Cargando…

Intentional Suppression Can Lead to a Reduction of Memory Strength: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Findings

Previous research has shown that the intentional suppression of unwanted memories can lead to forgetting in later memory tests. However, the mechanisms underlying this effect remain unclear. This study employed recognition memory testing and event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate whether int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waldhauser, Gerd T., Lindgren, Magnus, Johansson, Mikael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162489
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00401
_version_ 1782249889367851008
author Waldhauser, Gerd T.
Lindgren, Magnus
Johansson, Mikael
author_facet Waldhauser, Gerd T.
Lindgren, Magnus
Johansson, Mikael
author_sort Waldhauser, Gerd T.
collection PubMed
description Previous research has shown that the intentional suppression of unwanted memories can lead to forgetting in later memory tests. However, the mechanisms underlying this effect remain unclear. This study employed recognition memory testing and event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate whether intentional suppression leads to the inhibition of memory representations at an item level. In a think/no-think experiment, participants were cued to either suppress (no-think condition) or retrieve (think condition) previously learned words, 18 or 0 times. Performance in a final recognition test was significantly reduced for repeatedly suppressed no-think items when compared to the baseline, zero-repetition condition. ERPs recorded during the suppression of no-think items were significantly more negative-going in a time window around 300 ms when compared to ERPs in the think condition. This reduction correlated with later recognition memory impairment. Furthermore, ERPs to no-think items from 225 to 450 ms were more negative-going in later phases of the experiment, suggesting a gradual reduction of memory strength with repeated suppression attempts. These effects were dissociable from correlates of recollection (500–600 ms) and inhibitory control (450–500 ms) that did not vary over the time-course of the experiment and appeared to be under strategic control. Our results give strong evidence that the no-think manipulation involves inhibition of memory representations at an item level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3498896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34988962012-11-16 Intentional Suppression Can Lead to a Reduction of Memory Strength: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Findings Waldhauser, Gerd T. Lindgren, Magnus Johansson, Mikael Front Psychol Psychology Previous research has shown that the intentional suppression of unwanted memories can lead to forgetting in later memory tests. However, the mechanisms underlying this effect remain unclear. This study employed recognition memory testing and event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate whether intentional suppression leads to the inhibition of memory representations at an item level. In a think/no-think experiment, participants were cued to either suppress (no-think condition) or retrieve (think condition) previously learned words, 18 or 0 times. Performance in a final recognition test was significantly reduced for repeatedly suppressed no-think items when compared to the baseline, zero-repetition condition. ERPs recorded during the suppression of no-think items were significantly more negative-going in a time window around 300 ms when compared to ERPs in the think condition. This reduction correlated with later recognition memory impairment. Furthermore, ERPs to no-think items from 225 to 450 ms were more negative-going in later phases of the experiment, suggesting a gradual reduction of memory strength with repeated suppression attempts. These effects were dissociable from correlates of recollection (500–600 ms) and inhibitory control (450–500 ms) that did not vary over the time-course of the experiment and appeared to be under strategic control. Our results give strong evidence that the no-think manipulation involves inhibition of memory representations at an item level. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3498896/ /pubmed/23162489 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00401 Text en Copyright © 2012 Waldhauser, Lindgren and Johansson. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychology
Waldhauser, Gerd T.
Lindgren, Magnus
Johansson, Mikael
Intentional Suppression Can Lead to a Reduction of Memory Strength: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Findings
title Intentional Suppression Can Lead to a Reduction of Memory Strength: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Findings
title_full Intentional Suppression Can Lead to a Reduction of Memory Strength: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Findings
title_fullStr Intentional Suppression Can Lead to a Reduction of Memory Strength: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Findings
title_full_unstemmed Intentional Suppression Can Lead to a Reduction of Memory Strength: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Findings
title_short Intentional Suppression Can Lead to a Reduction of Memory Strength: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Findings
title_sort intentional suppression can lead to a reduction of memory strength: behavioral and electrophysiological findings
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162489
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00401
work_keys_str_mv AT waldhausergerdt intentionalsuppressioncanleadtoareductionofmemorystrengthbehavioralandelectrophysiologicalfindings
AT lindgrenmagnus intentionalsuppressioncanleadtoareductionofmemorystrengthbehavioralandelectrophysiologicalfindings
AT johanssonmikael intentionalsuppressioncanleadtoareductionofmemorystrengthbehavioralandelectrophysiologicalfindings