Cargando…
Identifying Sources of Configurality in Three Face Processing Tasks
Participants performed three feature-complete face processing tasks involving detection of changes in: (1) feature size and (2) feature identity in successive matching tasks, and (3) feature orientation. In each experiment, information in the top (eyes) and bottom (mouths) parts of faces were manipu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00456 |
_version_ | 1782249894845612032 |
---|---|
author | Mestry, Natalie Menneer, Tamaryn Wenger, Michael J. Donnelly, Nick |
author_facet | Mestry, Natalie Menneer, Tamaryn Wenger, Michael J. Donnelly, Nick |
author_sort | Mestry, Natalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Participants performed three feature-complete face processing tasks involving detection of changes in: (1) feature size and (2) feature identity in successive matching tasks, and (3) feature orientation. In each experiment, information in the top (eyes) and bottom (mouths) parts of faces were manipulated. All tasks were performed with upright and inverted faces. Data were analyzed first using group-based analysis of signal detection measures (sensitivity and bias), and second using analysis of multidimensional measures of sensitivity and bias along with probit regression models in order to draw inferences about independence and separability as defined within general recognition theory (Ashby and Townsend, 1986). The results highlighted different patterns of perceptual and decisional influences across tasks and orientations. There was evidence of orientation specific configural effects (violations of perceptual independence, perceptual seperability and decisional separabilty) in the Feature Orientation Task. For the Feature Identity Task there were orientation specific performance effects and there was evidence of configural effects (violations of decisional separability) in both orientations. Decisional effects are consistent with previous research (Wenger and Ingvalson, 2002, 2003; Richler et al., 2008; Cornes et al., 2011). Crucially, the probit analysis revealed violations of perceptual independence that remain undetected by marginal analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3498960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34989602012-11-16 Identifying Sources of Configurality in Three Face Processing Tasks Mestry, Natalie Menneer, Tamaryn Wenger, Michael J. Donnelly, Nick Front Psychol Psychology Participants performed three feature-complete face processing tasks involving detection of changes in: (1) feature size and (2) feature identity in successive matching tasks, and (3) feature orientation. In each experiment, information in the top (eyes) and bottom (mouths) parts of faces were manipulated. All tasks were performed with upright and inverted faces. Data were analyzed first using group-based analysis of signal detection measures (sensitivity and bias), and second using analysis of multidimensional measures of sensitivity and bias along with probit regression models in order to draw inferences about independence and separability as defined within general recognition theory (Ashby and Townsend, 1986). The results highlighted different patterns of perceptual and decisional influences across tasks and orientations. There was evidence of orientation specific configural effects (violations of perceptual independence, perceptual seperability and decisional separabilty) in the Feature Orientation Task. For the Feature Identity Task there were orientation specific performance effects and there was evidence of configural effects (violations of decisional separability) in both orientations. Decisional effects are consistent with previous research (Wenger and Ingvalson, 2002, 2003; Richler et al., 2008; Cornes et al., 2011). Crucially, the probit analysis revealed violations of perceptual independence that remain undetected by marginal analysis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3498960/ /pubmed/23162505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00456 Text en Copyright © 2012 Mestry, Menneer, Wenger and Donnelly. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Mestry, Natalie Menneer, Tamaryn Wenger, Michael J. Donnelly, Nick Identifying Sources of Configurality in Three Face Processing Tasks |
title | Identifying Sources of Configurality in Three Face Processing Tasks |
title_full | Identifying Sources of Configurality in Three Face Processing Tasks |
title_fullStr | Identifying Sources of Configurality in Three Face Processing Tasks |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying Sources of Configurality in Three Face Processing Tasks |
title_short | Identifying Sources of Configurality in Three Face Processing Tasks |
title_sort | identifying sources of configurality in three face processing tasks |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00456 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mestrynatalie identifyingsourcesofconfiguralityinthreefaceprocessingtasks AT menneertamaryn identifyingsourcesofconfiguralityinthreefaceprocessingtasks AT wengermichaelj identifyingsourcesofconfiguralityinthreefaceprocessingtasks AT donnellynick identifyingsourcesofconfiguralityinthreefaceprocessingtasks |