Cargando…

Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping

BACKGROUND: The increasing trend for incorporation of biological sample collection within clinical trials requires sample collection procedures which are convenient and acceptable for both patients and clinicians. This study investigated the feasibility of using saliva-extracted DNA in comparison to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abraham, Jean E, Maranian, Mel J, Spiteri, Inmaculada, Russell, Roslin, Ingle, Susan, Luccarini, Craig, Earl, Helena M, Pharoah, Paul PD, Dunning, Alison M, Caldas, Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3497576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22647440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-5-19
_version_ 1782249748890124288
author Abraham, Jean E
Maranian, Mel J
Spiteri, Inmaculada
Russell, Roslin
Ingle, Susan
Luccarini, Craig
Earl, Helena M
Pharoah, Paul PD
Dunning, Alison M
Caldas, Carlos
author_facet Abraham, Jean E
Maranian, Mel J
Spiteri, Inmaculada
Russell, Roslin
Ingle, Susan
Luccarini, Craig
Earl, Helena M
Pharoah, Paul PD
Dunning, Alison M
Caldas, Carlos
author_sort Abraham, Jean E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The increasing trend for incorporation of biological sample collection within clinical trials requires sample collection procedures which are convenient and acceptable for both patients and clinicians. This study investigated the feasibility of using saliva-extracted DNA in comparison to blood-derived DNA, across two genotyping platforms: Applied Biosystems Taqman(TM) and Illumina Beadchip(TM) genome-wide arrays. METHOD: Patients were recruited from the Pharmacogenetics of Breast Cancer Chemotherapy (PGSNPS) study. Paired blood and saliva samples were collected from 79 study participants. The Oragene DNA Self-Collection kit (DNAgenotek®) was used to collect and extract DNA from saliva. DNA from EDTA blood samples (median volume 8 ml) was extracted by Gen-Probe, Livingstone, UK. DNA yields, standard measures of DNA quality, genotype call rates and genotype concordance between paired, duplicated samples were assessed. RESULTS: Total DNA yields were lower from saliva (mean 24 μg, range 0.2–52 μg) than from blood (mean 210 μg, range 58–577 μg) and a 2-fold difference remained after adjusting for the volume of biological material collected. Protein contamination and DNA fragmentation measures were greater in saliva DNA. 78/79 saliva samples yielded sufficient DNA for use on Illumina Beadchip arrays and using Taqman assays. Four samples were randomly selected for genotyping in duplicate on the Illumina Beadchip arrays. All samples were genotyped using Taqman assays. DNA quality, as assessed by genotype call rates and genotype concordance between matched pairs of DNA was high (>97%) for each measure in both blood and saliva-derived DNA. CONCLUSION: We conclude that DNA from saliva and blood samples is comparable when genotyping using either Taqman assays or genome-wide chip arrays. Saliva sampling has the potential to increase participant recruitment within clinical trials, as well as reducing the resources and organisation required for multicentre sample collection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3497576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34975762012-11-15 Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping Abraham, Jean E Maranian, Mel J Spiteri, Inmaculada Russell, Roslin Ingle, Susan Luccarini, Craig Earl, Helena M Pharoah, Paul PD Dunning, Alison M Caldas, Carlos BMC Med Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: The increasing trend for incorporation of biological sample collection within clinical trials requires sample collection procedures which are convenient and acceptable for both patients and clinicians. This study investigated the feasibility of using saliva-extracted DNA in comparison to blood-derived DNA, across two genotyping platforms: Applied Biosystems Taqman(TM) and Illumina Beadchip(TM) genome-wide arrays. METHOD: Patients were recruited from the Pharmacogenetics of Breast Cancer Chemotherapy (PGSNPS) study. Paired blood and saliva samples were collected from 79 study participants. The Oragene DNA Self-Collection kit (DNAgenotek®) was used to collect and extract DNA from saliva. DNA from EDTA blood samples (median volume 8 ml) was extracted by Gen-Probe, Livingstone, UK. DNA yields, standard measures of DNA quality, genotype call rates and genotype concordance between paired, duplicated samples were assessed. RESULTS: Total DNA yields were lower from saliva (mean 24 μg, range 0.2–52 μg) than from blood (mean 210 μg, range 58–577 μg) and a 2-fold difference remained after adjusting for the volume of biological material collected. Protein contamination and DNA fragmentation measures were greater in saliva DNA. 78/79 saliva samples yielded sufficient DNA for use on Illumina Beadchip arrays and using Taqman assays. Four samples were randomly selected for genotyping in duplicate on the Illumina Beadchip arrays. All samples were genotyped using Taqman assays. DNA quality, as assessed by genotype call rates and genotype concordance between matched pairs of DNA was high (>97%) for each measure in both blood and saliva-derived DNA. CONCLUSION: We conclude that DNA from saliva and blood samples is comparable when genotyping using either Taqman assays or genome-wide chip arrays. Saliva sampling has the potential to increase participant recruitment within clinical trials, as well as reducing the resources and organisation required for multicentre sample collection. BioMed Central 2012-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3497576/ /pubmed/22647440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-5-19 Text en Copyright ©2012 Abraham et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abraham, Jean E
Maranian, Mel J
Spiteri, Inmaculada
Russell, Roslin
Ingle, Susan
Luccarini, Craig
Earl, Helena M
Pharoah, Paul PD
Dunning, Alison M
Caldas, Carlos
Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping
title Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping
title_full Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping
title_fullStr Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping
title_full_unstemmed Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping
title_short Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping
title_sort saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of dna for high throughput genotyping
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3497576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22647440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-5-19
work_keys_str_mv AT abrahamjeane salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping
AT maranianmelj salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping
AT spiteriinmaculada salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping
AT russellroslin salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping
AT inglesusan salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping
AT luccarinicraig salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping
AT earlhelenam salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping
AT pharoahpaulpd salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping
AT dunningalisonm salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping
AT caldascarlos salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping