Cargando…
Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping
BACKGROUND: The increasing trend for incorporation of biological sample collection within clinical trials requires sample collection procedures which are convenient and acceptable for both patients and clinicians. This study investigated the feasibility of using saliva-extracted DNA in comparison to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3497576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22647440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-5-19 |
_version_ | 1782249748890124288 |
---|---|
author | Abraham, Jean E Maranian, Mel J Spiteri, Inmaculada Russell, Roslin Ingle, Susan Luccarini, Craig Earl, Helena M Pharoah, Paul PD Dunning, Alison M Caldas, Carlos |
author_facet | Abraham, Jean E Maranian, Mel J Spiteri, Inmaculada Russell, Roslin Ingle, Susan Luccarini, Craig Earl, Helena M Pharoah, Paul PD Dunning, Alison M Caldas, Carlos |
author_sort | Abraham, Jean E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The increasing trend for incorporation of biological sample collection within clinical trials requires sample collection procedures which are convenient and acceptable for both patients and clinicians. This study investigated the feasibility of using saliva-extracted DNA in comparison to blood-derived DNA, across two genotyping platforms: Applied Biosystems Taqman(TM) and Illumina Beadchip(TM) genome-wide arrays. METHOD: Patients were recruited from the Pharmacogenetics of Breast Cancer Chemotherapy (PGSNPS) study. Paired blood and saliva samples were collected from 79 study participants. The Oragene DNA Self-Collection kit (DNAgenotek®) was used to collect and extract DNA from saliva. DNA from EDTA blood samples (median volume 8 ml) was extracted by Gen-Probe, Livingstone, UK. DNA yields, standard measures of DNA quality, genotype call rates and genotype concordance between paired, duplicated samples were assessed. RESULTS: Total DNA yields were lower from saliva (mean 24 μg, range 0.2–52 μg) than from blood (mean 210 μg, range 58–577 μg) and a 2-fold difference remained after adjusting for the volume of biological material collected. Protein contamination and DNA fragmentation measures were greater in saliva DNA. 78/79 saliva samples yielded sufficient DNA for use on Illumina Beadchip arrays and using Taqman assays. Four samples were randomly selected for genotyping in duplicate on the Illumina Beadchip arrays. All samples were genotyped using Taqman assays. DNA quality, as assessed by genotype call rates and genotype concordance between matched pairs of DNA was high (>97%) for each measure in both blood and saliva-derived DNA. CONCLUSION: We conclude that DNA from saliva and blood samples is comparable when genotyping using either Taqman assays or genome-wide chip arrays. Saliva sampling has the potential to increase participant recruitment within clinical trials, as well as reducing the resources and organisation required for multicentre sample collection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3497576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34975762012-11-15 Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping Abraham, Jean E Maranian, Mel J Spiteri, Inmaculada Russell, Roslin Ingle, Susan Luccarini, Craig Earl, Helena M Pharoah, Paul PD Dunning, Alison M Caldas, Carlos BMC Med Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: The increasing trend for incorporation of biological sample collection within clinical trials requires sample collection procedures which are convenient and acceptable for both patients and clinicians. This study investigated the feasibility of using saliva-extracted DNA in comparison to blood-derived DNA, across two genotyping platforms: Applied Biosystems Taqman(TM) and Illumina Beadchip(TM) genome-wide arrays. METHOD: Patients were recruited from the Pharmacogenetics of Breast Cancer Chemotherapy (PGSNPS) study. Paired blood and saliva samples were collected from 79 study participants. The Oragene DNA Self-Collection kit (DNAgenotek®) was used to collect and extract DNA from saliva. DNA from EDTA blood samples (median volume 8 ml) was extracted by Gen-Probe, Livingstone, UK. DNA yields, standard measures of DNA quality, genotype call rates and genotype concordance between paired, duplicated samples were assessed. RESULTS: Total DNA yields were lower from saliva (mean 24 μg, range 0.2–52 μg) than from blood (mean 210 μg, range 58–577 μg) and a 2-fold difference remained after adjusting for the volume of biological material collected. Protein contamination and DNA fragmentation measures were greater in saliva DNA. 78/79 saliva samples yielded sufficient DNA for use on Illumina Beadchip arrays and using Taqman assays. Four samples were randomly selected for genotyping in duplicate on the Illumina Beadchip arrays. All samples were genotyped using Taqman assays. DNA quality, as assessed by genotype call rates and genotype concordance between matched pairs of DNA was high (>97%) for each measure in both blood and saliva-derived DNA. CONCLUSION: We conclude that DNA from saliva and blood samples is comparable when genotyping using either Taqman assays or genome-wide chip arrays. Saliva sampling has the potential to increase participant recruitment within clinical trials, as well as reducing the resources and organisation required for multicentre sample collection. BioMed Central 2012-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3497576/ /pubmed/22647440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-5-19 Text en Copyright ©2012 Abraham et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Abraham, Jean E Maranian, Mel J Spiteri, Inmaculada Russell, Roslin Ingle, Susan Luccarini, Craig Earl, Helena M Pharoah, Paul PD Dunning, Alison M Caldas, Carlos Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping |
title | Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping |
title_full | Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping |
title_fullStr | Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping |
title_full_unstemmed | Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping |
title_short | Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping |
title_sort | saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of dna for high throughput genotyping |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3497576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22647440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-5-19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abrahamjeane salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping AT maranianmelj salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping AT spiteriinmaculada salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping AT russellroslin salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping AT inglesusan salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping AT luccarinicraig salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping AT earlhelenam salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping AT pharoahpaulpd salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping AT dunningalisonm salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping AT caldascarlos salivasamplesareaviablealternativetobloodsamplesasasourceofdnaforhighthroughputgenotyping |