Cargando…
Treatment outcome of high-dose image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy using intra-prostate fiducial markers for localized prostate cancer at a single institute in Japan
BACKGROUND: Several studies have confirmed the advantages of delivering high doses of external beam radiotherapy to achieve optimal tumor-control outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer. We evaluated the medium-term treatment outcome after high-dose, image-guided intensity-modulated radi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3493327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22770471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-105 |
_version_ | 1782249243887534080 |
---|---|
author | Takeda, Ken Takai, Yoshihiro Narazaki, Kakutaro Mitsuya, Masatoshi Umezawa, Rei Kadoya, Noriyuki Fujita, Yukio Sugawara, Toshiyuki Kubozono, Masaki Shimizu, Eiji Abe, Keiko Shirata, Yuko Ishikawa, Yohjiro Yamamoto, Takaya Kozumi, Maiko Dobashi, Suguru Matsushita, Haruo Chida, Koichi Ishidoya, Shigeto Arai, Yoichi Jingu, Keiichi Yamada, Shogo |
author_facet | Takeda, Ken Takai, Yoshihiro Narazaki, Kakutaro Mitsuya, Masatoshi Umezawa, Rei Kadoya, Noriyuki Fujita, Yukio Sugawara, Toshiyuki Kubozono, Masaki Shimizu, Eiji Abe, Keiko Shirata, Yuko Ishikawa, Yohjiro Yamamoto, Takaya Kozumi, Maiko Dobashi, Suguru Matsushita, Haruo Chida, Koichi Ishidoya, Shigeto Arai, Yoichi Jingu, Keiichi Yamada, Shogo |
author_sort | Takeda, Ken |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several studies have confirmed the advantages of delivering high doses of external beam radiotherapy to achieve optimal tumor-control outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer. We evaluated the medium-term treatment outcome after high-dose, image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using intra-prostate fiducial markers for clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS: In total, 141 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with image-guided IMRT (76 Gy in 13 patients and 80 Gy in 128 patients) between 2003 and 2008 were enrolled in this study. The patients were classified according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-defined risk groups. Thirty-six intermediate-risk patients and 105 high-risk patients were included. Androgen-deprivation therapy was performed in 124 patients (88%) for a median of 11 months (range: 2–88 months). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse was defined according to the Phoenix-definition (i.e., an absolute nadir plus 2 ng/ml dated at the call). The 5-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival, the 5-year distant metastasis-free survival, the 5-year cause-specific survival (CSS), the 5-year overall survival (OS) outcomes and the acute and late toxicities were analyzed. The toxicity data were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. The median follow-up was 60 months. RESULTS: The 5-year PSA relapse-free survival rates were 100% for the intermediate-risk patients and 82.2% for the high-risk patients; the 5-year actuarial distant metastasis-free survival rates were 100% and 95% for the intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively; the 5-year CSS rates were 100% for both patient subsets; and the 5-year OS rates were 100% and 91.7% for the intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. The Gleason score (<8 vs. ≥8) was significant for the 5-year PSA relapse-free survival on multivariate analysis (p = 0.044). There was no grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity. The incidence of grade 2 acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were 1.4% and 8.5%, respectively. The 5-year actuarial likelihood of late grade 2–3 GI and GU toxicities were 6% and 6.3%, respectively. No grade 4 GI or GU late toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: These medium-term results demonstrate a good tolerance of high-dose image-guided IMRT. However, further follow-up is needed to confirm the long-term treatment outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3493327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34933272012-11-09 Treatment outcome of high-dose image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy using intra-prostate fiducial markers for localized prostate cancer at a single institute in Japan Takeda, Ken Takai, Yoshihiro Narazaki, Kakutaro Mitsuya, Masatoshi Umezawa, Rei Kadoya, Noriyuki Fujita, Yukio Sugawara, Toshiyuki Kubozono, Masaki Shimizu, Eiji Abe, Keiko Shirata, Yuko Ishikawa, Yohjiro Yamamoto, Takaya Kozumi, Maiko Dobashi, Suguru Matsushita, Haruo Chida, Koichi Ishidoya, Shigeto Arai, Yoichi Jingu, Keiichi Yamada, Shogo Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Several studies have confirmed the advantages of delivering high doses of external beam radiotherapy to achieve optimal tumor-control outcomes in patients with localized prostate cancer. We evaluated the medium-term treatment outcome after high-dose, image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using intra-prostate fiducial markers for clinically localized prostate cancer. METHODS: In total, 141 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with image-guided IMRT (76 Gy in 13 patients and 80 Gy in 128 patients) between 2003 and 2008 were enrolled in this study. The patients were classified according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-defined risk groups. Thirty-six intermediate-risk patients and 105 high-risk patients were included. Androgen-deprivation therapy was performed in 124 patients (88%) for a median of 11 months (range: 2–88 months). