Cargando…
Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial
BACKGROUND: Prior efforts to train medical journal peer reviewers have not improved subsequent review quality, although such interventions were general and brief. We hypothesized that a manuscript-specific and more extended intervention pairing new reviewers with high-quality senior reviewers as men...
Autores principales: | Houry, Debra, Green, Steven, Callaham, Michael |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3494517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22928960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-83 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Relationship of Previous Training and Experience of Journal Peer Reviewers to Subsequent Review Quality
por: Callaham, Michael L, et al.
Publicado: (2007) -
Effect of revealing authors’ conflicts of interests in peer review: randomized controlled trial
por: John, Leslie K, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Training and Experience of Peer Reviewers: Authors' Reply
por: Callaham, Michael
Publicado: (2007) -
Training of Peer Reviewers: Validation of a 5-Point Rating Scale
por: Callaham, Michael
Publicado: (2007) -
Improving the peer review skills of young rheumatologists and researchers in rheumatology: the EMEUNET Peer Review Mentoring Program
por: Rodríguez-Carrio, Javier, et al.
Publicado: (2018)