Cargando…

Catching What We Can't See: Manual Interception of Occluded Fly-Ball Trajectories

Control of interceptive actions may involve fine interplay between feedback-based and predictive mechanisms. These processes rely heavily on target motion information available when the target is visible. However, short-term visual memory signals as well as implicit knowledge about the environment m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosco, Gianfranco, Delle Monache, Sergio, Lacquaniti, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23166653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049381
_version_ 1782249794043904000
author Bosco, Gianfranco
Delle Monache, Sergio
Lacquaniti, Francesco
author_facet Bosco, Gianfranco
Delle Monache, Sergio
Lacquaniti, Francesco
author_sort Bosco, Gianfranco
collection PubMed
description Control of interceptive actions may involve fine interplay between feedback-based and predictive mechanisms. These processes rely heavily on target motion information available when the target is visible. However, short-term visual memory signals as well as implicit knowledge about the environment may also contribute to elaborate a predictive representation of the target trajectory, especially when visual feedback is partially unavailable because other objects occlude the visual target. To determine how different processes and information sources are integrated in the control of the interceptive action, we manipulated a computer-generated visual environment representing a baseball game. Twenty-four subjects intercepted fly-ball trajectories by moving a mouse cursor and by indicating the interception with a button press. In two separate sessions, fly-ball trajectories were either fully visible or occluded for 750, 1000 or 1250 ms before ball landing. Natural ball motion was perturbed during the descending trajectory with effects of either weightlessness (0 g) or increased gravity (2 g) at times such that, for occluded trajectories, 500 ms of perturbed motion were visible before ball disappearance. To examine the contribution of previous visual experience with the perturbed trajectories to the interception of invisible targets, the order of visible and occluded sessions was permuted among subjects. Under these experimental conditions, we showed that, with fully visible targets, subjects combined servo-control and predictive strategies. Instead, when intercepting occluded targets, subjects relied mostly on predictive mechanisms based, however, on different type of information depending on previous visual experience. In fact, subjects without prior experience of the perturbed trajectories showed interceptive errors consistent with predictive estimates of the ball trajectory based on a-priori knowledge of gravity. Conversely, the interceptive responses of subjects previously exposed to fully visible trajectories were compatible with the fact that implicit knowledge of the perturbed motion was also taken into account for the extrapolation of occluded trajectories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3498163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34981632012-11-19 Catching What We Can't See: Manual Interception of Occluded Fly-Ball Trajectories Bosco, Gianfranco Delle Monache, Sergio Lacquaniti, Francesco PLoS One Research Article Control of interceptive actions may involve fine interplay between feedback-based and predictive mechanisms. These processes rely heavily on target motion information available when the target is visible. However, short-term visual memory signals as well as implicit knowledge about the environment may also contribute to elaborate a predictive representation of the target trajectory, especially when visual feedback is partially unavailable because other objects occlude the visual target. To determine how different processes and information sources are integrated in the control of the interceptive action, we manipulated a computer-generated visual environment representing a baseball game. Twenty-four subjects intercepted fly-ball trajectories by moving a mouse cursor and by indicating the interception with a button press. In two separate sessions, fly-ball trajectories were either fully visible or occluded for 750, 1000 or 1250 ms before ball landing. Natural ball motion was perturbed during the descending trajectory with effects of either weightlessness (0 g) or increased gravity (2 g) at times such that, for occluded trajectories, 500 ms of perturbed motion were visible before ball disappearance. To examine the contribution of previous visual experience with the perturbed trajectories to the interception of invisible targets, the order of visible and occluded sessions was permuted among subjects. Under these experimental conditions, we showed that, with fully visible targets, subjects combined servo-control and predictive strategies. Instead, when intercepting occluded targets, subjects relied mostly on predictive mechanisms based, however, on different type of information depending on previous visual experience. In fact, subjects without prior experience of the perturbed trajectories showed interceptive errors consistent with predictive estimates of the ball trajectory based on a-priori knowledge of gravity. Conversely, the interceptive responses of subjects previously exposed to fully visible trajectories were compatible with the fact that implicit knowledge of the perturbed motion was also taken into account for the extrapolation of occluded trajectories. Public Library of Science 2012-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3498163/ /pubmed/23166653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049381 Text en © 2012 Bosco et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bosco, Gianfranco
Delle Monache, Sergio
Lacquaniti, Francesco
Catching What We Can't See: Manual Interception of Occluded Fly-Ball Trajectories
title Catching What We Can't See: Manual Interception of Occluded Fly-Ball Trajectories
title_full Catching What We Can't See: Manual Interception of Occluded Fly-Ball Trajectories
title_fullStr Catching What We Can't See: Manual Interception of Occluded Fly-Ball Trajectories
title_full_unstemmed Catching What We Can't See: Manual Interception of Occluded Fly-Ball Trajectories
title_short Catching What We Can't See: Manual Interception of Occluded Fly-Ball Trajectories
title_sort catching what we can't see: manual interception of occluded fly-ball trajectories
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23166653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049381
work_keys_str_mv AT boscogianfranco catchingwhatwecantseemanualinterceptionofoccludedflyballtrajectories
AT dellemonachesergio catchingwhatwecantseemanualinterceptionofoccludedflyballtrajectories
AT lacquanitifrancesco catchingwhatwecantseemanualinterceptionofoccludedflyballtrajectories