Cargando…

The impact of initial statin treatment decisions on cardiovascular outcomes in clinical care settings: estimates using the Archimedes Model

PURPOSE: Many patients treated for dyslipidemia do not achieve recommended cholesterol goals despite the widespread availability of effective statins. Pharmaceutical claims show a strong tendency for patients to remain on their initially assigned treatment. With computer simulations, the impact of i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Herick, Andrew, Schuetz, C Andy, Alperin, Peter, Bullano, Michael F, Balu, Sanjeev, Gandhi, Sanjay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3497874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23180970
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S35487
_version_ 1782249769229352960
author van Herick, Andrew
Schuetz, C Andy
Alperin, Peter
Bullano, Michael F
Balu, Sanjeev
Gandhi, Sanjay
author_facet van Herick, Andrew
Schuetz, C Andy
Alperin, Peter
Bullano, Michael F
Balu, Sanjeev
Gandhi, Sanjay
author_sort van Herick, Andrew
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Many patients treated for dyslipidemia do not achieve recommended cholesterol goals despite the widespread availability of effective statins. Pharmaceutical claims show a strong tendency for patients to remain on their initially assigned treatment. With computer simulations, the impact of initial statin treatment decisions on medium- and long-term cardiovascular outcomes were examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the Archimedes Model, three treatment scenarios were simulated. Patients initiated treatment with simvastatin (20, 40, or 80 mg), atorvastatin (10, 20, 40, or 80 mg), or rosuvastatin (10, 20, or 40 mg), and periodically intensified treatment. The simulated population consisted of 50,025 patients, aged 45–70 years, with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol exceeding goal. The proportion of patients initiating each dose was calibrated to United States pharmacy claims. Patients not reaching goal intensified the dose of their current statin or switched to an appropriate dose of rosuvastatin at rates matching pharmacy claims. Biomarkers and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were tracked for 10 years and several high-risk subpopulations were analyzed. Statin models used biomarker effects from the STELLAR (Statin Therapies for Elevated Lipid Levels Compared Across Doses to Rosuvastatin) trial and outcomes data from various trials. RESULTS: Initiating therapy with rosuvastatin reduced MACE more than simvastatin or atorvastatin. The 5- year relative risk of MACE was 0.906 (95% confidence interval: 0.888–0.923; P < 0.001) for initial treatment with atorvastatin rather than simvastatin, 0.831 (0.812–0.850; P < 0.001) for rosuvastatin rather than simvastatin, and 0.918 (0.898–0.938; P < 0.001) for rosuvastatin rather than atorvastatin. Subgroups with higher MACE incidence experienced greater absolute benefit. CONCLUSION: Considering observed rates of treatment intensification, initial treatment choices appear to significantly impact medium- and long-term cardiovascular risk. Patients at high cardiovascular risk are good candidates for aggressive initial therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3497874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34978742012-11-23 The impact of initial statin treatment decisions on cardiovascular outcomes in clinical care settings: estimates using the Archimedes Model van Herick, Andrew Schuetz, C Andy Alperin, Peter Bullano, Michael F Balu, Sanjeev Gandhi, Sanjay Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research PURPOSE: Many patients treated for dyslipidemia do not achieve recommended cholesterol goals despite the widespread availability of effective statins. Pharmaceutical claims show a strong tendency for patients to remain on their initially assigned treatment. With computer simulations, the impact of initial statin treatment decisions on medium- and long-term cardiovascular outcomes were examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the Archimedes Model, three treatment scenarios were simulated. Patients initiated treatment with simvastatin (20, 40, or 80 mg), atorvastatin (10, 20, 40, or 80 mg), or rosuvastatin (10, 20, or 40 mg), and periodically intensified treatment. The simulated population consisted of 50,025 patients, aged 45–70 years, with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol exceeding goal. The proportion