Cargando…

Evaluating patient values and preferences for thromboprophylaxis decision making during pregnancy: a study protocol

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with prior venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at risk of recurrence. Low molecular weight heparin (LWMH) reduces the risk of pregnancy-related VTE. LMWH prophylaxis is, however, inconvenient, uncomfortable, costly, medicalizes pregnancy, and may be associated with increased...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alonso-Coello, Pablo, Ebrahim, Shanil, Guyatt, Gordon H, Tikkinen, Kari AO, Eckman, Mark H, Neumann, Ignacio, McDonald, Sarah D, Akl, Elie A, Bates, Shannon M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3495041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22646475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-40
_version_ 1782249458979831808
author Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Ebrahim, Shanil
Guyatt, Gordon H
Tikkinen, Kari AO
Eckman, Mark H
Neumann, Ignacio
McDonald, Sarah D
Akl, Elie A
Bates, Shannon M
author_facet Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Ebrahim, Shanil
Guyatt, Gordon H
Tikkinen, Kari AO
Eckman, Mark H
Neumann, Ignacio
McDonald, Sarah D
Akl, Elie A
Bates, Shannon M
author_sort Alonso-Coello, Pablo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with prior venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at risk of recurrence. Low molecular weight heparin (LWMH) reduces the risk of pregnancy-related VTE. LMWH prophylaxis is, however, inconvenient, uncomfortable, costly, medicalizes pregnancy, and may be associated with increased risks of obstetrical bleeding. Further, there is uncertainty in the estimates of both the baseline risk of pregnancy-related recurrent VTE and the effects of antepartum LMWH prophylaxis. The values and treatment preferences of pregnant women, crucial when making recommendations for prophylaxis, are currently unknown. The objective of this study is to address this gap in knowledge. METHODS: We will perform a multi-center cross-sectional interview study in Canada, USA, Norway and Finland. The study population will consist of 100 women with a history of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), and who are either pregnant, planning pregnancy, or may in the future consider pregnancy (women between 18 and 45 years). We will exclude individuals who are on full dose anticoagulation or thromboprophylaxis, who have undergone surgical sterilization, or whose partners have undergone vasectomy. We will determine each participant's willingness to receive LMWH prophylaxis during pregnancy through direct choice exercises based on real life and hypothetical scenarios, preference-elicitation using a visual analog scale (“feeling thermometer”), and a probability trade-off exercise. The primary outcome will be the minimum reduction (threshold) in VTE risk at which women change from declining to accepting LMWH prophylaxis. We will explore possible determinants of this choice, including educational attainment, the characteristics of the women’s prior VTE, and prior experience with LMWH. We will determine the utilities that women place on the burden of LMWH prophylaxis, pregnancy-related DVT, pregnancy-related PE and pregnancy-related hemorrhage. We will generate a “personalized decision analysis” using participants’ utilities and their personalized risk of recurrent VTE as inputs to a decision analytic model. We will compare the personalized decision analysis to the participant’s stated choice. DISCUSSION: The preferences of pregnant women at risk of VTE with respect to the use of antithrombotic therapy remain unexplored. This research will provide explicit, quantitative expressions of women's valuations of health states related to recurrent VTE and its prevention with LMWH. This information will be crucial for both guideline developers and for clinicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3495041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34950412012-11-11 Evaluating patient values and preferences for thromboprophylaxis decision making during pregnancy: a study protocol Alonso-Coello, Pablo Ebrahim, Shanil Guyatt, Gordon H Tikkinen, Kari AO Eckman, Mark H Neumann, Ignacio McDonald, Sarah D Akl, Elie A Bates, Shannon M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with prior venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at risk of recurrence. Low molecular weight heparin (LWMH) reduces the risk of pregnancy-related VTE. LMWH prophylaxis is, however, inconvenient, uncomfortable, costly, medicalizes pregnancy, and may be associated with increased risks of obstetrical bleeding. Further, there is uncertainty in