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse was defined according to the Phoenix-definition (i.e., an absolute nadir plus 2 ng/ml dated at the call). The 5-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival, the 5-year distant metastasis-free survival, the 5-year cause-specific survival (CSS), the 5-year overall survival (OS) outcomes and the acute and late toxicities were analyzed. The toxicity data were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. The median follow-up was 60 months. RESULTS: The 5-year PSA relapse-free survival rates were 100% for the intermediate-risk patients and 82.2% for the high-risk patients; the 5-year actuarial distant metastasis-free survival rates were 100% and 95% for the intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively; the 5-year CSS rates were 100% for both patient subsets; and the 5-year OS rates were 100% and 91.7% for the intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. The Gleason score (<8 vs. ≥8) was significant for the 5-year PSA relapse-free survival on multivariate analysis (p = 0.044). There was no grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity. The incidence of grade 2 acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were 1.4% and 8.5%, respectively. The 5-year actuarial likelihood of late grade 2–3 GI and GU toxicities were 6% and 6.3%, respectively. No grade 4 GI or GU late toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: These medium-term results demonstrate a good tolerance of high-dose image-guided IMRT. However, further follow-up is needed to confirm the long-term treatment outcomes. BioMed Central 2012-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3493327/ /pubmed/22770471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-105 Text en Copyright ©2012 Takeda et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Takeda, Ken Takai, Yoshihiro Narazaki, Kakutaro Mitsuya, Masatoshi Umezawa, Rei Kadoya, Noriyuki Fujita, Yukio Sugawara, Toshiyuki Kubozono, Masaki Shimizu, Eiji Abe, Keiko Shirata, Yuko Ishikawa, Yohjiro Yamamoto, Takaya Kozumi, Maiko Dobashi, Suguru Matsushita, Haruo Chida, Koichi Ishidoya, Shigeto Arai, Yoichi Jingu, Keiichi Yamada, Shogo Treatment outcome of high-dose image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy using intra-prostate fiducial markers for localized prostate cancer at a single institute in Japan |
title | Treatment outcome of high-dose image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy using intra-prostate fiducial markers for localized prostate cancer at a single institute in Japan |
title_full | Treatment outcome of high-dose image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy using intra-prostate fiducial markers for localized prostate cancer at a single institute in Japan |
title_fullStr | Treatment outcome of high-dose image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy using intra-prostate fiducial markers for localized prostate cancer at a single institute in Japan |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment outcome of high-dose image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy using intra-prostate fiducial markers for localized prostate cancer at a single institute in Japan |
title_short | Treatment outcome of high-dose image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy using intra-prostate fiducial markers for localized prostate cancer at a single institute in Japan |
title_sort | treatment outcome of high-dose image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy using intra-prostate fiducial markers for localized prostate cancer at a single institute in japan |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3493327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22770471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takedaken treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT takaiyoshihiro treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT narazakikakutaro treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT mitsuyamasatoshi treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT umezawarei treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT kadoyanoriyuki treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT fujitayukio treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT sugawaratoshiyuki treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT kubozonomasaki treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT shimizueiji treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT abekeiko treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT shiratayuko treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT ishikawayohjiro treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT yamamototakaya treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT kozumimaiko treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT dobashisuguru treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT matsushitaharuo treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT chidakoichi treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT ishidoyashigeto treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT araiyoichi treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT jingukeiichi treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan AT yamadashogo treatmentoutcomeofhighdoseimageguidedintensitymodulatedradiotherapyusingintraprostatefiducialmarkersforlocalizedprostatecanceratasingleinstituteinjapan |