Cargando…

Bats in a Farming Landscape Benefit from Linear Remnants and Unimproved Pastures

Schemes designed to make farming landscapes less hostile to wildlife have been questioned because target taxa do not always respond in the expected manner. Microbats are often overlooked in this process, yet persist in agricultural landscapes and exert top-down control of crop pests. We investigated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lentini, Pia E., Gibbons, Philip, Fischer, Joern, Law, Brad, Hanspach, Jan, Martin, Tara G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23155378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048201
_version_ 1782249812798734336
author Lentini, Pia E.
Gibbons, Philip
Fischer, Joern
Law, Brad
Hanspach, Jan
Martin, Tara G.
author_facet Lentini, Pia E.
Gibbons, Philip
Fischer, Joern
Law, Brad
Hanspach, Jan
Martin, Tara G.
author_sort Lentini, Pia E.
collection PubMed
description Schemes designed to make farming landscapes less hostile to wildlife have been questioned because target taxa do not always respond in the expected manner. Microbats are often overlooked in this process, yet persist in agricultural landscapes and exert top-down control of crop pests. We investigated the relationship between microbats and measures commonly incorporated into agri-environment schemes, to derive management recommendations for their ongoing conservation. We used acoustic detectors to quantify bat species richness, activity, and feeding in 32 linear remnants and adjacent fields across an agricultural region of New South Wales, Australia. Nocturnal arthropods were simultaneously trapped using black-light traps. We recorded 91,969 bat calls, 17,277 of which could be attributed to one of the 13 taxa recorded, and 491 calls contained feeding buzzes. The linear remnants supported higher bat activity than the fields, but species richness and feeding activity did not significantly differ. We trapped a mean 87.6 g (±17.6 g SE) of arthropods per night, but found no differences in biomass between land uses. Wider linear remnants with intact native vegetation supported more bat species, as did those adjacent to unsealed, as opposed to sealed roads. Fields of unimproved native pastures, with more retained scattered trees and associated hollows and logs, supported the greatest bat species richness and activity. We conclude that the juxtaposition of linear remnants of intact vegetation and scattered trees in fields, coupled with less-intensive land uses such as unimproved pastures will benefit bat communities in agricultural landscapes, and should be incorporated into agri-environment schemes. In contrast, sealed roads may act as a deterrent. The “wildlife friendly farming” vs “land sparing” debate has so far primarily focussed on birds, but here we have found evidence that the integration of both approaches could particularly benefit bats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3498260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34982602012-11-15 Bats in a Farming Landscape Benefit from Linear Remnants and Unimproved Pastures Lentini, Pia E. Gibbons, Philip Fischer, Joern Law, Brad Hanspach, Jan Martin, Tara G. PLoS One Research Article Schemes designed to make farming landscapes less hostile to wildlife have been questioned because target taxa do not always respond in the expected manner. Microbats are often overlooked in this process, yet persist in agricultural landscapes and exert top-down control of crop pests. We investigated the relationship between microbats and measures commonly incorporated into agri-environment schemes, to derive management recommendations for their ongoing conservation. We used acoustic detectors to quantify bat species richness, activity, and feeding in 32 linear remnants and adjacent fields across an agricultural region of New South Wales, Australia. Nocturnal arthropods were simultaneously trapped using black-light traps. We recorded 91,969 bat calls, 17,277 of which could be attributed to one of the 13 taxa recorded, and 491 calls contained feeding buzzes. The linear remnants supported higher bat activity than the fields, but species richness and feeding activity did not significantly differ. We trapped a mean 87.6 g (±17.6 g SE) of arthropods per night, but found no differences in biomass between land uses. Wider linear remnants with intact native vegetation supported more bat species, as did those adjacent to unsealed, as opposed to sealed roads. Fields of unimproved native pastures, with more retained scattered trees and associated hollows and logs, supported the greatest bat species richness and activity. We conclude that the juxtaposition of linear remnants of intact vegetation and scattered trees in fields, coupled with less-intensive land uses such as unimproved pastures will benefit bat communities in agricultural landscapes, and should be incorporated into agri-environment schemes. In contrast, sealed roads may act as a deterrent. The “wildlife friendly farming” vs “land sparing” debate has so far primarily focussed on birds, but here we have found evidence that the integration of both approaches could particularly benefit bats. Public Library of Science 2012-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3498260/ /pubmed/23155378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048201 Text en © 2012 Lentini et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lentini, Pia E.
Gibbons, Philip
Fischer, Joern
Law, Brad
Hanspach, Jan
Martin, Tara G.
Bats in a Farming Landscape Benefit from Linear Remnants and Unimproved Pastures
title Bats in a Farming Landscape Benefit from Linear Remnants and Unimproved Pastures
title_full Bats in a Farming Landscape Benefit from Linear Remnants and Unimproved Pastures
title_fullStr Bats in a Farming Landscape Benefit from Linear Remnants and Unimproved Pastures
title_full_unstemmed Bats in a Farming Landscape Benefit from Linear Remnants and Unimproved Pastures
title_short Bats in a Farming Landscape Benefit from Linear Remnants and Unimproved Pastures
title_sort bats in a farming landscape benefit from linear remnants and unimproved pastures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23155378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048201
work_keys_str_mv AT lentinipiae batsinafarminglandscapebenefitfromlinearremnantsandunimprovedpastures
AT gibbonsphilip batsinafarminglandscapebenefitfromlinearremnantsandunimprovedpastures
AT fischerjoern batsinafarminglandscapebenefitfromlinearremnantsandunimprovedpastures
AT lawbrad batsinafarminglandscapebenefitfromlinearremnantsandunimprovedpastures
AT hanspachjan batsinafarminglandscapebenefitfromlinearremnantsandunimprovedpastures
AT martintarag batsinafarminglandscapebenefitfromlinearremnantsandunimprovedpastures