Cargando…
Feeling labeled, judged, lectured, and rejected by family and friends over depression: Cautionary results for primary care clinicians from a multi-centered, qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Family and friends may help patients seek out and engage in depression care. However, patients’ social networks can also undermine depression treatment and recovery. In an effort to improve depression care in primary care settings, we sought to identify, categorize, and alert primary car...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3495682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22747989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-64 |
_version_ | 1782249549007421440 |
---|---|
author | Fernandez y Garcia, Erik Duberstein, Paul Paterniti, Debora A Cipri, Camille S Kravitz, Richard L Epstein, Ronald M |
author_facet | Fernandez y Garcia, Erik Duberstein, Paul Paterniti, Debora A Cipri, Camille S Kravitz, Richard L Epstein, Ronald M |
author_sort | Fernandez y Garcia, Erik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Family and friends may help patients seek out and engage in depression care. However, patients’ social networks can also undermine depression treatment and recovery. In an effort to improve depression care in primary care settings, we sought to identify, categorize, and alert primary care clinicians to depression-related messages that patients hear from friends and family that patients perceive as unhelpful or detrimental. METHODS: We conducted 15 focus groups in 3 cities. Participants (n = 116) with a personal history or knowledge of depression responded to open-ended questions about depression, including self-perceived barriers to care-seeking. Focus group conversations were audio-recorded and analyzed using iterative qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Four themes emerged related to negatively-received depression messages delivered by family and friends. Specifically, participants perceived these messages as making them feel labeled, judged, lectured to, and rejected by family and friends when discussing depression. Some participants also expressed their interpretation of their families’ motivations for delivering the messages and described how hearing these messages affected depression care. CONCLUSIONS: The richness of our results reflects the complexity of communication within depression sufferers’ social networks around this stigmatized issue. To leverage patients’ social support networks effectively in depression care, primary care clinicians should be aware of both the potentially beneficial and detrimental aspects of social support. Specifically, clinicians should consider using open-ended queries into patients’ experiences with discussing depression with family and friends as an initial step in the process. An open-ended approach may avoid future emotional trauma or stigmatization and assist patients in overcoming self-imposed barriers to depression discussion, symptom disclosure, treatment adherence and follow-up care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3495682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34956822012-11-13 Feeling labeled, judged, lectured, and rejected by family and friends over depression: Cautionary results for primary care clinicians from a multi-centered, qualitative study Fernandez y Garcia, Erik Duberstein, Paul Paterniti, Debora A Cipri, Camille S Kravitz, Richard L Epstein, Ronald M BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Family and friends may help patients seek out and engage in depression care. However, patients’ social networks can also undermine depression treatment and recovery. In an effort to improve depression care in primary care settings, we sought to identify, categorize, and alert primary care clinicians to depression-related messages that patients hear from friends and family that patients perceive as unhelpful or detrimental. METHODS: We conducted 15 focus groups in 3 cities. Participants (n = 116) with a personal history or knowledge of depression responded to open-ended questions about depression, including self-perceived barriers to care-seeking. Focus group conversations were audio-recorded and analyzed using iterative qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Four themes emerged related to negatively-received depression messages delivered by family and friends. Specifically, participants perceived these messages as making them feel labeled, judged, lectured to, and rejected by family and friends when discussing depression. Some participants also expressed their interpretation of their families’ motivations for delivering the messages and described how hearing these messages affected depression care. CONCLUSIONS: The richness of our results reflects the complexity of communication within depression sufferers’ social networks around this stigmatized issue. To leverage patients’ social support networks effectively in depression care, primary care clinicians should be aware of both the potentially beneficial and detrimental aspects of social support. Specifically, clinicians should consider using open-ended queries into patients’ experiences with discussing depression with family and friends as an initial step in the process. An open-ended approach may avoid future emotional trauma or stigmatization and assist patients in overcoming self-imposed barriers to depression discussion, symptom disclosure, treatment adherence and follow-up care. BioMed Central 2012-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3495682/ /pubmed/22747989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-64 Text en Copyright ©2012 Fernandez y Garcia et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fernandez y Garcia, Erik Duberstein, Paul Paterniti, Debora A Cipri, Camille S Kravitz, Richard L Epstein, Ronald M Feeling labeled, judged, lectured, and rejected by family and friends over depression: Cautionary results for primary care clinicians from a multi-centered, qualitative study |
title | Feeling labeled, judged, lectured, and rejected by family and friends over depression: Cautionary results for primary care clinicians from a multi-centered, qualitative study |
title_full | Feeling labeled, judged, lectured, and rejected by family and friends over depression: Cautionary results for primary care clinicians from a multi-centered, qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Feeling labeled, judged, lectured, and rejected by family and friends over depression: Cautionary results for primary care clinicians from a multi-centered, qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Feeling labeled, judged, lectured, and rejected by family and friends over depression: Cautionary results for primary care clinicians from a multi-centered, qualitative study |
title_short | Feeling labeled, judged, lectured, and rejected by family and friends over depression: Cautionary results for primary care clinicians from a multi-centered, qualitative study |
title_sort | feeling labeled, judged, lectured, and rejected by family and friends over depression: cautionary results for primary care clinicians from a multi-centered, qualitative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3495682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22747989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-13-64 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fernandezygarciaerik feelinglabeledjudgedlecturedandrejectedbyfamilyandfriendsoverdepressioncautionaryresultsforprimarycarecliniciansfromamulticenteredqualitativestudy AT dubersteinpaul feelinglabeledjudgedlecturedandrejectedbyfamilyandfriendsoverdepressioncautionaryresultsforprimarycarecliniciansfromamulticenteredqualitativestudy AT paternitideboraa feelinglabeledjudgedlecturedandrejectedbyfamilyandfriendsoverdepressioncautionaryresultsforprimarycarecliniciansfromamulticenteredqualitativestudy AT cipricamilles feelinglabeledjudgedlecturedandrejectedbyfamilyandfriendsoverdepressioncautionaryresultsforprimarycarecliniciansfromamulticenteredqualitativestudy AT kravitzrichardl feelinglabeledjudgedlecturedandrejectedbyfamilyandfriendsoverdepressioncautionaryresultsforprimarycarecliniciansfromamulticenteredqualitativestudy AT epsteinronaldm feelinglabeledjudgedlecturedandrejectedbyfamilyandfriendsoverdepressioncautionaryresultsforprimarycarecliniciansfromamulticenteredqualitativestudy |