Cargando…

Comparing Linkage Designs Based on Land Facets to Linkage Designs Based on Focal Species

Least-cost modeling for focal species is the most widely used method for designing conservation corridors and linkages. However, these designs depend on today's land covers, which will be altered by climate change. We recently proposed an alternative approach based on land facets (recurring lan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brost, Brian M., Beier, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3495916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23152831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048965
_version_ 1782249590831972352
author Brost, Brian M.
Beier, Paul
author_facet Brost, Brian M.
Beier, Paul
author_sort Brost, Brian M.
collection PubMed
description Least-cost modeling for focal species is the most widely used method for designing conservation corridors and linkages. However, these designs depend on today's land covers, which will be altered by climate change. We recently proposed an alternative approach based on land facets (recurring landscape units of relatively uniform topography and soils). The rationale is that corridors with high continuity of individual land facets will facilitate movement of species associated with each facet today and in the future. Conservation practitioners might like to know whether a linkage design based on land facets is likely to provide continuity of modeled breeding habitat for species needing connectivity today, and whether a linkage for focal species provides continuity and interspersion of land facets. To address these questions, we compared linkages designed for focal species and land facets in three landscapes in Arizona, USA. We used two variables to measure linkage utility, namely distances between patches of modeled breeding habitat for 5–16 focal species in each linkage, and resistance profiles for focal species and land facets between patches connected by the linkage. Compared to focal species designs, linkage designs based on land facets provided as much or more modeled habitat connectivity for 25 of 28 species-landscape combinations, failing only for the three species with the most narrowly distributed habitat. Compared to land facets designs, focal species linkages provided lower connectivity for about half the land facets in two landscapes. In areas where a focal species approach to linkage design is not possible, our results suggest that conservation practitioners may be able to implement a land facets approach with some confidence that the linkage design would serve most potential focal species. In areas where focal species designs are possible, we recommend using the land facet approach to complement, rather than replace, focal species approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3495916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34959162012-11-14 Comparing Linkage Designs Based on Land Facets to Linkage Designs Based on Focal Species Brost, Brian M. Beier, Paul PLoS One Research Article Least-cost modeling for focal species is the most widely used method for designing conservation corridors and linkages. However, these designs depend on today's land covers, which will be altered by climate change. We recently proposed an alternative approach based on land facets (recurring landscape units of relatively uniform topography and soils). The rationale is that corridors with high continuity of individual land facets will facilitate movement of species associated with each facet today and in the future. Conservation practitioners might like to know whether a linkage design based on land facets is likely to provide continuity of modeled breeding habitat for species needing connectivity today, and whether a linkage for focal species provides continuity and interspersion of land facets. To address these questions, we compared linkages designed for focal species and land facets in three landscapes in Arizona, USA. We used two variables to measure linkage utility, namely distances between patches of modeled breeding habitat for 5–16 focal species in each linkage, and resistance profiles for focal species and land facets between patches connected by the linkage. Compared to focal species designs, linkage designs based on land facets provided as much or more modeled habitat connectivity for 25 of 28 species-landscape combinations, failing only for the three species with the most narrowly distributed habitat. Compared to land facets designs, focal species linkages provided lower connectivity for about half the land facets in two landscapes. In areas where a focal species approach to linkage design is not possible, our results suggest that conservation practitioners may be able to implement a land facets approach with some confidence that the linkage design would serve most potential focal species. In areas where focal species designs are possible, we recommend using the land facet approach to complement, rather than replace, focal species approaches. Public Library of Science 2012-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3495916/ /pubmed/23152831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048965 Text en © 2012 Brost and Beier http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brost, Brian M.
Beier, Paul
Comparing Linkage Designs Based on Land Facets to Linkage Designs Based on Focal Species
title Comparing Linkage Designs Based on Land Facets to Linkage Designs Based on Focal Species
title_full Comparing Linkage Designs Based on Land Facets to Linkage Designs Based on Focal Species
title_fullStr Comparing Linkage Designs Based on Land Facets to Linkage Designs Based on Focal Species
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Linkage Designs Based on Land Facets to Linkage Designs Based on Focal Species
title_short Comparing Linkage Designs Based on Land Facets to Linkage Designs Based on Focal Species
title_sort comparing linkage designs based on land facets to linkage designs based on focal species
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3495916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23152831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048965
work_keys_str_mv AT brostbrianm comparinglinkagedesignsbasedonlandfacetstolinkagedesignsbasedonfocalspecies
AT beierpaul comparinglinkagedesignsbasedonlandfacetstolinkagedesignsbasedonfocalspecies