Cargando…

Identifying Sources of Configurality in Three Face Processing Tasks

Participants performed three feature-complete face processing tasks involving detection of changes in: (1) feature size and (2) feature identity in successive matching tasks, and (3) feature orientation. In each experiment, information in the top (eyes) and bottom (mouths) parts of faces were manipu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mestry, Natalie, Menneer, Tamaryn, Wenger, Michael J., Donnelly, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162505
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00456
_version_ 1782249894845612032
author Mestry, Natalie
Menneer, Tamaryn
Wenger, Michael J.
Donnelly, Nick
author_facet Mestry, Natalie
Menneer, Tamaryn
Wenger, Michael J.
Donnelly, Nick
author_sort Mestry, Natalie
collection PubMed
description Participants performed three feature-complete face processing tasks involving detection of changes in: (1) feature size and (2) feature identity in successive matching tasks, and (3) feature orientation. In each experiment, information in the top (eyes) and bottom (mouths) parts of faces were manipulated. All tasks were performed with upright and inverted faces. Data were analyzed first using group-based analysis of signal detection measures (sensitivity and bias), and second using analysis of multidimensional measures of sensitivity and bias along with probit regression models in order to draw inferences about independence and separability as defined within general recognition theory (Ashby and Townsend, 1986). The results highlighted different patterns of perceptual and decisional influences across tasks and orientations. There was evidence of orientation specific configural effects (violations of perceptual independence, perceptual seperability and decisional separabilty) in the Feature Orientation Task. For the Feature Identity Task there were orientation specific performance effects and there was evidence of configural effects (violations of decisional separability) in both orientations. Decisional effects are consistent with previous research (Wenger and Ingvalson, 2002, 2003; Richler et al., 2008; Cornes et al., 2011). Crucially, the probit analysis revealed violations of perceptual independence that remain undetected by marginal analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3498960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34989602012-11-16 Identifying Sources of Configurality in Three Face Processing Tasks Mestry, Natalie Menneer, Tamaryn Wenger, Michael J. Donnelly, Nick Front Psychol Psychology Participants performed three feature-complete face processing tasks involving detection of changes in: (1) feature size and (2) feature identity in successive matching tasks, and (3) feature orientation. In each experiment, information in the top (eyes) and bottom (mouths) parts of faces were manipulated. All tasks were performed with upright and inverted faces. Data were analyzed first using group-based analysis of signal detection measures (sensitivity and bias), and second using analysis of multidimensional measures of sensitivity and bias along with probit regression models in order to draw inferences about independence and separability as defined within general recognition theory (Ashby and Townsend, 1986). The results highlighted different patterns of perceptual and decisional influences across tasks and orientations. There was evidence of orientation specific configural effects (violations of perceptual independence, perceptual seperability and decisional separabilty) in the Feature Orientation Task. For the Feature Identity Task there were orientation specific performance effects and there was evidence of configural effects (violations of decisional separability) in both orientations. Decisional effects are consistent with previous research (Wenger and Ingvalson, 2002, 2003; Richler et al., 2008; Cornes et al., 2011). Crucially, the probit analysis revealed violations of perceptual independence that remain undetected by marginal analysis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3498960/ /pubmed/23162505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00456 Text en Copyright © 2012 Mestry, Menneer, Wenger and Donnelly. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychology
Mestry, Natalie
Menneer, Tamaryn
Wenger, Michael J.
Donnelly, Nick
Identifying Sources of Configurality in Three Face Processing Tasks
title Identifying Sources of Configurality in Three Face Processing Tasks
title_full Identifying Sources of Configurality in Three Face Processing Tasks
title_fullStr Identifying Sources of Configurality in Three Face Processing Tasks
title_full_unstemmed Identifying Sources of Configurality in Three Face Processing Tasks
title_short Identifying Sources of Configurality in Three Face Processing Tasks
title_sort identifying sources of configurality in three face processing tasks
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162505
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00456
work_keys_str_mv AT mestrynatalie identifyingsourcesofconfiguralityinthreefaceprocessingtasks
AT menneertamaryn identifyingsourcesofconfiguralityinthreefaceprocessingtasks
AT wengermichaelj identifyingsourcesofconfiguralityinthreefaceprocessingtasks
AT donnellynick identifyingsourcesofconfiguralityinthreefaceprocessingtasks