Cargando…

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor and DJ-1 in gastric cancer: differences between high-incidence and low-incidence areas

BACKGROUND: There is a need for sensitive and specific blood-borne markers for the detection of gastric cancer. Raised serum macrophage inhibitory factor (MIF) levels have been proposed as a marker for gastric cancer diagnosis but, to date, studies have only encompassed patients from high-incidence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shimwell, N J, Ward, D G, Mohri, Y, Mohri, T, Pallan, L, Teng, M, Miki, Y C, Kusunoki, M, Tucker, O, Wei, W, Morse, J, Johnson, P J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3493758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22968650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.405
_version_ 1782249321084747776
author Shimwell, N J
Ward, D G
Mohri, Y
Mohri, T
Pallan, L
Teng, M
Miki, Y C
Kusunoki, M
Tucker, O
Wei, W
Morse, J
Johnson, P J
author_facet Shimwell, N J
Ward, D G
Mohri, Y
Mohri, T
Pallan, L
Teng, M
Miki, Y C
Kusunoki, M
Tucker, O
Wei, W
Morse, J
Johnson, P J
author_sort Shimwell, N J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a need for sensitive and specific blood-borne markers for the detection of gastric cancer. Raised serum macrophage inhibitory factor (MIF) levels have been proposed as a marker for gastric cancer diagnosis but, to date, studies have only encompassed patients from high-incidence areas. METHODS: We have compared the serum concentration of MIF in a large cohort of UK and Japanese gastric cancer patients, together with appropriate control subjects (age and gender matched). Carcinoembryonic antigen and H. pylori IgG were also measured, as was DJ-1, a novel candidate protein biomarker identified by analysis of gastric cancer cell line secretomes. RESULTS: Marked elevations of the serum concentration of MIF and DJ-1 were seen in Japanese patients with gastric cancer compared with Japanese controls, a trend not seen in the UK cohort. These results could not be accounted for by differences in age, disease stage or H. pylori status. CONCLUSION: In regions of high, but not low incidence of gastric cancer, both MIF and DJ-1 have elevated serum concentrations in gastric cancer patients, compared with controls. This suggests that differing mechanisms of disease pathogenesis may be at play in high- and low-incidence regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3493758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34937582013-10-23 Macrophage migration inhibitory factor and DJ-1 in gastric cancer: differences between high-incidence and low-incidence areas Shimwell, N J Ward, D G Mohri, Y Mohri, T Pallan, L Teng, M Miki, Y C Kusunoki, M Tucker, O Wei, W Morse, J Johnson, P J Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: There is a need for sensitive and specific blood-borne markers for the detection of gastric cancer. Raised serum macrophage inhibitory factor (MIF) levels have been proposed as a marker for gastric cancer diagnosis but, to date, studies have only encompassed patients from high-incidence areas. METHODS: We have compared the serum concentration of MIF in a large cohort of UK and Japanese gastric cancer patients, together with appropriate control subjects (age and gender matched). Carcinoembryonic antigen and H. pylori IgG were also measured, as was DJ-1, a novel candidate protein biomarker identified by analysis of gastric cancer cell line secretomes. RESULTS: Marked elevations of the serum concentration of MIF and DJ-1 were seen in Japanese patients with gastric cancer compared with Japanese controls, a trend not seen in the UK cohort. These results could not be accounted for by differences in age, disease stage or H. pylori status. CONCLUSION: In regions of high, but not low incidence of gastric cancer, both MIF and DJ-1 have elevated serum concentrations in gastric cancer patients, compared with controls. This suggests that differing mechanisms of disease pathogenesis may be at play in high- and low-incidence regions. Nature Publishing Group 2012-10-23 2012-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3493758/ /pubmed/22968650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.405 Text en Copyright © 2012 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Shimwell, N J
Ward, D G
Mohri, Y
Mohri, T
Pallan, L
Teng, M
Miki, Y C
Kusunoki, M
Tucker, O
Wei, W
Morse, J
Johnson, P J
Macrophage migration inhibitory factor and DJ-1 in gastric cancer: differences between high-incidence and low-incidence areas
title Macrophage migration inhibitory factor and DJ-1 in gastric cancer: differences between high-incidence and low-incidence areas
title_full Macrophage migration inhibitory factor and DJ-1 in gastric cancer: differences between high-incidence and low-incidence areas
title_fullStr Macrophage migration inhibitory factor and DJ-1 in gastric cancer: differences between high-incidence and low-incidence areas
title_full_unstemmed Macrophage migration inhibitory factor and DJ-1 in gastric cancer: differences between high-incidence and low-incidence areas
title_short Macrophage migration inhibitory factor and DJ-1 in gastric cancer: differences between high-incidence and low-incidence areas
title_sort macrophage migration inhibitory factor and dj-1 in gastric cancer: differences between high-incidence and low-incidence areas
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3493758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22968650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.405
work_keys_str_mv AT shimwellnj macrophagemigrationinhibitoryfactoranddj1ingastriccancerdifferencesbetweenhighincidenceandlowincidenceareas
AT warddg macrophagemigrationinhibitoryfactoranddj1ingastriccancerdifferencesbetweenhighincidenceandlowincidenceareas
AT mohriy macrophagemigrationinhibitoryfactoranddj1ingastriccancerdifferencesbetweenhighincidenceandlowincidenceareas
AT mohrit macrophagemigrationinhibitoryfactoranddj1ingastriccancerdifferencesbetweenhighincidenceandlowincidenceareas
AT pallanl macrophagemigrationinhibitoryfactoranddj1ingastriccancerdifferencesbetweenhighincidenceandlowincidenceareas
AT tengm macrophagemigrationinhibitoryfactoranddj1ingastriccancerdifferencesbetweenhighincidenceandlowincidenceareas
AT mikiyc macrophagemigrationinhibitoryfactoranddj1ingastriccancerdifferencesbetweenhighincidenceandlowincidenceareas
AT kusunokim macrophagemigrationinhibitoryfactoranddj1ingastriccancerdifferencesbetweenhighincidenceandlowincidenceareas
AT tuckero macrophagemigrationinhibitoryfactoranddj1ingastriccancerdifferencesbetweenhighincidenceandlowincidenceareas
AT weiw macrophagemigrationinhibitoryfactoranddj1ingastriccancerdifferencesbetweenhighincidenceandlowincidenceareas
AT morsej macrophagemigrationinhibitoryfactoranddj1ingastriccancerdifferencesbetweenhighincidenceandlowincidenceareas
AT johnsonpj macrophagemigrationinhibitoryfactoranddj1ingastriccancerdifferencesbetweenhighincidenceandlowincidenceareas