Cargando…

Systematic Review of Teleneurology: Methodology

Background: The use of two-way audio-visual technology for delivery of acute stroke is supported by a well established literature base. The use of telemedicine for general neurologic consultation has been reported across most subspecialties within the field, but a comprehensive systematic review of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rubin, Mark N., Wellik, Kay E., Channer, Dwight D., Demaerschalk, Bart M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3497715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162527
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00156
_version_ 1782249757481107456
author Rubin, Mark N.
Wellik, Kay E.
Channer, Dwight D.
Demaerschalk, Bart M.
author_facet Rubin, Mark N.
Wellik, Kay E.
Channer, Dwight D.
Demaerschalk, Bart M.
author_sort Rubin, Mark N.
collection PubMed
description Background: The use of two-way audio-visual technology for delivery of acute stroke is supported by a well established literature base. The use of telemedicine for general neurologic consultation has been reported across most subspecialties within the field, but a comprehensive systematic review of these reports is lacking. Purpose: To conduct a systematic review of the published literature on teleneurologic consultation beyond stroke. Data sources: Databases Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane were searched with keywords, “teleneurology,” and numerous synonyms and cross-referenced with neurology subspecialties. The search yielded 6,615 potentially eligible hits, which were independently reviewed by two investigators. Ultimately 375 unique studies met eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Study selection: Studies were included if the title or abstract expressed use of two-way AV communication for a clinical neurologic indication other than stroke. Data extraction: Each article was classified using a novel scoring rubric to assess the level of functionality, application, technology, and evaluative stage. Data analysis: Articles were hierarchized within a subspecialty category. Overall subspecialty scores were assigned based on aggregate of scores across papers in each category. Conclusion: Use of telemedicine for general and most subspecialty neurologic consultation, beyond stroke, appears very promising but the clinical science is nascent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3497715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34977152012-11-16 Systematic Review of Teleneurology: Methodology Rubin, Mark N. Wellik, Kay E. Channer, Dwight D. Demaerschalk, Bart M. Front Neurol Neuroscience Background: The use of two-way audio-visual technology for delivery of acute stroke is supported by a well established literature base. The use of telemedicine for general neurologic consultation has been reported across most subspecialties within the field, but a comprehensive systematic review of these reports is lacking. Purpose: To conduct a systematic review of the published literature on teleneurologic consultation beyond stroke. Data sources: Databases Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane were searched with keywords, “teleneurology,” and numerous synonyms and cross-referenced with neurology subspecialties. The search yielded 6,615 potentially eligible hits, which were independently reviewed by two investigators. Ultimately 375 unique studies met eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Study selection: Studies were included if the title or abstract expressed use of two-way AV communication for a clinical neurologic indication other than stroke. Data extraction: Each article was classified using a novel scoring rubric to assess the level of functionality, application, technology, and evaluative stage. Data analysis: Articles were hierarchized within a subspecialty category. Overall subspecialty scores were assigned based on aggregate of scores across papers in each category. Conclusion: Use of telemedicine for general and most subspecialty neurologic consultation, beyond stroke, appears very promising but the clinical science is nascent. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3497715/ /pubmed/23162527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00156 Text en Copyright © 2012 Rubin, Wellik, Channer and Demaerschalk. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Rubin, Mark N.
Wellik, Kay E.
Channer, Dwight D.
Demaerschalk, Bart M.
Systematic Review of Teleneurology: Methodology
title Systematic Review of Teleneurology: Methodology
title_full Systematic Review of Teleneurology: Methodology
title_fullStr Systematic Review of Teleneurology: Methodology
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of Teleneurology: Methodology
title_short Systematic Review of Teleneurology: Methodology
title_sort systematic review of teleneurology: methodology
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3497715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162527
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00156
work_keys_str_mv AT rubinmarkn systematicreviewofteleneurologymethodology
AT wellikkaye systematicreviewofteleneurologymethodology
AT channerdwightd systematicreviewofteleneurologymethodology
AT demaerschalkbartm systematicreviewofteleneurologymethodology