Cargando…

The application of evidence-based measures to reduce surgical site infections during orthopedic surgery - report of a single-center experience in Sweden

BACKGROUND: Current knowledge suggests that, by applying evidence-based measures relating to the correct use of prophylactic antibiotics, perioperative normothermia, urinary tract catheterization and hand hygiene, important contributions can be made to reducing the risk of postoperative infections a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersson, Annette Erichsen, Bergh, Ingrid, Karlsson, Jón, Eriksson, Bengt I, Nilsson, Kerstin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3495663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22697808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-6-11
_version_ 1782249544528953344
author Andersson, Annette Erichsen
Bergh, Ingrid
Karlsson, Jón
Eriksson, Bengt I
Nilsson, Kerstin
author_facet Andersson, Annette Erichsen
Bergh, Ingrid
Karlsson, Jón
Eriksson, Bengt I
Nilsson, Kerstin
author_sort Andersson, Annette Erichsen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current knowledge suggests that, by applying evidence-based measures relating to the correct use of prophylactic antibiotics, perioperative normothermia, urinary tract catheterization and hand hygiene, important contributions can be made to reducing the risk of postoperative infections and device-related infections. The aim of this study was to explore and describe the application of intraoperative evidence-based measures, designed to reduce the risk of infection. In addition, we aimed to investigate whether the type of surgery, i.e. total joint arthroplasty compared with tibia and femur/hip fracture surgery, affected the use of protective measures. METHOD: Data on the clinical application of evidence-based measures were collected structurally on site during 69 consecutively included operations involving fracture surgery (n = 35) and total joint arthroplasties (n = 34) using a pre-tested observation form. For observations in relation to hand disinfection, a modified version of the World Health Organization hand hygiene observation method was used. RESULTS: In all, only 29 patients (49%) of 59 received prophylaxis within the recommended time span. The differences in the timing of prophylactic antibiotics between total joint arthroplasty and fracture surgery were significant, i.e. a more accurate timing was implemented in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (p = 0.02). Eighteen (53%) of the patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty were actively treated with a forced-air warming system. The corresponding number for fracture surgery was 12 (34%) (p = 0.04). Observations of 254 opportunities for hand hygiene revealed an overall adherence rate of 10.3% to hand disinfection guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that the utilization of evidence-based measures to reduce infections in clinical practice is not sufficient and there are unjustifiable differences in care depending on the type of surgery. The poor adherence to hand hygiene precautions in the operating room is a serious problem for patient safety and further studies should focus on resolving this problem. The WHO Safe Surgery checklist “time out” worked as an important reminder, but is not per se a guarantee of safety; it is the way we act in response to mistakes or lapses that finally matters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3495663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34956632012-11-13 The application of evidence-based measures to reduce surgical site infections during orthopedic surgery - report of a single-center experience in Sweden Andersson, Annette Erichsen Bergh, Ingrid Karlsson, Jón Eriksson, Bengt I Nilsson, Kerstin Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: Current knowledge suggests that, by applying evidence-based measures relating to the correct use of prophylactic antibiotics, perioperative normothermia, urinary tract catheterization and hand hygiene, important contributions can be made to reducing the risk of postoperative infections and device-related infections. The aim of this study was to explore and describe the application of intraoperative evidence-based measures, designed to reduce the risk of infection. In addition, we aimed to investigate whether the type of surgery, i.e. total joint arthroplasty compared with tibia and femur/hip fracture surgery, affected the use of protective measures. METHOD: Data on the clinical application of evidence-based measures were collected structurally on site during 69 consecutively included operations involving fracture surgery (n = 35) and total joint arthroplasties (n = 34) using a pre-tested observation form. For observations in relation to hand disinfection, a modified version of the World Health Organization hand hygiene observation method was used. RESULTS: In all, only 29 patients (49%) of 59 received prophylaxis within the recommended time span. The differences in the timing of prophylactic antibiotics between total joint arthroplasty and fracture surgery were significant, i.e. a more accurate timing was implemented in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (p = 0.02). Eighteen (53%) of the patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty were actively treated with a forced-air warming system. The corresponding number for fracture surgery was 12 (34%) (p = 0.04). Observations of 254 opportunities for hand hygiene revealed an overall adherence rate of 10.3% to hand disinfection guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that the utilization of evidence-based measures to reduce infections in clinical practice is not sufficient and there are unjustifiable differences in care depending on the type of surgery. The poor adherence to hand hygiene precautions in the operating room is a serious problem for patient safety and further studies should focus on resolving this problem. The WHO Safe Surgery checklist “time out” worked as an important reminder, but is not per se a guarantee of safety; it is the way we act in response to mistakes or lapses that finally matters. BioMed Central 2012-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3495663/ /pubmed/22697808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-6-11 Text en Copyright ©2012 Andersson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Andersson, Annette Erichsen
Bergh, Ingrid
Karlsson, Jón
Eriksson, Bengt I
Nilsson, Kerstin
The application of evidence-based measures to reduce surgical site infections during orthopedic surgery - report of a single-center experience in Sweden
title The application of evidence-based measures to reduce surgical site infections during orthopedic surgery - report of a single-center experience in Sweden
title_full The application of evidence-based measures to reduce surgical site infections during orthopedic surgery - report of a single-center experience in Sweden
title_fullStr The application of evidence-based measures to reduce surgical site infections during orthopedic surgery - report of a single-center experience in Sweden
title_full_unstemmed The application of evidence-based measures to reduce surgical site infections during orthopedic surgery - report of a single-center experience in Sweden
title_short The application of evidence-based measures to reduce surgical site infections during orthopedic surgery - report of a single-center experience in Sweden
title_sort application of evidence-based measures to reduce surgical site infections during orthopedic surgery - report of a single-center experience in sweden
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3495663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22697808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-6-11
work_keys_str_mv AT anderssonannetteerichsen theapplicationofevidencebasedmeasurestoreducesurgicalsiteinfectionsduringorthopedicsurgeryreportofasinglecenterexperienceinsweden
AT berghingrid theapplicationofevidencebasedmeasurestoreducesurgicalsiteinfectionsduringorthopedicsurgeryreportofasinglecenterexperienceinsweden
AT karlssonjon theapplicationofevidencebasedmeasurestoreducesurgicalsiteinfectionsduringorthopedicsurgeryreportofasinglecenterexperienceinsweden
AT erikssonbengti theapplicationofevidencebasedmeasurestoreducesurgicalsiteinfectionsduringorthopedicsurgeryreportofasinglecenterexperienceinsweden
AT nilssonkerstin theapplicationofevidencebasedmeasurestoreducesurgicalsiteinfectionsduringorthopedicsurgeryreportofasinglecenterexperienceinsweden
AT anderssonannetteerichsen applicationofevidencebasedmeasurestoreducesurgicalsiteinfectionsduringorthopedicsurgeryreportofasinglecenterexperienceinsweden
AT berghingrid applicationofevidencebasedmeasurestoreducesurgicalsiteinfectionsduringorthopedicsurgeryreportofasinglecenterexperienceinsweden
AT karlssonjon applicationofevidencebasedmeasurestoreducesurgicalsiteinfectionsduringorthopedicsurgeryreportofasinglecenterexperienceinsweden
AT erikssonbengti applicationofevidencebasedmeasurestoreducesurgicalsiteinfectionsduringorthopedicsurgeryreportofasinglecenterexperienceinsweden
AT nilssonkerstin applicationofevidencebasedmeasurestoreducesurgicalsiteinfectionsduringorthopedicsurgeryreportofasinglecenterexperienceinsweden