Cargando…

The Impact of Heterogeneity and Dark Acceptor States on FRET: Implications for Using Fluorescent Protein Donors and Acceptors

Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy is widely used to study protein interactions in living cells. Typically, spectral variants of the Green Fluorescent Protein (FPs) are incorporated into proteins expressed in cells, and FRET between donor and acceptor FPs is assayed. As appreciable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vogel, Steven S., Nguyen, Tuan A., van der Meer, B. Wieb, Blank, Paul S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3496711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23152925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049593
_version_ 1782249668929912832
author Vogel, Steven S.
Nguyen, Tuan A.
van der Meer, B. Wieb
Blank, Paul S.
author_facet Vogel, Steven S.
Nguyen, Tuan A.
van der Meer, B. Wieb
Blank, Paul S.
author_sort Vogel, Steven S.
collection PubMed
description Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy is widely used to study protein interactions in living cells. Typically, spectral variants of the Green Fluorescent Protein (FPs) are incorporated into proteins expressed in cells, and FRET between donor and acceptor FPs is assayed. As appreciable FRET occurs only when donors and acceptors are within 10 nm of each other, the presence of FRET can be indicative of aggregation that may denote association of interacting species. By monitoring the excited-state (fluorescence) decay of the donor in the presence and absence of acceptors, dual-component decay analysis has been used to reveal the fraction of donors that are FRET positive (i.e., in aggregates)._However, control experiments using constructs containing both a donor and an acceptor FP on the same protein repeatedly indicate that a large fraction of these donors are FRET negative, thus rendering the interpretation of dual-component analysis for aggregates between separately donor-containing and acceptor-containing proteins problematic. Using Monte-Carlo simulations and analytical expressions, two possible sources for such anomalous behavior are explored: 1) conformational heterogeneity of the proteins, such that variations in the distance separating donor and acceptor FPs and/or their relative orientations persist on time-scales long in comparison with the excited-state lifetime, and 2) FP dark states.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3496711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34967112012-11-14 The Impact of Heterogeneity and Dark Acceptor States on FRET: Implications for Using Fluorescent Protein Donors and Acceptors Vogel, Steven S. Nguyen, Tuan A. van der Meer, B. Wieb Blank, Paul S. PLoS One Research Article Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy is widely used to study protein interactions in living cells. Typically, spectral variants of the Green Fluorescent Protein (FPs) are incorporated into proteins expressed in cells, and FRET between donor and acceptor FPs is assayed. As appreciable FRET occurs only when donors and acceptors are within 10 nm of each other, the presence of FRET can be indicative of aggregation that may denote association of interacting species. By monitoring the excited-state (fluorescence) decay of the donor in the presence and absence of acceptors, dual-component decay analysis has been used to reveal the fraction of donors that are FRET positive (i.e., in aggregates)._However, control experiments using constructs containing both a donor and an acceptor FP on the same protein repeatedly indicate that a large fraction of these donors are FRET negative, thus rendering the interpretation of dual-component analysis for aggregates between separately donor-containing and acceptor-containing proteins problematic. Using Monte-Carlo simulations and analytical expressions, two possible sources for such anomalous behavior are explored: 1) conformational heterogeneity of the proteins, such that variations in the distance separating donor and acceptor FPs and/or their relative orientations persist on time-scales long in comparison with the excited-state lifetime, and 2) FP dark states. Public Library of Science 2012-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3496711/ /pubmed/23152925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049593 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vogel, Steven S.
Nguyen, Tuan A.
van der Meer, B. Wieb
Blank, Paul S.
The Impact of Heterogeneity and Dark Acceptor States on FRET: Implications for Using Fluorescent Protein Donors and Acceptors
title The Impact of Heterogeneity and Dark Acceptor States on FRET: Implications for Using Fluorescent Protein Donors and Acceptors
title_full The Impact of Heterogeneity and Dark Acceptor States on FRET: Implications for Using Fluorescent Protein Donors and Acceptors
title_fullStr The Impact of Heterogeneity and Dark Acceptor States on FRET: Implications for Using Fluorescent Protein Donors and Acceptors
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Heterogeneity and Dark Acceptor States on FRET: Implications for Using Fluorescent Protein Donors and Acceptors
title_short The Impact of Heterogeneity and Dark Acceptor States on FRET: Implications for Using Fluorescent Protein Donors and Acceptors
title_sort impact of heterogeneity and dark acceptor states on fret: implications for using fluorescent protein donors and acceptors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3496711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23152925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049593
work_keys_str_mv AT vogelstevens theimpactofheterogeneityanddarkacceptorstatesonfretimplicationsforusingfluorescentproteindonorsandacceptors
AT nguyentuana theimpactofheterogeneityanddarkacceptorstatesonfretimplicationsforusingfluorescentproteindonorsandacceptors
AT vandermeerbwieb theimpactofheterogeneityanddarkacceptorstatesonfretimplicationsforusingfluorescentproteindonorsandacceptors
AT blankpauls theimpactofheterogeneityanddarkacceptorstatesonfretimplicationsforusingfluorescentproteindonorsandacceptors
AT vogelstevens impactofheterogeneityanddarkacceptorstatesonfretimplicationsforusingfluorescentproteindonorsandacceptors
AT nguyentuana impactofheterogeneityanddarkacceptorstatesonfretimplicationsforusingfluorescentproteindonorsandacceptors
AT vandermeerbwieb impactofheterogeneityanddarkacceptorstatesonfretimplicationsforusingfluorescentproteindonorsandacceptors
AT blankpauls impactofheterogeneityanddarkacceptorstatesonfretimplicationsforusingfluorescentproteindonorsandacceptors