Cargando…

Breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended BI-RADS(®) lexicon standards?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate mammography reports for diagnosed breast cancer cases in major government and private centers in Karachi, Pakistan, with respect to concordance with the Breast Imaging Reports And Data System (BI-RADS(®)) lexicon. METHODS: A prospective, descript...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masroor, Imrana, Azeemuddin, Muhammad, Sakhawat, Saima, Beg, Madiha, Sohail, Saba, Ahmed, Rashid, Irfan-Ul-Haq, Mehboob, Javed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3496367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23152703
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S36879
_version_ 1782249620653473792
author Masroor, Imrana
Azeemuddin, Muhammad
Sakhawat, Saima
Beg, Madiha
Sohail, Saba
Ahmed, Rashid
Irfan-Ul-Haq,
Mehboob, Javed
author_facet Masroor, Imrana
Azeemuddin, Muhammad
Sakhawat, Saima
Beg, Madiha
Sohail, Saba
Ahmed, Rashid
Irfan-Ul-Haq,
Mehboob, Javed
author_sort Masroor, Imrana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate mammography reports for diagnosed breast cancer cases in major government and private centers in Karachi, Pakistan, with respect to concordance with the Breast Imaging Reports And Data System (BI-RADS(®)) lexicon. METHODS: A prospective, descriptive, multicenter study was conducted in the radiology sections of the Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan Naval Station Shifa Hospital, Advanced Radiology Clinic, Karachi Institute of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, and Civil Hospital Karachi between May and October 2010 after approval from the ethical review committee of Aga Khan University. Mammograms reported as BI-RADS category 4 and 5 were included in the study. Mammograms reported as BI-RADS category 0, 1, 2 and 3 were excluded. Fifty reports were collected from each center. Data were collected about the clinical indication, breast density, location and description of the lesion, calcification, and comments on axillary lymph nodes. This description was compared with the BI-RADS lexicon. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 50 ± 12 years. The clinical indication, breast parenchymal density, lesion location, and presence of calcification were better described by the private centers, while description of lymph node status was better stated by the government centers. This difference was statistically significant, except for lesion description. The description of masses by the two reporting groups was comparable. CONCLUSION: Mammographic reporting of malignant breast lesions in the private sector is more in line with the BI-RADS lexicon, as compared with government sector hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. Lymph node documentation was better in government sector reports.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3496367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34963672012-11-14 Breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended BI-RADS(®) lexicon standards? Masroor, Imrana Azeemuddin, Muhammad Sakhawat, Saima Beg, Madiha Sohail, Saba Ahmed, Rashid Irfan-Ul-Haq, Mehboob, Javed Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate mammography reports for diagnosed breast cancer cases in major government and private centers in Karachi, Pakistan, with respect to concordance with the Breast Imaging Reports And Data System (BI-RADS(®)) lexicon. METHODS: A prospective, descriptive, multicenter study was conducted in the radiology sections of the Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan Naval Station Shifa Hospital, Advanced Radiology Clinic, Karachi Institute of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, and Civil Hospital Karachi between May and October 2010 after approval from the ethical review committee of Aga Khan University. Mammograms reported as BI-RADS category 4 and 5 were included in the study. Mammograms reported as BI-RADS category 0, 1, 2 and 3 were excluded. Fifty reports were collected from each center. Data were collected about the clinical indication, breast density, location and description of the lesion, calcification, and comments on axillary lymph nodes. This description was compared with the BI-RADS lexicon. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 50 ± 12 years. The clinical indication, breast parenchymal density, lesion location, and presence of calcification were better described by the private centers, while description of lymph node status was better stated by the government centers. This difference was statistically significant, except for lesion description. The description of masses by the two reporting groups was comparable. CONCLUSION: Mammographic reporting of malignant breast lesions in the private sector is more in line with the BI-RADS lexicon, as compared with government sector hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. Lymph node documentation was better in government sector reports. Dove Medical Press 2012-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3496367/ /pubmed/23152703 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S36879 Text en © 2012 Masroor et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Masroor, Imrana
Azeemuddin, Muhammad
Sakhawat, Saima
Beg, Madiha
Sohail, Saba
Ahmed, Rashid
Irfan-Ul-Haq,
Mehboob, Javed
Breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended BI-RADS(®) lexicon standards?
title Breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended BI-RADS(®) lexicon standards?
title_full Breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended BI-RADS(®) lexicon standards?
title_fullStr Breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended BI-RADS(®) lexicon standards?
title_full_unstemmed Breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended BI-RADS(®) lexicon standards?
title_short Breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended BI-RADS(®) lexicon standards?
title_sort breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended bi-rads(®) lexicon standards?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3496367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23152703
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S36879
work_keys_str_mv AT masroorimrana breastimagingreportsformalignantlesionsarewemaintainingrecommendedbiradslexiconstandards
AT azeemuddinmuhammad breastimagingreportsformalignantlesionsarewemaintainingrecommendedbiradslexiconstandards
AT sakhawatsaima breastimagingreportsformalignantlesionsarewemaintainingrecommendedbiradslexiconstandards
AT begmadiha breastimagingreportsformalignantlesionsarewemaintainingrecommendedbiradslexiconstandards
AT sohailsaba breastimagingreportsformalignantlesionsarewemaintainingrecommendedbiradslexiconstandards
AT ahmedrashid breastimagingreportsformalignantlesionsarewemaintainingrecommendedbiradslexiconstandards
AT irfanulhaq breastimagingreportsformalignantlesionsarewemaintainingrecommendedbiradslexiconstandards
AT mehboobjaved breastimagingreportsformalignantlesionsarewemaintainingrecommendedbiradslexiconstandards