Cargando…

Preoperative Informed Consent: Is It Truly Informed?

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative informed consent is an important aspect of surgery, yet there has been no formal training regarding it in Pakistan. This study was done to assess the preoperative informed consent practice. METHODS: After taking informed permission, a questionnaire was filled in during an i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jawaid, M, Farhan, M, Masood, Z, Husnain, SMN
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3494211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23193502
_version_ 1782249374837899264
author Jawaid, M
Farhan, M
Masood, Z
Husnain, SMN
author_facet Jawaid, M
Farhan, M
Masood, Z
Husnain, SMN
author_sort Jawaid, M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pre-operative informed consent is an important aspect of surgery, yet there has been no formal training regarding it in Pakistan. This study was done to assess the preoperative informed consent practice. METHODS: After taking informed permission, a questionnaire was filled in during an interview with 350 patients, who have undergone elective surgical procedures under routine practice conditions from July to October 2010. All the patients were asked a set of standard questions which related to the information they were provided before the operation as a part of standard informed consent practice. RESULTS: Most i.e. 307 (87.7%) patients were informed about their condition but very few 12 (3.4%) were briefed regarding complications. Only 17 (4.9%) patients said they knew about the risks and complications of proposed anesthesia. One hundred thirty-eight (39.4%) patients said that they were allowed to ask questions while giving consent. Most of the time 196 (56%) consent was taken one day before surgery but in few 2 (0.6%) instances it was taken on the morning of surgery and on operation table in some cases 3 (0.9%) as reported by patients. The consent form was signed by the patients themselves in only 204 (58.3%) cases and by their relatives in the rest. About half the number of patients 171 (48.9%) interviewed were satisfied from the information they received as informed consent process. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the poor quality of patient knowledge about surgical procedures and the inadequate information provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3494211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34942112012-11-28 Preoperative Informed Consent: Is It Truly Informed? Jawaid, M Farhan, M Masood, Z Husnain, SMN Iran J Public Health Original Article BACKGROUND: Pre-operative informed consent is an important aspect of surgery, yet there has been no formal training regarding it in Pakistan. This study was done to assess the preoperative informed consent practice. METHODS: After taking informed permission, a questionnaire was filled in during an interview with 350 patients, who have undergone elective surgical procedures under routine practice conditions from July to October 2010. All the patients were asked a set of standard questions which related to the information they were provided before the operation as a part of standard informed consent practice. RESULTS: Most i.e. 307 (87.7%) patients were informed about their condition but very few 12 (3.4%) were briefed regarding complications. Only 17 (4.9%) patients said they knew about the risks and complications of proposed anesthesia. One hundred thirty-eight (39.4%) patients said that they were allowed to ask questions while giving consent. Most of the time 196 (56%) consent was taken one day before surgery but in few 2 (0.6%) instances it was taken on the morning of surgery and on operation table in some cases 3 (0.9%) as reported by patients. The consent form was signed by the patients themselves in only 204 (58.3%) cases and by their relatives in the rest. About half the number of patients 171 (48.9%) interviewed were satisfied from the information they received as informed consent process. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the poor quality of patient knowledge about surgical procedures and the inadequate information provided. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2012-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3494211/ /pubmed/23193502 Text en Copyright © Iranian Public Health Association & Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License ((CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jawaid, M
Farhan, M
Masood, Z
Husnain, SMN
Preoperative Informed Consent: Is It Truly Informed?
title Preoperative Informed Consent: Is It Truly Informed?
title_full Preoperative Informed Consent: Is It Truly Informed?
title_fullStr Preoperative Informed Consent: Is It Truly Informed?
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative Informed Consent: Is It Truly Informed?
title_short Preoperative Informed Consent: Is It Truly Informed?
title_sort preoperative informed consent: is it truly informed?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3494211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23193502
work_keys_str_mv AT jawaidm preoperativeinformedconsentisittrulyinformed
AT farhanm preoperativeinformedconsentisittrulyinformed
AT masoodz preoperativeinformedconsentisittrulyinformed
AT husnainsmn preoperativeinformedconsentisittrulyinformed