Cargando…

A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl(®)) with the ON-Q PainBuster(®) Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery

BACKGROUND: XaraColl(®), a collagen-based intraoperative implant that delivers bupivacaine to the site of surgical trauma, is under development for postoperative analgesia. We compared the efficacy and safety of XaraColl for the prevention of postsurgical pain versus a slow postoperative perfusion o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cusack, Susan L, Minkowitz, Harold S, Kuss, Michael, Jaros, Mark, Hemsen, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3496528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23152696
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S37310
_version_ 1782249630627528704
author Cusack, Susan L
Minkowitz, Harold S
Kuss, Michael
Jaros, Mark
Hemsen, Lisa
author_facet Cusack, Susan L
Minkowitz, Harold S
Kuss, Michael
Jaros, Mark
Hemsen, Lisa
author_sort Cusack, Susan L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: XaraColl(®), a collagen-based intraoperative implant that delivers bupivacaine to the site of surgical trauma, is under development for postoperative analgesia. We compared the efficacy and safety of XaraColl for the prevention of postsurgical pain versus a slow postoperative perfusion of bupivacaine to the wound environment via the ON-Q PainBuster(®) Post-op Pain Relief System (ON-Q). METHODS: We randomized 27 women undergoing open gynecological surgery to receive either three XaraColl implants (each containing 50 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride) or ON-Q (900 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride perfused over 72 hours) in a 1:1 ratio. Following surgery, patients had access to intravenous morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia pump as rescue analgesia for the first 24 hours and to oral opioid medication thereafter. Total use of opioid analgesia was compared through 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after surgery. Patients also evaluated overall pain control over the 96-hour period using a five-point numeric rating scale. Safety was assessed for 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: XaraColl was non-inferior to ON-Q in total use of opioid analgesia for the first 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after surgery, with a statistical trend towards reduced opioid use in favor of XaraColl over 24, 48, and 72 hours (P = 0.067, 0.100, and 0.089, respectively). The time to first use of opioid analgesia was also significantly delayed in patients treated with XaraColl (P = 0.024). There was no significant difference between groups in patients’ evaluation of pain control or their satisfaction with the treatment in general. Both treatments were considered safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Despite using only 17% of the ON-Q dose, XaraColl is as effective as ON-Q in providing postoperative analgesia for 4 days after open gynecological surgery. These preliminary findings suggest that XaraColl offers great potential for the management of postoperative pain and warrants further definitive studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3496528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34965282012-11-14 A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl(®)) with the ON-Q PainBuster(®) Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery Cusack, Susan L Minkowitz, Harold S Kuss, Michael Jaros, Mark Hemsen, Lisa J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: XaraColl(®), a collagen-based intraoperative implant that delivers bupivacaine to the site of surgical trauma, is under development for postoperative analgesia. We compared the efficacy and safety of XaraColl for the prevention of postsurgical pain versus a slow postoperative perfusion of bupivacaine to the wound environment via the ON-Q PainBuster(®) Post-op Pain Relief System (ON-Q). METHODS: We randomized 27 women undergoing open gynecological surgery to receive either three XaraColl implants (each containing 50 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride) or ON-Q (900 mg bupivacaine hydrochloride perfused over 72 hours) in a 1:1 ratio. Following surgery, patients had access to intravenous morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia pump as rescue analgesia for the first 24 hours and to oral opioid medication thereafter. Total use of opioid analgesia was compared through 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after surgery. Patients also evaluated overall pain control over the 96-hour period using a five-point numeric rating scale. Safety was assessed for 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: XaraColl was non-inferior to ON-Q in total use of opioid analgesia for the first 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after surgery, with a statistical trend towards reduced opioid use in favor of XaraColl over 24, 48, and 72 hours (P = 0.067, 0.100, and 0.089, respectively). The time to first use of opioid analgesia was also significantly delayed in patients treated with XaraColl (P = 0.024). There was no significant difference between groups in patients’ evaluation of pain control or their satisfaction with the treatment in general. Both treatments were considered safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Despite using only 17% of the ON-Q dose, XaraColl is as effective as ON-Q in providing postoperative analgesia for 4 days after open gynecological surgery. These preliminary findings suggest that XaraColl offers great potential for the management of postoperative pain and warrants further definitive studies. Dove Medical Press 2012-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3496528/ /pubmed/23152696 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S37310 Text en © 2012 Cusack et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cusack, Susan L
Minkowitz, Harold S
Kuss, Michael
Jaros, Mark
Hemsen, Lisa
A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl(®)) with the ON-Q PainBuster(®) Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery
title A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl(®)) with the ON-Q PainBuster(®) Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery
title_full A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl(®)) with the ON-Q PainBuster(®) Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery
title_fullStr A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl(®)) with the ON-Q PainBuster(®) Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery
title_full_unstemmed A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl(®)) with the ON-Q PainBuster(®) Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery
title_short A randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (XaraColl(®)) with the ON-Q PainBuster(®) Post-op Pain Relief System following open gynecological surgery
title_sort randomized, multicenter, pilot study comparing the efficacy and safety of a bupivacaine-collagen implant (xaracoll(®)) with the on-q painbuster(®) post-op pain relief system following open gynecological surgery
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3496528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23152696
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S37310
work_keys_str_mv AT cusacksusanl arandomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollwiththeonqpainbusterpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT minkowitzharolds arandomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollwiththeonqpainbusterpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT kussmichael arandomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollwiththeonqpainbusterpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT jarosmark arandomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollwiththeonqpainbusterpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT hemsenlisa arandomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollwiththeonqpainbusterpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT cusacksusanl randomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollwiththeonqpainbusterpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT minkowitzharolds randomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollwiththeonqpainbusterpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT kussmichael randomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollwiththeonqpainbusterpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT jarosmark randomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollwiththeonqpainbusterpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery
AT hemsenlisa randomizedmulticenterpilotstudycomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofabupivacainecollagenimplantxaracollwiththeonqpainbusterpostoppainreliefsystemfollowingopengynecologicalsurgery