Cargando…

Early versus Delayed Insertion of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Abortion — A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Today, a large proportion of early abortions are medical terminations, in accordance to the woman's choice. Intrauterine contraceptives (IUC) provide highly effective, reversible, long-acting contraception. However, the effects of timing of IUC insertion after medical abortion are n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sääv, Ingrid, Stephansson, Olof, Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23155432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048948
_version_ 1782249829108285440
author Sääv, Ingrid
Stephansson, Olof
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
author_facet Sääv, Ingrid
Stephansson, Olof
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
author_sort Sääv, Ingrid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Today, a large proportion of early abortions are medical terminations, in accordance to the woman's choice. Intrauterine contraceptives (IUC) provide highly effective, reversible, long-acting contraception. However, the effects of timing of IUC insertion after medical abortion are not known. METHODS: Women undergoing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol up to 63 days gestation and opting for IUC were randomised to early insertion (day 5–9 after mifepristone) or delayed (routine) insertion (at 3–4 weeks after mifepristone). The primary outcome was the rate of IUC expulsion at six months after IUC insertion. RESULTS: A total of 129 women were randomized, and 116 women had a successful IUC insertion. There was no difference in expulsion rate between early (9.7%) vs. delayed (7.4%) IUC insertion (risk difference −9.2–13.4). Furthermore, 1.5% of women randomized to early and 11.5% to delayed insertion did not attend the follow up (proportion difference 10.0%, 95% CI: 1.8–20.6%, p = 0.015), and a higher proportion of women (41%) had had unprotected intercourse prior to returning for insertion in the delayed group compared with the early group (16%) (p = 0.015). Adverse events were rare and did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early insertion of IUC after medical abortion was safe and well tolerated with no increased incidence for expulsions or complications. Women were more likely to return for the IUC insertion if scheduled early after the abortion, and less likely to have had an unprotected intercourse prior to the IUC insertion. Early insertion should be offered as a routine for women undergoing first trimester medical abortion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01537562
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3498342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34983422012-11-15 Early versus Delayed Insertion of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Abortion — A Randomized Controlled Trial Sääv, Ingrid Stephansson, Olof Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Today, a large proportion of early abortions are medical terminations, in accordance to the woman's choice. Intrauterine contraceptives (IUC) provide highly effective, reversible, long-acting contraception. However, the effects of timing of IUC insertion after medical abortion are not known. METHODS: Women undergoing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol up to 63 days gestation and opting for IUC were randomised to early insertion (day 5–9 after mifepristone) or delayed (routine) insertion (at 3–4 weeks after mifepristone). The primary outcome was the rate of IUC expulsion at six months after IUC insertion. RESULTS: A total of 129 women were randomized, and 116 women had a successful IUC insertion. There was no difference in expulsion rate between early (9.7%) vs. delayed (7.4%) IUC insertion (risk difference −9.2–13.4). Furthermore, 1.5% of women randomized to early and 11.5% to delayed insertion did not attend the follow up (proportion difference 10.0%, 95% CI: 1.8–20.6%, p = 0.015), and a higher proportion of women (41%) had had unprotected intercourse prior to returning for insertion in the delayed group compared with the early group (16%) (p = 0.015). Adverse events were rare and did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early insertion of IUC after medical abortion was safe and well tolerated with no increased incidence for expulsions or complications. Women were more likely to return for the IUC insertion if scheduled early after the abortion, and less likely to have had an unprotected intercourse prior to the IUC insertion. Early insertion should be offered as a routine for women undergoing first trimester medical abortion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01537562 Public Library of Science 2012-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3498342/ /pubmed/23155432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048948 Text en © 2012 Sääv et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sääv, Ingrid
Stephansson, Olof
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
Early versus Delayed Insertion of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Abortion — A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Early versus Delayed Insertion of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Abortion — A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Early versus Delayed Insertion of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Abortion — A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Early versus Delayed Insertion of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Abortion — A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Early versus Delayed Insertion of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Abortion — A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Early versus Delayed Insertion of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Abortion — A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort early versus delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after medical abortion — a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23155432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048948
work_keys_str_mv AT saavingrid earlyversusdelayedinsertionofintrauterinecontraceptionaftermedicalabortionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stephanssonolof earlyversusdelayedinsertionofintrauterinecontraceptionaftermedicalabortionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gemzelldanielssonkristina earlyversusdelayedinsertionofintrauterinecontraceptionaftermedicalabortionarandomizedcontrolledtrial