the estimates of both the baseline risk of pregnancy-related recurrent VTE and the effects of antepartum LMWH prophylaxis. The values and treatment preferences of pregnant women, crucial when making recommendations for prophylaxis, are currently unknown. The objective of this study is to address this gap in knowledge. METHODS: We will perform a multi-center cross-sectional interview study in Canada, USA, Norway and Finland. The study population will consist of 100 women with a history of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), and who are either pregnant, planning pregnancy, or may in the future consider pregnancy (women between 18 and 45 years). We will exclude individuals who are on full dose anticoagulation or thromboprophylaxis, who have undergone surgical sterilization, or whose partners have undergone vasectomy. We will determine each participant's willingness to receive LMWH prophylaxis during pregnancy through direct choice exercises based on real life and hypothetical scenarios, preference-elicitation using a visual analog scale (“feeling thermometer”), and a probability trade-off exercise. The primary outcome will be the minimum reduction (threshold) in VTE risk at which women change from declining to accepting LMWH prophylaxis. We will explore possible determinants of this choice, including educational attainment, the characteristics of the women’s prior VTE, and prior experience with LMWH. We will determine the utilities that women place on the burden of LMWH prophylaxis, pregnancy-related DVT, pregnancy-related PE and pregnancy-related hemorrhage. We will generate a “personalized decision analysis” using participants’ utilities and their personalized risk of recurrent VTE as inputs to a decision analytic model. We will compare the personalized decision analysis to the participant’s stated choice. DISCUSSION: The preferences of pregnant women at risk of VTE with respect to the use of antithrombotic therapy remain unexplored. This research will provide explicit, quantitative expressions of women's valuations of health states related to recurrent VTE and its prevention with LMWH. This information will be crucial for both guideline developers and for clinicians. BioMed Central 2012-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3495041/ /pubmed/22646475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-40 Text en Copyright ©2012 Alonso-Coello et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Ebrahim, Shanil
Guyatt, Gordon H
Tikkinen, Kari AO
Eckman, Mark H
Neumann, Ignacio
McDonald, Sarah D
Akl, Elie A
Bates, Shannon M
Evaluating patient values and preferences for thromboprophylaxis decision making during pregnancy: a study protocol
title Evaluating patient values and preferences for thromboprophylaxis decision making during pregnancy: a study protocol
title_full Evaluating patient values and preferences for thromboprophylaxis decision making during pregnancy: a study protocol
title_fullStr Evaluating patient values and preferences for thromboprophylaxis decision making during pregnancy: a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating patient values and preferences for thromboprophylaxis decision making during pregnancy: a study protocol
title_short Evaluating patient values and preferences for thromboprophylaxis decision making during pregnancy: a study protocol
title_sort evaluating patient values and preferences for thromboprophylaxis decision making during pregnancy: a study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3495041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22646475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-40
work_keys_str_mv AT alonsocoellopablo evaluatingpatientvaluesandpreferencesforthromboprophylaxisdecisionmakingduringpregnancyastudyprotocol
AT ebrahimshanil evaluatingpatientvaluesandpreferencesforthromboprophylaxisdecisionmakingduringpregnancyastudyprotocol
AT guyattgordonh evaluatingpatientvaluesandpreferencesforthromboprophylaxisdecisionmakingduringpregnancyastudyprotocol
AT tikkinenkariao evaluatingpatientvaluesandpreferencesforthromboprophylaxisdecisionmakingduringpregnancyastudyprotocol
AT eckmanmarkh evaluatingpatientvaluesandpreferencesforthromboprophylaxisdecisionmakingduringpregnancyastudyprotocol
AT neumannignacio evaluatingpatientvaluesandpreferencesforthromboprophylaxisdecisionmakingduringpregnancyastudyprotocol
AT mcdonaldsarahd evaluatingpatientvaluesandpreferencesforthromboprophylaxisdecisionmakingduringpregnancyastudyprotocol
AT akleliea evaluatingpatientvaluesandpreferencesforthromboprophylaxisdecisionmakingduringpregnancyastudyprotocol
AT batesshannonm evaluatingpatientvaluesandpreferencesforthromboprophylaxisdecisionmakingduringpregnancyastudyprotocol