of patients initiating each dose was calibrated to United States pharmacy claims. Patients not reaching goal intensified the dose of their current statin or switched to an appropriate dose of rosuvastatin at rates matching pharmacy claims. Biomarkers and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were tracked for 10 years and several high-risk subpopulations were analyzed. Statin models used biomarker effects from the STELLAR (Statin Therapies for Elevated Lipid Levels Compared Across Doses to Rosuvastatin) trial and outcomes data from various trials. RESULTS: Initiating therapy with rosuvastatin reduced MACE more than simvastatin or atorvastatin. The 5- year relative risk of MACE was 0.906 (95% confidence interval: 0.888–0.923; P < 0.001) for initial treatment with atorvastatin rather than simvastatin, 0.831 (0.812–0.850; P < 0.001) for rosuvastatin rather than simvastatin, and 0.918 (0.898–0.938; P < 0.001) for rosuvastatin rather than atorvastatin. Subgroups with higher MACE incidence experienced greater absolute benefit. CONCLUSION: Considering observed rates of treatment intensification, initial treatment choices appear to significantly impact medium- and long-term cardiovascular risk. Patients at high cardiovascular risk are good candidates for aggressive initial therapy. Dove Medical Press 2012-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3497874/ /pubmed/23180970 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S35487 Text en © 2012 van Herick et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
van Herick, Andrew
Schuetz, C Andy
Alperin, Peter
Bullano, Michael F
Balu, Sanjeev
Gandhi, Sanjay
The impact of initial statin treatment decisions on cardiovascular outcomes in clinical care settings: estimates using the Archimedes Model
title The impact of initial statin treatment decisions on cardiovascular outcomes in clinical care settings: estimates using the Archimedes Model
title_full The impact of initial statin treatment decisions on cardiovascular outcomes in clinical care settings: estimates using the Archimedes Model
title_fullStr The impact of initial statin treatment decisions on cardiovascular outcomes in clinical care settings: estimates using the Archimedes Model
title_full_unstemmed The impact of initial statin treatment decisions on cardiovascular outcomes in clinical care settings: estimates using the Archimedes Model
title_short The impact of initial statin treatment decisions on cardiovascular outcomes in clinical care settings: estimates using the Archimedes Model
title_sort impact of initial statin treatment decisions on cardiovascular outcomes in clinical care settings: estimates using the archimedes model
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3497874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23180970
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S35487
work_keys_str_mv AT vanherickandrew theimpactofinitialstatintreatmentdecisionsoncardiovascularoutcomesinclinicalcaresettingsestimatesusingthearchimedesmodel
AT schuetzcandy theimpactofinitialstatintreatmentdecisionsoncardiovascularoutcomesinclinicalcaresettingsestimatesusingthearchimedesmodel
AT alperinpeter theimpactofinitialstatintreatmentdecisionsoncardiovascularoutcomesinclinicalcaresettingsestimatesusingthearchimedesmodel
AT bullanomichaelf theimpactofinitialstatintreatmentdecisionsoncardiovascularoutcomesinclinicalcaresettingsestimatesusingthearchimedesmodel
AT balusanjeev theimpactofinitialstatintreatmentdecisionsoncardiovascularoutcomesinclinicalcaresettingsestimatesusingthearchimedesmodel
AT gandhisanjay theimpactofinitialstatintreatmentdecisionsoncardiovascularoutcomesinclinicalcaresettingsestimatesusingthearchimedesmodel
AT vanherickandrew impactofinitialstatintreatmentdecisionsoncardiovascularoutcomesinclinicalcaresettingsestimatesusingthearchimedesmodel
AT schuetzcandy impactofinitialstatintreatmentdecisionsoncardiovascularoutcomesinclinicalcaresettingsestimatesusingthearchimedesmodel
AT alperinpeter impactofinitialstatintreatmentdecisionsoncardiovascularoutcomesinclinicalcaresettingsestimatesusingthearchimedesmodel
AT bullanomichaelf impactofinitialstatintreatmentdecisionsoncardiovascularoutcomesinclinicalcaresettingsestimatesusingthearchimedesmodel
AT balusanjeev impactofinitialstatintreatmentdecisionsoncardiovascularoutcomesinclinicalcaresettingsestimatesusingthearchimedesmodel
AT gandhisanjay impactofinitialstatintreatmentdecisionsoncardiovascularoutcomesinclinicalcaresettingsestimatesusingthearchimedesmodel