Cargando…
Systematic Review of Teleneurology: Methodology
Background: The use of two-way audio-visual technology for delivery of acute stroke is supported by a well established literature base. The use of telemedicine for general neurologic consultation has been reported across most subspecialties within the field, but a comprehensive systematic review of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3497715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00156 |
_version_ | 1782249757481107456 |
---|---|
author | Rubin, Mark N. Wellik, Kay E. Channer, Dwight D. Demaerschalk, Bart M. |
author_facet | Rubin, Mark N. Wellik, Kay E. Channer, Dwight D. Demaerschalk, Bart M. |
author_sort | Rubin, Mark N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The use of two-way audio-visual technology for delivery of acute stroke is supported by a well established literature base. The use of telemedicine for general neurologic consultation has been reported across most subspecialties within the field, but a comprehensive systematic review of these reports is lacking. Purpose: To conduct a systematic review of the published literature on teleneurologic consultation beyond stroke. Data sources: Databases Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane were searched with keywords, “teleneurology,” and numerous synonyms and cross-referenced with neurology subspecialties. The search yielded 6,615 potentially eligible hits, which were independently reviewed by two investigators. Ultimately 375 unique studies met eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Study selection: Studies were included if the title or abstract expressed use of two-way AV communication for a clinical neurologic indication other than stroke. Data extraction: Each article was classified using a novel scoring rubric to assess the level of functionality, application, technology, and evaluative stage. Data analysis: Articles were hierarchized within a subspecialty category. Overall subspecialty scores were assigned based on aggregate of scores across papers in each category. Conclusion: Use of telemedicine for general and most subspecialty neurologic consultation, beyond stroke, appears very promising but the clinical science is nascent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3497715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34977152012-11-16 Systematic Review of Teleneurology: Methodology Rubin, Mark N. Wellik, Kay E. Channer, Dwight D. Demaerschalk, Bart M. Front Neurol Neuroscience Background: The use of two-way audio-visual technology for delivery of acute stroke is supported by a well established literature base. The use of telemedicine for general neurologic consultation has been reported across most subspecialties within the field, but a comprehensive systematic review of these reports is lacking. Purpose: To conduct a systematic review of the published literature on teleneurologic consultation beyond stroke. Data sources: Databases Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane were searched with keywords, “teleneurology,” and numerous synonyms and cross-referenced with neurology subspecialties. The search yielded 6,615 potentially eligible hits, which were independently reviewed by two investigators. Ultimately 375 unique studies met eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Study selection: Studies were included if the title or abstract expressed use of two-way AV communication for a clinical neurologic indication other than stroke. Data extraction: Each article was classified using a novel scoring rubric to assess the level of functionality, application, technology, and evaluative stage. Data analysis: Articles were hierarchized within a subspecialty category. Overall subspecialty scores were assigned based on aggregate of scores across papers in each category. Conclusion: Use of telemedicine for general and most subspecialty neurologic consultation, beyond stroke, appears very promising but the clinical science is nascent. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3497715/ /pubmed/23162527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00156 Text en Copyright © 2012 Rubin, Wellik, Channer and Demaerschalk. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Rubin, Mark N. Wellik, Kay E. Channer, Dwight D. Demaerschalk, Bart M. Systematic Review of Teleneurology: Methodology |
title | Systematic Review of Teleneurology: Methodology |
title_full | Systematic Review of Teleneurology: Methodology |
title_fullStr | Systematic Review of Teleneurology: Methodology |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Review of Teleneurology: Methodology |
title_short | Systematic Review of Teleneurology: Methodology |
title_sort | systematic review of teleneurology: methodology |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3497715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2012.00156 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rubinmarkn systematicreviewofteleneurologymethodology AT wellikkaye systematicreviewofteleneurologymethodology AT channerdwightd systematicreviewofteleneurologymethodology AT demaerschalkbartm systematicreviewofteleneurologymethodology |