Cargando…
Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for acupuncture research - a consensus document for conducting trials
BACKGROUND: There is a need for more Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) to strengthen the evidence base for clinical and policy decision-making. Effectiveness Guidance Documents (EGD) are targeted to clinical researchers. The aim of this EGD is to provide specific recommendations for the desig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3495216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22953730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-148 |
_version_ | 1782249469987782656 |
---|---|
author | Witt, Claudia M Aickin, Mikel Baca, Trini Cherkin, Dan Haan, Mary N Hammerschlag, Richard Hao, Jason Jishun Kaplan, George A Lao, Lixing McKay, Terri Pierce, Beverly Riley, David Ritenbaugh, Cheryl Thorpe, Kevin Tunis, Sean Weissberg, Jed Berman, Brian M |
author_facet | Witt, Claudia M Aickin, Mikel Baca, Trini Cherkin, Dan Haan, Mary N Hammerschlag, Richard Hao, Jason Jishun Kaplan, George A Lao, Lixing McKay, Terri Pierce, Beverly Riley, David Ritenbaugh, Cheryl Thorpe, Kevin Tunis, Sean Weissberg, Jed Berman, Brian M |
author_sort | Witt, Claudia M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a need for more Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) to strengthen the evidence base for clinical and policy decision-making. Effectiveness Guidance Documents (EGD) are targeted to clinical researchers. The aim of this EGD is to provide specific recommendations for the design of prospective acupuncture studies to support optimal use of resources for generating evidence that will inform stakeholder decision-making. METHODS: Document development based on multiple systematic consensus procedures (written Delphi rounds, interactive consensus workshop, international expert review). To balance aspects of internal and external validity, multiple stakeholders including patients, clinicians and payers were involved. RESULTS: Recommendations focused mainly on randomized studies and were developed for the following areas: overall research strategy, treatment protocol, expertise and setting, outcomes, study design and statistical analyses, economic evaluation, and publication. CONCLUSION: The present EGD, based on an international consensus developed with multiple stakeholder involvement, provides the first systematic methodological guidance for future CER on acupuncture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3495216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34952162012-11-12 Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for acupuncture research - a consensus document for conducting trials Witt, Claudia M Aickin, Mikel Baca, Trini Cherkin, Dan Haan, Mary N Hammerschlag, Richard Hao, Jason Jishun Kaplan, George A Lao, Lixing McKay, Terri Pierce, Beverly Riley, David Ritenbaugh, Cheryl Thorpe, Kevin Tunis, Sean Weissberg, Jed Berman, Brian M BMC Complement Altern Med Correspondence BACKGROUND: There is a need for more Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) to strengthen the evidence base for clinical and policy decision-making. Effectiveness Guidance Documents (EGD) are targeted to clinical researchers. The aim of this EGD is to provide specific recommendations for the design of prospective acupuncture studies to support optimal use of resources for generating evidence that will inform stakeholder decision-making. METHODS: Document development based on multiple systematic consensus procedures (written Delphi rounds, interactive consensus workshop, international expert review). To balance aspects of internal and external validity, multiple stakeholders including patients, clinicians and payers were involved. RESULTS: Recommendations focused mainly on randomized studies and were developed for the following areas: overall research strategy, treatment protocol, expertise and setting, outcomes, study design and statistical analyses, economic evaluation, and publication. CONCLUSION: The present EGD, based on an international consensus developed with multiple stakeholder involvement, provides the first systematic methodological guidance for future CER on acupuncture. BioMed Central 2012-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3495216/ /pubmed/22953730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-148 Text en Copyright ©2012 Witt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Correspondence Witt, Claudia M Aickin, Mikel Baca, Trini Cherkin, Dan Haan, Mary N Hammerschlag, Richard Hao, Jason Jishun Kaplan, George A Lao, Lixing McKay, Terri Pierce, Beverly Riley, David Ritenbaugh, Cheryl Thorpe, Kevin Tunis, Sean Weissberg, Jed Berman, Brian M Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for acupuncture research - a consensus document for conducting trials |
title | Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for acupuncture research - a consensus document for conducting trials |
title_full | Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for acupuncture research - a consensus document for conducting trials |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for acupuncture research - a consensus document for conducting trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for acupuncture research - a consensus document for conducting trials |
title_short | Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for acupuncture research - a consensus document for conducting trials |
title_sort | effectiveness guidance document (egd) for acupuncture research - a consensus document for conducting trials |
topic | Correspondence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3495216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22953730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-148 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wittclaudiam effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials AT aickinmikel effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials AT bacatrini effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials AT cherkindan effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials AT haanmaryn effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials AT hammerschlagrichard effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials AT haojasonjishun effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials AT kaplangeorgea effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials AT laolixing effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials AT mckayterri effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials AT piercebeverly effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials AT rileydavid effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials AT ritenbaughcheryl effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials AT thorpekevin effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials AT tunissean effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials AT weissbergjed effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials AT bermanbrianm effectivenessguidancedocumentegdforacupunctureresearchaconsensusdocumentforconductingtrials |