca...
Autores principales: | Granström, Ola, Levin, Lars-Åke, Henriksson, Martin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3493257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23144565 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S35824 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Health-care costs of losartan and candesartan in the primary treatment of hypertension
por: Henriksson, M, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Effects of losartan vs candesartan in reducing cardiovascular events in the primary treatment of hypertension
por: Kjeldsen, S E, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Candesartan Therapy in Comparison to Candesartan-Amlodipine Therapy on Hypertensive Outpatients
por: Baroroh, Faridah, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Candesartan, rather than losartan, improves motor dysfunction in thioacetamide-induced chronic liver failure in rats
por: Murad, H.A., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Effects of candesartan and propranolol combination therapy versus propranolol monotherapy in reducing portal hypertension
por: Kim, Jae Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2014)