Cargando…
A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience
BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovarian syndrome is a common endocrine disorder of reproductive age women. Many controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) strategies have been offered for the treatment of patients with PCOS undergoing in vitro fertilization, but the optimal protocol is still a controversy. There i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3493833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162357 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.101019 |
_version_ | 1782249335122034688 |
---|---|
author | Kaur, Harpreet Krishna, Deepika Shetty, Nivedita Krishnan, Sandhya Srinivas, MS Rao, Kamini Arvind |
author_facet | Kaur, Harpreet Krishna, Deepika Shetty, Nivedita Krishnan, Sandhya Srinivas, MS Rao, Kamini Arvind |
author_sort | Kaur, Harpreet |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovarian syndrome is a common endocrine disorder of reproductive age women. Many controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) strategies have been offered for the treatment of patients with PCOS undergoing in vitro fertilization, but the optimal protocol is still a controversy. There is no compelling evidence for the advantage of one stimulation protocol over the other. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center prospective controlled study comparing long agonist and antagonist protocol in PCOS women. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate. Rate of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was significantly higher in the agonist group. Number of oocytes retrieved, number of follicles and peak estradiol levels were significantly more in the agonist group. CONCLUSION: The GnRH antagonist protocol is an equally effective but safer protocol in PCOS patients compared with the long agonist protocol. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3493833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34938332012-11-16 A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience Kaur, Harpreet Krishna, Deepika Shetty, Nivedita Krishnan, Sandhya Srinivas, MS Rao, Kamini Arvind J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovarian syndrome is a common endocrine disorder of reproductive age women. Many controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) strategies have been offered for the treatment of patients with PCOS undergoing in vitro fertilization, but the optimal protocol is still a controversy. There is no compelling evidence for the advantage of one stimulation protocol over the other. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center prospective controlled study comparing long agonist and antagonist protocol in PCOS women. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate. Rate of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was significantly higher in the agonist group. Number of oocytes retrieved, number of follicles and peak estradiol levels were significantly more in the agonist group. CONCLUSION: The GnRH antagonist protocol is an equally effective but safer protocol in PCOS patients compared with the long agonist protocol. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3493833/ /pubmed/23162357 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.101019 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kaur, Harpreet Krishna, Deepika Shetty, Nivedita Krishnan, Sandhya Srinivas, MS Rao, Kamini Arvind A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience |
title | A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience |
title_full | A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience |
title_fullStr | A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience |
title_short | A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience |
title_sort | prospective study of gnrh long agonist versus flexible gnrh antagonist protocol in pcos: indian experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3493833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162357 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.101019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaurharpreet aprospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience AT krishnadeepika aprospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience AT shettynivedita aprospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience AT krishnansandhya aprospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience AT srinivasms aprospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience AT raokaminiarvind aprospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience AT kaurharpreet prospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience AT krishnadeepika prospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience AT shettynivedita prospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience AT krishnansandhya prospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience AT srinivasms prospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience AT raokaminiarvind prospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience |