Cargando…

A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience

BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovarian syndrome is a common endocrine disorder of reproductive age women. Many controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) strategies have been offered for the treatment of patients with PCOS undergoing in vitro fertilization, but the optimal protocol is still a controversy. There i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaur, Harpreet, Krishna, Deepika, Shetty, Nivedita, Krishnan, Sandhya, Srinivas, MS, Rao, Kamini Arvind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3493833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162357
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.101019
_version_ 1782249335122034688
author Kaur, Harpreet
Krishna, Deepika
Shetty, Nivedita
Krishnan, Sandhya
Srinivas, MS
Rao, Kamini Arvind
author_facet Kaur, Harpreet
Krishna, Deepika
Shetty, Nivedita
Krishnan, Sandhya
Srinivas, MS
Rao, Kamini Arvind
author_sort Kaur, Harpreet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovarian syndrome is a common endocrine disorder of reproductive age women. Many controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) strategies have been offered for the treatment of patients with PCOS undergoing in vitro fertilization, but the optimal protocol is still a controversy. There is no compelling evidence for the advantage of one stimulation protocol over the other. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center prospective controlled study comparing long agonist and antagonist protocol in PCOS women. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate. Rate of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was significantly higher in the agonist group. Number of oocytes retrieved, number of follicles and peak estradiol levels were significantly more in the agonist group. CONCLUSION: The GnRH antagonist protocol is an equally effective but safer protocol in PCOS patients compared with the long agonist protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3493833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34938332012-11-16 A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience Kaur, Harpreet Krishna, Deepika Shetty, Nivedita Krishnan, Sandhya Srinivas, MS Rao, Kamini Arvind J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovarian syndrome is a common endocrine disorder of reproductive age women. Many controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) strategies have been offered for the treatment of patients with PCOS undergoing in vitro fertilization, but the optimal protocol is still a controversy. There is no compelling evidence for the advantage of one stimulation protocol over the other. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center prospective controlled study comparing long agonist and antagonist protocol in PCOS women. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate. Rate of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was significantly higher in the agonist group. Number of oocytes retrieved, number of follicles and peak estradiol levels were significantly more in the agonist group. CONCLUSION: The GnRH antagonist protocol is an equally effective but safer protocol in PCOS patients compared with the long agonist protocol. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3493833/ /pubmed/23162357 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.101019 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kaur, Harpreet
Krishna, Deepika
Shetty, Nivedita
Krishnan, Sandhya
Srinivas, MS
Rao, Kamini Arvind
A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience
title A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience
title_full A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience
title_fullStr A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience
title_full_unstemmed A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience
title_short A prospective study of GnRH long agonist versus flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS: Indian experience
title_sort prospective study of gnrh long agonist versus flexible gnrh antagonist protocol in pcos: indian experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3493833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162357
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.101019
work_keys_str_mv AT kaurharpreet aprospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience
AT krishnadeepika aprospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience
AT shettynivedita aprospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience
AT krishnansandhya aprospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience
AT srinivasms aprospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience
AT raokaminiarvind aprospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience
AT kaurharpreet prospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience
AT krishnadeepika prospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience
AT shettynivedita prospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience
AT krishnansandhya prospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience
AT srinivasms prospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience
AT raokaminiarvind prospectivestudyofgnrhlongagonistversusflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcosindianexperience