Cargando…
Comparing the effectiveness of copper intrauterine devices available in Canada. Is FlexiT non-inferior to NovaT when inserted immediately after first-trimester abortion? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: We describe the rationale and protocol for a randomized noninferiority controlled trial (RCT) to determine if the Flexi-T380(+) copper intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is comparable in terms of effectiveness and expulsion rates to the most common Canadian IUD currently in use, Nov...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3495410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22920273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-147 |
_version_ | 1782249502939283456 |
---|---|
author | Norman, Wendy V Chiles, Jessica L Turner, Caroline A Brant, Rollin Aslan, Andra Kaczorowski, Janusz |
author_facet | Norman, Wendy V Chiles, Jessica L Turner, Caroline A Brant, Rollin Aslan, Andra Kaczorowski, Janusz |
author_sort | Norman, Wendy V |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We describe the rationale and protocol for a randomized noninferiority controlled trial (RCT) to determine if the Flexi-T380(+) copper intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is comparable in terms of effectiveness and expulsion rates to the most common Canadian IUD currently in use, NovaT-200, when placed immediately after a first-trimester abortion. METHODS/DESIGN: Consenting women choosing to use an IUD after an abortion for a pregnancy of less than 12 weeks of gestation will be randomized to device-type groups to receive immediate post-abortion placement of either a Flexi-T380(+) IUD, a device for which no current evidence on expulsion or effectiveness rates is available, or the Nova-T200 IUD, the only other brand of copper IUD available in Canada at the time of study initiation. The primary outcome measure is IUD expulsion rate at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include: pregnancy rate, method continuation rate, complication rates (infection, perforation), and satisfaction with contraceptive method. A non-intervention group of consenting women choosing a range of other post-abortion contraception methods, including no contraception, will be included for comparison of secondary outcomes. Web-based contraception satisfaction questionnaires, clinical records, and government-linked health administrative databases will be used to assess primary and secondary outcomes. DISCUSSION: The RCT design, combined with access to clinical records at all provincial abortion clinics, and to information in provincial single-payer linked administrative health databases, birth registry, and hospital records, offers a unique opportunity to determine if a novel IUD has a comparable expulsion rate to that of the current standard IUD in Canada, in addition to the first opportunity to determine pregnancy rate and method satisfaction at 1 year post-abortion for women choosing a range of post-abortion contraceptive options. We highlight considerations of design, implementation, and evaluation of the first trial to provide rigorous evidence for the effectiveness of current Canadian IUDs when inserted after first-trimester abortion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01174225 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3495410 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34954102012-11-13 Comparing the effectiveness of copper intrauterine devices available in Canada. Is FlexiT non-inferior to NovaT when inserted immediately after first-trimester abortion? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Norman, Wendy V Chiles, Jessica L Turner, Caroline A Brant, Rollin Aslan, Andra Kaczorowski, Janusz Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: We describe the rationale and protocol for a randomized noninferiority controlled trial (RCT) to determine if the Flexi-T380(+) copper intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is comparable in terms of effectiveness and expulsion rates to the most common Canadian IUD currently in use, NovaT-200, when placed immediately after a first-trimester abortion. METHODS/DESIGN: Consenting women choosing to use an IUD after an abortion for a pregnancy of less than 12 weeks of gestation will be randomized to device-type groups to receive immediate post-abortion placement of either a Flexi-T380(+) IUD, a device for which no current evidence on expulsion or effectiveness rates is available, or the Nova-T200 IUD, the only other brand of copper IUD available in Canada at the time of study initiation. The primary outcome measure is IUD expulsion rate at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include: pregnancy rate, method continuation rate, complication rates (infection, perforation), and satisfaction with contraceptive method. A non-intervention group of consenting women choosing a range of other post-abortion contraception methods, including no contraception, will be included for comparison of secondary outcomes. Web-based contraception satisfaction questionnaires, clinical records, and government-linked health administrative databases will be used to assess primary and secondary outcomes. DISCUSSION: The RCT design, combined with access to clinical records at all provincial abortion clinics, and to information in provincial single-payer linked administrative health databases, birth registry, and hospital records, offers a unique opportunity to determine if a novel IUD has a comparable expulsion rate to that of the current standard IUD in Canada, in addition to the first opportunity to determine pregnancy rate and method satisfaction at 1 year post-abortion for women choosing a range of post-abortion contraceptive options. We highlight considerations of design, implementation, and evaluation of the first trial to provide rigorous evidence for the effectiveness of current Canadian IUDs when inserted after first-trimester abortion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01174225 BioMed Central 2012-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3495410/ /pubmed/22920273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-147 Text en Copyright ©2012 Norman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Norman, Wendy V Chiles, Jessica L Turner, Caroline A Brant, Rollin Aslan, Andra Kaczorowski, Janusz Comparing the effectiveness of copper intrauterine devices available in Canada. Is FlexiT non-inferior to NovaT when inserted immediately after first-trimester abortion? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparing the effectiveness of copper intrauterine devices available in Canada. Is FlexiT non-inferior to NovaT when inserted immediately after first-trimester abortion? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparing the effectiveness of copper intrauterine devices available in Canada. Is FlexiT non-inferior to NovaT when inserted immediately after first-trimester abortion? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparing the effectiveness of copper intrauterine devices available in Canada. Is FlexiT non-inferior to NovaT when inserted immediately after first-trimester abortion? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the effectiveness of copper intrauterine devices available in Canada. Is FlexiT non-inferior to NovaT when inserted immediately after first-trimester abortion? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparing the effectiveness of copper intrauterine devices available in Canada. Is FlexiT non-inferior to NovaT when inserted immediately after first-trimester abortion? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparing the effectiveness of copper intrauterine devices available in canada. is flexit non-inferior to novat when inserted immediately after first-trimester abortion? study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3495410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22920273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT normanwendyv comparingtheeffectivenessofcopperintrauterinedevicesavailableincanadaisflexitnoninferiortonovatwheninsertedimmediatelyafterfirsttrimesterabortionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chilesjessical comparingtheeffectivenessofcopperintrauterinedevicesavailableincanadaisflexitnoninferiortonovatwheninsertedimmediatelyafterfirsttrimesterabortionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT turnercarolinea comparingtheeffectivenessofcopperintrauterinedevicesavailableincanadaisflexitnoninferiortonovatwheninsertedimmediatelyafterfirsttrimesterabortionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brantrollin comparingtheeffectivenessofcopperintrauterinedevicesavailableincanadaisflexitnoninferiortonovatwheninsertedimmediatelyafterfirsttrimesterabortionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT aslanandra comparingtheeffectivenessofcopperintrauterinedevicesavailableincanadaisflexitnoninferiortonovatwheninsertedimmediatelyafterfirsttrimesterabortionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kaczorowskijanusz comparingtheeffectivenessofcopperintrauterinedevicesavailableincanadaisflexitnoninferiortonovatwheninsertedimmediatelyafterfirsttrimesterabortionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |