Cargando…

Impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on target volume delineation in recurrent or residual gynaecologic carcinoma

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on target volume delineation in gynaecological cancer. METHODS: F-FDG PET/CT based RT treatment planning was performed in 10 patients with locally recurrent (n = 5) or post-surgical residual gynaecological cancer (n = 5). The gross tumor volume...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vees, Hansjörg, Casanova, Nathalie, Zilli, Thomas, Imperiano, Hestia, Ratib, Osman, Popowski, Youri, Wang, Hui, Zaidi, Habib, Miralbell, Raymond
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3494570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23088346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-176
_version_ 1782249410014478336
author Vees, Hansjörg
Casanova, Nathalie
Zilli, Thomas
Imperiano, Hestia
Ratib, Osman
Popowski, Youri
Wang, Hui
Zaidi, Habib
Miralbell, Raymond
author_facet Vees, Hansjörg
Casanova, Nathalie
Zilli, Thomas
Imperiano, Hestia
Ratib, Osman
Popowski, Youri
Wang, Hui
Zaidi, Habib
Miralbell, Raymond
author_sort Vees, Hansjörg
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on target volume delineation in gynaecological cancer. METHODS: F-FDG PET/CT based RT treatment planning was performed in 10 patients with locally recurrent (n = 5) or post-surgical residual gynaecological cancer (n = 5). The gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined by 4 experienced radiation oncologists first using contrast enhanced CT (GTV(CT)) and secondly using the fused (18)F-FDG PET/CT datasets (GTV(PET/CT)). In addition, the GTV was delineated using the signal-to-background (SBR) ratio-based adaptive thresholding technique (GTV(SBR)). Overlap analysis were conducted to assess geographic mismatches between the GTVs delineated using the different techniques. Inter- and intra-observer variability were also assessed. RESULTS: The mean GTV(CT) (43.65 cm(3)) was larger than the mean GTV(PET/CT) (33.06 cm(3)), p = 0.02. In 6 patients, GTV(PET/CT) added substantial tumor extension outside the GTV(CT) even though 90.4% of the GTV(PET/CT) was included in the GTV(CT) and 30.2% of the GTV(CT) was found outside the GTV(PET/CT). The inter- and intra-observer variability was not significantly reduced with the inclusion of (18)F-FDG PET imaging (p = 0.23 and p = 0.18, respectively). The GTV(SBR) was smaller than GTV(CT) p ≤ 0.005 and GTV(PET/CT) p ≤ 0.005. CONCLUSIONS: The use of (18)F-FDG PET/CT images for target volume delineation of recurrent or post-surgical residual gynaecological cancer alters the GTV in the majority of patients compared to standard CT-definition. The use of SBR-based auto-delineation showed significantly smaller GTVs. The use of PET/CT based target volume delineation may improve the accuracy of RT treatment planning in gynaecologic cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3494570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34945702012-11-10 Impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on target volume delineation in recurrent or residual gynaecologic carcinoma Vees, Hansjörg Casanova, Nathalie Zilli, Thomas Imperiano, Hestia Ratib, Osman Popowski, Youri Wang, Hui Zaidi, Habib Miralbell, Raymond Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on target volume delineation in gynaecological cancer. METHODS: F-FDG PET/CT based RT treatment planning was performed in 10 patients with locally recurrent (n = 5) or post-surgical residual gynaecological cancer (n = 5). The gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined by 4 experienced radiation oncologists first using contrast enhanced CT (GTV(CT)) and secondly using the fused (18)F-FDG PET/CT datasets (GTV(PET/CT)). In addition, the GTV was delineated using the signal-to-background (SBR) ratio-based adaptive thresholding technique (GTV(SBR)). Overlap analysis were conducted to assess geographic mismatches between the GTVs delineated using the different techniques. Inter- and intra-observer variability were also assessed. RESULTS: The mean GTV(CT) (43.65 cm(3)) was larger than the mean GTV(PET/CT) (33.06 cm(3)), p = 0.02. In 6 patients, GTV(PET/CT) added substantial tumor extension outside the GTV(CT) even though 90.4% of the GTV(PET/CT) was included in the GTV(CT) and 30.2% of the GTV(CT) was found outside the GTV(PET/CT). The inter- and intra-observer variability was not significantly reduced with the inclusion of (18)F-FDG PET imaging (p = 0.23 and p = 0.18, respectively). The GTV(SBR) was smaller than GTV(CT) p ≤ 0.005 and GTV(PET/CT) p ≤ 0.005. CONCLUSIONS: The use of (18)F-FDG PET/CT images for target volume delineation of recurrent or post-surgical residual gynaecological cancer alters the GTV in the majority of patients compared to standard CT-definition. The use of SBR-based auto-delineation showed significantly smaller GTVs. The use of PET/CT based target volume delineation may improve the accuracy of RT treatment planning in gynaecologic cancer. BioMed Central 2012-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3494570/ /pubmed/23088346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-176 Text en Copyright ©2012 Vees et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Vees, Hansjörg
Casanova, Nathalie
Zilli, Thomas
Imperiano, Hestia
Ratib, Osman
Popowski, Youri
Wang, Hui
Zaidi, Habib
Miralbell, Raymond
Impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on target volume delineation in recurrent or residual gynaecologic carcinoma
title Impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on target volume delineation in recurrent or residual gynaecologic carcinoma
title_full Impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on target volume delineation in recurrent or residual gynaecologic carcinoma
title_fullStr Impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on target volume delineation in recurrent or residual gynaecologic carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on target volume delineation in recurrent or residual gynaecologic carcinoma
title_short Impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on target volume delineation in recurrent or residual gynaecologic carcinoma
title_sort impact of (18)f-fdg pet/ct on target volume delineation in recurrent or residual gynaecologic carcinoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3494570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23088346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-176
work_keys_str_mv AT veeshansjorg impactof18ffdgpetctontargetvolumedelineationinrecurrentorresidualgynaecologiccarcinoma
AT casanovanathalie impactof18ffdgpetctontargetvolumedelineationinrecurrentorresidualgynaecologiccarcinoma
AT zillithomas impactof18ffdgpetctontargetvolumedelineationinrecurrentorresidualgynaecologiccarcinoma
AT imperianohestia impactof18ffdgpetctontargetvolumedelineationinrecurrentorresidualgynaecologiccarcinoma
AT ratibosman impactof18ffdgpetctontargetvolumedelineationinrecurrentorresidualgynaecologiccarcinoma
AT popowskiyouri impactof18ffdgpetctontargetvolumedelineationinrecurrentorresidualgynaecologiccarcinoma
AT wanghui impactof18ffdgpetctontargetvolumedelineationinrecurrentorresidualgynaecologiccarcinoma
AT zaidihabib impactof18ffdgpetctontargetvolumedelineationinrecurrentorresidualgynaecologiccarcinoma
AT miralbellraymond impactof18ffdgpetctontargetvolumedelineationinrecurrentorresidualgynaecologiccarcinoma