Cargando…

Genomic Grade Index predicts postoperative clinical outcome of GIST

BACKGROUND: Prognosis of localised gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is heterogeneous, notably for patients with AFIP intermediate or high risk of relapse, who are candidates to adjuvant imatinib. We hypothesised that gene expression profiles might improve the prognostication and help to refine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertucci, F, Finetti, P, Ostrowski, J, Kim, W K, Kim, H, Pantaleo, M A, Astolfi, A, Polkowski, M, Birnbaum, D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3494448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22929880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.390
_version_ 1782249392471801856
author Bertucci, F
Finetti, P
Ostrowski, J
Kim, W K
Kim, H
Pantaleo, M A
Astolfi, A
Polkowski, M
Birnbaum, D
author_facet Bertucci, F
Finetti, P
Ostrowski, J
Kim, W K
Kim, H
Pantaleo, M A
Astolfi, A
Polkowski, M
Birnbaum, D
author_sort Bertucci, F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prognosis of localised gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is heterogeneous, notably for patients with AFIP intermediate or high risk of relapse, who are candidates to adjuvant imatinib. We hypothesised that gene expression profiles might improve the prognostication and help to refine the indications for imatinib. METHODS: We collected gene expression and histoclinical data of 146 pre-treatment localised GIST samples treated with surgery alone. We searched for a gene expression signature (GES) predictive for relapse-free survival (RFS) and compared its performances to that of three published prognostic proliferation-based GES (Genomic Grade Index (GGI), 16-Kinase, and CINSARC) and AFIP classification. We also analysed a data set from 28 patients with advanced GIST treated with neo-adjuvant imatinib. RESULTS: We identified a 275-gene GES (gene expression signature) predictive of RFS in a learning set and validated its robustness in an independent set. However, the GGI outperformed its prognostic performances, and those of the two other signatures and the AFIP intermediate-risk classification in two independent tests sets in uni- and multivariate analyses. Importantly, GGI could split the AFIP intermediate/high-risk samples into two groups with different RFS. Genomic Grade Index ‘high-risk’ tumours were more proliferative and genetically unstable than ‘low-risk’ tumours, and more sensitive to imatinib. CONCLUSION: GGI refines the prediction of RFS in localised GIST and might help tailor adjuvant imatinib.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3494448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34944482013-10-09 Genomic Grade Index predicts postoperative clinical outcome of GIST Bertucci, F Finetti, P Ostrowski, J Kim, W K Kim, H Pantaleo, M A Astolfi, A Polkowski, M Birnbaum, D Br J Cancer Genetics and Genomics BACKGROUND: Prognosis of localised gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is heterogeneous, notably for patients with AFIP intermediate or high risk of relapse, who are candidates to adjuvant imatinib. We hypothesised that gene expression profiles might improve the prognostication and help to refine the indications for imatinib. METHODS: We collected gene expression and histoclinical data of 146 pre-treatment localised GIST samples treated with surgery alone. We searched for a gene expression signature (GES) predictive for relapse-free survival (RFS) and compared its performances to that of three published prognostic proliferation-based GES (Genomic Grade Index (GGI), 16-Kinase, and CINSARC) and AFIP classification. We also analysed a data set from 28 patients with advanced GIST treated with neo-adjuvant imatinib. RESULTS: We identified a 275-gene GES (gene expression signature) predictive of RFS in a learning set and validated its robustness in an independent set. However, the GGI outperformed its prognostic performances, and those of the two other signatures and the AFIP intermediate-risk classification in two independent tests sets in uni- and multivariate analyses. Importantly, GGI could split the AFIP intermediate/high-risk samples into two groups with different RFS. Genomic Grade Index ‘high-risk’ tumours were more proliferative and genetically unstable than ‘low-risk’ tumours, and more sensitive to imatinib. CONCLUSION: GGI refines the prediction of RFS in localised GIST and might help tailor adjuvant imatinib. Nature Publishing Group 2012-10-09 2012-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3494448/ /pubmed/22929880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.390 Text en Copyright © 2012 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Genetics and Genomics
Bertucci, F
Finetti, P
Ostrowski, J
Kim, W K
Kim, H
Pantaleo, M A
Astolfi, A
Polkowski, M
Birnbaum, D
Genomic Grade Index predicts postoperative clinical outcome of GIST
title Genomic Grade Index predicts postoperative clinical outcome of GIST
title_full Genomic Grade Index predicts postoperative clinical outcome of GIST
title_fullStr Genomic Grade Index predicts postoperative clinical outcome of GIST
title_full_unstemmed Genomic Grade Index predicts postoperative clinical outcome of GIST
title_short Genomic Grade Index predicts postoperative clinical outcome of GIST
title_sort genomic grade index predicts postoperative clinical outcome of gist
topic Genetics and Genomics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3494448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22929880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.390
work_keys_str_mv AT bertuccif genomicgradeindexpredictspostoperativeclinicaloutcomeofgist
AT finettip genomicgradeindexpredictspostoperativeclinicaloutcomeofgist
AT ostrowskij genomicgradeindexpredictspostoperativeclinicaloutcomeofgist
AT kimwk genomicgradeindexpredictspostoperativeclinicaloutcomeofgist
AT kimh genomicgradeindexpredictspostoperativeclinicaloutcomeofgist
AT pantaleoma genomicgradeindexpredictspostoperativeclinicaloutcomeofgist
AT astolfia genomicgradeindexpredictspostoperativeclinicaloutcomeofgist
AT polkowskim genomicgradeindexpredictspostoperativeclinicaloutcomeofgist
AT birnbaumd genomicgradeindexpredictspostoperativeclinicaloutcomeofgist