Cargando…

STR-typing of ancient skeletal remains: which multiplex-PCR kit is the best?

AIM: To comparatively test nine commercially available short tandem repeat (STR)-multiplex kits (PowerPlex 16, 16HS, ES, ESI17, ESX17, S5 [all Promega]; AmpFiSTR Identifiler, NGM and SEfiler [all Applied Biosystems]) for their efficiency and applicability to analyze ancient and thus highly degraded...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harder, Melanie, Renneberg, Rebecca, Meyer, Patrick, Krause-Kyora, Ben, von Wurmb-Schwark, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Croatian Medical Schools 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3494155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23100203
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2012.53.416
_version_ 1782249368185733120
author Harder, Melanie
Renneberg, Rebecca
Meyer, Patrick
Krause-Kyora, Ben
von Wurmb-Schwark, Nicole
author_facet Harder, Melanie
Renneberg, Rebecca
Meyer, Patrick
Krause-Kyora, Ben
von Wurmb-Schwark, Nicole
author_sort Harder, Melanie
collection PubMed
description AIM: To comparatively test nine commercially available short tandem repeat (STR)-multiplex kits (PowerPlex 16, 16HS, ES, ESI17, ESX17, S5 [all Promega]; AmpFiSTR Identifiler, NGM and SEfiler [all Applied Biosystems]) for their efficiency and applicability to analyze ancient and thus highly degraded DNA samples. METHODS: Fifteen human skeletal remains from the late medieval age were obtained and analyzed using the nine polymerase chain reaction assays with slightly modified protocols. Data were systematically compared to find the most meaningful and sensitive assay. RESULTS: The ESI, ESX, and NGM kits showed the best overall results regarding amplification success, detection rate, identification of heterozygous alleles, sex determination, and reproducibility of the obtained data. CONCLUSION: Since application of these three kits enables the employment of different primer sequences for all the investigated amplicons, a combined application is recommended for best possible and – most importantly – reliable genetic analysis of ancient skeletal material or otherwise highly degraded samples, eg, from forensic cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3494155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Croatian Medical Schools
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34941552012-11-09 STR-typing of ancient skeletal remains: which multiplex-PCR kit is the best? Harder, Melanie Renneberg, Rebecca Meyer, Patrick Krause-Kyora, Ben von Wurmb-Schwark, Nicole Croat Med J Forensic Science AIM: To comparatively test nine commercially available short tandem repeat (STR)-multiplex kits (PowerPlex 16, 16HS, ES, ESI17, ESX17, S5 [all Promega]; AmpFiSTR Identifiler, NGM and SEfiler [all Applied Biosystems]) for their efficiency and applicability to analyze ancient and thus highly degraded DNA samples. METHODS: Fifteen human skeletal remains from the late medieval age were obtained and analyzed using the nine polymerase chain reaction assays with slightly modified protocols. Data were systematically compared to find the most meaningful and sensitive assay. RESULTS: The ESI, ESX, and NGM kits showed the best overall results regarding amplification success, detection rate, identification of heterozygous alleles, sex determination, and reproducibility of the obtained data. CONCLUSION: Since application of these three kits enables the employment of different primer sequences for all the investigated amplicons, a combined application is recommended for best possible and – most importantly – reliable genetic analysis of ancient skeletal material or otherwise highly degraded samples, eg, from forensic cases. Croatian Medical Schools 2012-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3494155/ /pubmed/23100203 http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2012.53.416 Text en Copyright © 2012 by the Croatian Medical Journal. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Forensic Science
Harder, Melanie
Renneberg, Rebecca
Meyer, Patrick
Krause-Kyora, Ben
von Wurmb-Schwark, Nicole
STR-typing of ancient skeletal remains: which multiplex-PCR kit is the best?
title STR-typing of ancient skeletal remains: which multiplex-PCR kit is the best?
title_full STR-typing of ancient skeletal remains: which multiplex-PCR kit is the best?
title_fullStr STR-typing of ancient skeletal remains: which multiplex-PCR kit is the best?
title_full_unstemmed STR-typing of ancient skeletal remains: which multiplex-PCR kit is the best?
title_short STR-typing of ancient skeletal remains: which multiplex-PCR kit is the best?
title_sort str-typing of ancient skeletal remains: which multiplex-pcr kit is the best?
topic Forensic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3494155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23100203
http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2012.53.416
work_keys_str_mv AT hardermelanie strtypingofancientskeletalremainswhichmultiplexpcrkitisthebest
AT rennebergrebecca strtypingofancientskeletalremainswhichmultiplexpcrkitisthebest
AT meyerpatrick strtypingofancientskeletalremainswhichmultiplexpcrkitisthebest
AT krausekyoraben strtypingofancientskeletalremainswhichmultiplexpcrkitisthebest
AT vonwurmbschwarknicole strtypingofancientskeletalremainswhichmultiplexpcrkitisthebest