Cargando…

Anatomical and Visual Outcomes of Three Different Scleral Buckling Techniques

PURPOSE: To compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of three different scleral buckling techniques and to explore the effect of cryotherapy and subretinal fluid drainage (SRFD) on outcomes of surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed on 111 eyes of 109 patients undergoing scleral b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banaee, Touka, Hosseini, S. Maryam, Ghooshkhanei, Haleh, Moosavi, Mirnaghi, Khayyatzadeh-Kakhki, Simin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ophthalmic Research Center 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23198054
_version_ 1782249839296249856
author Banaee, Touka
Hosseini, S. Maryam
Ghooshkhanei, Haleh
Moosavi, Mirnaghi
Khayyatzadeh-Kakhki, Simin
author_facet Banaee, Touka
Hosseini, S. Maryam
Ghooshkhanei, Haleh
Moosavi, Mirnaghi
Khayyatzadeh-Kakhki, Simin
author_sort Banaee, Touka
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of three different scleral buckling techniques and to explore the effect of cryotherapy and subretinal fluid drainage (SRFD) on outcomes of surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed on 111 eyes of 109 patients undergoing scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) by a single surgeon. Pre-, intra- and postoperative data were retrieved from hospital records. RESULTS: Buckles were radial in 27 (24.3%), circumferential (segmental) in 16 (14.4%) and encircling in 68 (61.3%) eyes. Anatomical and visual results were comparable with all three buckling techniques. Application of cryotherapy, the spot number, and SRFD did not affect anatomical and visual results. The only preoperative factor associated with poorer anatomical results was the presence of multiple retinal breaks (P=0.006). The following preoperative factors affected visual outcomes on univariate analysis: extent of retinal detachment (r=0.417, P=0.011) and relative afferent pupillary defect (r=0.423, P=0.02). Preoperative macular status (attached vs detached) also had a significant effect on visual outcomes (P<0.001). Based on multivariate analysis however, only preoperative macular status was significantly correlated with visual results (P=0.022). Silicone sponges placed for non-encircling surgery were removed due to ocular dysmotility in 4 (3.6%) eyes, cosmetic reasons in 3 (2.7%) cases and extrusion in 2 (1.8%) eyes. One encircling tire was also removed due to extrusion. CONCLUSION: Surgical technique and performing cryotherapy or SRFD do not seem to influence the anatomical and visual outcomes of scleral buckling. Postoperative complications seem to be more prevalent with non-encircling techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3498555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Ophthalmic Research Center
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34985552012-11-29 Anatomical and Visual Outcomes of Three Different Scleral Buckling Techniques Banaee, Touka Hosseini, S. Maryam Ghooshkhanei, Haleh Moosavi, Mirnaghi Khayyatzadeh-Kakhki, Simin J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of three different scleral buckling techniques and to explore the effect of cryotherapy and subretinal fluid drainage (SRFD) on outcomes of surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed on 111 eyes of 109 patients undergoing scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) by a single surgeon. Pre-, intra- and postoperative data were retrieved from hospital records. RESULTS: Buckles were radial in 27 (24.3%), circumferential (segmental) in 16 (14.4%) and encircling in 68 (61.3%) eyes. Anatomical and visual results were comparable with all three buckling techniques. Application of cryotherapy, the spot number, and SRFD did not affect anatomical and visual results. The only preoperative factor associated with poorer anatomical results was the presence of multiple retinal breaks (P=0.006). The following preoperative factors affected visual outcomes on univariate analysis: extent of retinal detachment (r=0.417, P=0.011) and relative afferent pupillary defect (r=0.423, P=0.02). Preoperative macular status (attached vs detached) also had a significant effect on visual outcomes (P<0.001). Based on multivariate analysis however, only preoperative macular status was significantly correlated with visual results (P=0.022). Silicone sponges placed for non-encircling surgery were removed due to ocular dysmotility in 4 (3.6%) eyes, cosmetic reasons in 3 (2.7%) cases and extrusion in 2 (1.8%) eyes. One encircling tire was also removed due to extrusion. CONCLUSION: Surgical technique and performing cryotherapy or SRFD do not seem to influence the anatomical and visual outcomes of scleral buckling. Postoperative complications seem to be more prevalent with non-encircling techniques. Ophthalmic Research Center 2009-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3498555/ /pubmed/23198054 Text en
spellingShingle Original Article
Banaee, Touka
Hosseini, S. Maryam
Ghooshkhanei, Haleh
Moosavi, Mirnaghi
Khayyatzadeh-Kakhki, Simin
Anatomical and Visual Outcomes of Three Different Scleral Buckling Techniques
title Anatomical and Visual Outcomes of Three Different Scleral Buckling Techniques
title_full Anatomical and Visual Outcomes of Three Different Scleral Buckling Techniques
title_fullStr Anatomical and Visual Outcomes of Three Different Scleral Buckling Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Anatomical and Visual Outcomes of Three Different Scleral Buckling Techniques
title_short Anatomical and Visual Outcomes of Three Different Scleral Buckling Techniques
title_sort anatomical and visual outcomes of three different scleral buckling techniques
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23198054
work_keys_str_mv AT banaeetouka anatomicalandvisualoutcomesofthreedifferentscleralbucklingtechniques
AT hosseinismaryam anatomicalandvisualoutcomesofthreedifferentscleralbucklingtechniques
AT ghooshkhaneihaleh anatomicalandvisualoutcomesofthreedifferentscleralbucklingtechniques
AT moosavimirnaghi anatomicalandvisualoutcomesofthreedifferentscleralbucklingtechniques
AT khayyatzadehkakhkisimin anatomicalandvisualoutcomesofthreedifferentscleralbucklingtechniques