Cargando…
Breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended BI-RADS(®) lexicon standards?
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate mammography reports for diagnosed breast cancer cases in major government and private centers in Karachi, Pakistan, with respect to concordance with the Breast Imaging Reports And Data System (BI-RADS(®)) lexicon. METHODS: A prospective, descript...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3496367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23152703 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S36879 |
_version_ | 1782249620653473792 |
---|---|
author | Masroor, Imrana Azeemuddin, Muhammad Sakhawat, Saima Beg, Madiha Sohail, Saba Ahmed, Rashid Irfan-Ul-Haq, Mehboob, Javed |
author_facet | Masroor, Imrana Azeemuddin, Muhammad Sakhawat, Saima Beg, Madiha Sohail, Saba Ahmed, Rashid Irfan-Ul-Haq, Mehboob, Javed |
author_sort | Masroor, Imrana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate mammography reports for diagnosed breast cancer cases in major government and private centers in Karachi, Pakistan, with respect to concordance with the Breast Imaging Reports And Data System (BI-RADS(®)) lexicon. METHODS: A prospective, descriptive, multicenter study was conducted in the radiology sections of the Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan Naval Station Shifa Hospital, Advanced Radiology Clinic, Karachi Institute of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, and Civil Hospital Karachi between May and October 2010 after approval from the ethical review committee of Aga Khan University. Mammograms reported as BI-RADS category 4 and 5 were included in the study. Mammograms reported as BI-RADS category 0, 1, 2 and 3 were excluded. Fifty reports were collected from each center. Data were collected about the clinical indication, breast density, location and description of the lesion, calcification, and comments on axillary lymph nodes. This description was compared with the BI-RADS lexicon. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 50 ± 12 years. The clinical indication, breast parenchymal density, lesion location, and presence of calcification were better described by the private centers, while description of lymph node status was better stated by the government centers. This difference was statistically significant, except for lesion description. The description of masses by the two reporting groups was comparable. CONCLUSION: Mammographic reporting of malignant breast lesions in the private sector is more in line with the BI-RADS lexicon, as compared with government sector hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. Lymph node documentation was better in government sector reports. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3496367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34963672012-11-14 Breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended BI-RADS(®) lexicon standards? Masroor, Imrana Azeemuddin, Muhammad Sakhawat, Saima Beg, Madiha Sohail, Saba Ahmed, Rashid Irfan-Ul-Haq, Mehboob, Javed Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate mammography reports for diagnosed breast cancer cases in major government and private centers in Karachi, Pakistan, with respect to concordance with the Breast Imaging Reports And Data System (BI-RADS(®)) lexicon. METHODS: A prospective, descriptive, multicenter study was conducted in the radiology sections of the Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan Naval Station Shifa Hospital, Advanced Radiology Clinic, Karachi Institute of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine, and Civil Hospital Karachi between May and October 2010 after approval from the ethical review committee of Aga Khan University. Mammograms reported as BI-RADS category 4 and 5 were included in the study. Mammograms reported as BI-RADS category 0, 1, 2 and 3 were excluded. Fifty reports were collected from each center. Data were collected about the clinical indication, breast density, location and description of the lesion, calcification, and comments on axillary lymph nodes. This description was compared with the BI-RADS lexicon. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 50 ± 12 years. The clinical indication, breast parenchymal density, lesion location, and presence of calcification were better described by the private centers, while description of lymph node status was better stated by the government centers. This difference was statistically significant, except for lesion description. The description of masses by the two reporting groups was comparable. CONCLUSION: Mammographic reporting of malignant breast lesions in the private sector is more in line with the BI-RADS lexicon, as compared with government sector hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. Lymph node documentation was better in government sector reports. Dove Medical Press 2012-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3496367/ /pubmed/23152703 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S36879 Text en © 2012 Masroor et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Masroor, Imrana Azeemuddin, Muhammad Sakhawat, Saima Beg, Madiha Sohail, Saba Ahmed, Rashid Irfan-Ul-Haq, Mehboob, Javed Breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended BI-RADS(®) lexicon standards? |
title | Breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended BI-RADS(®) lexicon standards? |
title_full | Breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended BI-RADS(®) lexicon standards? |
title_fullStr | Breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended BI-RADS(®) lexicon standards? |
title_full_unstemmed | Breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended BI-RADS(®) lexicon standards? |
title_short | Breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended BI-RADS(®) lexicon standards? |
title_sort | breast imaging reports for malignant lesions: are we maintaining recommended bi-rads(®) lexicon standards? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3496367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23152703 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S36879 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT masroorimrana breastimagingreportsformalignantlesionsarewemaintainingrecommendedbiradslexiconstandards AT azeemuddinmuhammad breastimagingreportsformalignantlesionsarewemaintainingrecommendedbiradslexiconstandards AT sakhawatsaima breastimagingreportsformalignantlesionsarewemaintainingrecommendedbiradslexiconstandards AT begmadiha breastimagingreportsformalignantlesionsarewemaintainingrecommendedbiradslexiconstandards AT sohailsaba breastimagingreportsformalignantlesionsarewemaintainingrecommendedbiradslexiconstandards AT ahmedrashid breastimagingreportsformalignantlesionsarewemaintainingrecommendedbiradslexiconstandards AT irfanulhaq breastimagingreportsformalignantlesionsarewemaintainingrecommendedbiradslexiconstandards AT mehboobjaved breastimagingreportsformalignantlesionsarewemaintainingrecommendedbiradslexiconstandards |