Cargando…

Prosodic Cues to Word Order: What Level of Representation?

Within language, systematic correlations exist between syntactic structure and prosody. Prosodic prominence, for instance, falls on the complement and not the head of syntactic phrases, and its realization depends on the phrasal position of the prominent element. Thus, in Japanese, a functor-final l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernard, Carline, Gervain, Judit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162500
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00451
_version_ 1782249885177741312
author Bernard, Carline
Gervain, Judit
author_facet Bernard, Carline
Gervain, Judit
author_sort Bernard, Carline
collection PubMed
description Within language, systematic correlations exist between syntactic structure and prosody. Prosodic prominence, for instance, falls on the complement and not the head of syntactic phrases, and its realization depends on the phrasal position of the prominent element. Thus, in Japanese, a functor-final language, prominence is phrase-initial, and realized as increased pitch (^ Tōkyō ni “Tokyo to”), whereas in French, English, or Italian, functor-initial languages, it manifests itself as phrase-final lengthening (to Rome). Prosody is readily available in the linguistic signal even to the youngest infants. It has, therefore, been proposed that young learners might be able to exploit its correlations with syntax to bootstrap language structure. In this study, we tested this hypothesis, investigating how 8-month-old monolingual French infants processed an artificial grammar manipulating the relative position of prosodic prominence and word frequency. In Condition 1, we created a speech stream in which the two cues, prosody and frequency, were aligned, frequent words being prosodically non-prominent and infrequent ones being prominent, as is the case in natural language (functors are prosodically minimal compared to content words). In Condition 2, the two cues were misaligned, with frequent words carrying prosodic prominence, unlike in natural language. After familiarization with the aligned or the misaligned stream in a headturn preference procedure, we tested infants’ preference for test items having a frequent word initial or a frequent word final word order. We found that infants’ familiarized with the aligned stream showed the expected preference for the frequent word initial test items, mimicking the functor-initial word order of French. Infants in the misaligned condition showed no preference. These results suggest that infants are able to use word frequency and prosody as early cues to word order and they integrate them into a coherent representation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3498870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34988702012-11-16 Prosodic Cues to Word Order: What Level of Representation? Bernard, Carline Gervain, Judit Front Psychol Psychology Within language, systematic correlations exist between syntactic structure and prosody. Prosodic prominence, for instance, falls on the complement and not the head of syntactic phrases, and its realization depends on the phrasal position of the prominent element. Thus, in Japanese, a functor-final language, prominence is phrase-initial, and realized as increased pitch (^ Tōkyō ni “Tokyo to”), whereas in French, English, or Italian, functor-initial languages, it manifests itself as phrase-final lengthening (to Rome). Prosody is readily available in the linguistic signal even to the youngest infants. It has, therefore, been proposed that young learners might be able to exploit its correlations with syntax to bootstrap language structure. In this study, we tested this hypothesis, investigating how 8-month-old monolingual French infants processed an artificial grammar manipulating the relative position of prosodic prominence and word frequency. In Condition 1, we created a speech stream in which the two cues, prosody and frequency, were aligned, frequent words being prosodically non-prominent and infrequent ones being prominent, as is the case in natural language (functors are prosodically minimal compared to content words). In Condition 2, the two cues were misaligned, with frequent words carrying prosodic prominence, unlike in natural language. After familiarization with the aligned or the misaligned stream in a headturn preference procedure, we tested infants’ preference for test items having a frequent word initial or a frequent word final word order. We found that infants’ familiarized with the aligned stream showed the expected preference for the frequent word initial test items, mimicking the functor-initial word order of French. Infants in the misaligned condition showed no preference. These results suggest that infants are able to use word frequency and prosody as early cues to word order and they integrate them into a coherent representation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3498870/ /pubmed/23162500 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00451 Text en Copyright © 2012 Bernard and Gervain. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychology
Bernard, Carline
Gervain, Judit
Prosodic Cues to Word Order: What Level of Representation?
title Prosodic Cues to Word Order: What Level of Representation?
title_full Prosodic Cues to Word Order: What Level of Representation?
title_fullStr Prosodic Cues to Word Order: What Level of Representation?
title_full_unstemmed Prosodic Cues to Word Order: What Level of Representation?
title_short Prosodic Cues to Word Order: What Level of Representation?
title_sort prosodic cues to word order: what level of representation?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162500
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00451
work_keys_str_mv AT bernardcarline prosodiccuestowordorderwhatlevelofrepresentation
AT gervainjudit prosodiccuestowordorderwhatlevelofrepresentation