Cargando…

Moving Forward in Space and Time: How Strong is the Conceptual Link between Spatial and Temporal Frames of Reference?

People often use spatial vocabulary to describe temporal relations, and this increasingly has motivated attempts to map spatial frames of reference (FoRs) onto time. Recent research suggested that speech communities, which differ in how they conceptualize space, may also differ in how they conceptua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bender, Andrea, Rothe-Wulf, Annelie, Hüther, Lisa, Beller, Sieghard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162519
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00486
_version_ 1782249895335297024
author Bender, Andrea
Rothe-Wulf, Annelie
Hüther, Lisa
Beller, Sieghard
author_facet Bender, Andrea
Rothe-Wulf, Annelie
Hüther, Lisa
Beller, Sieghard
author_sort Bender, Andrea
collection PubMed
description People often use spatial vocabulary to describe temporal relations, and this increasingly has motivated attempts to map spatial frames of reference (FoRs) onto time. Recent research suggested that speech communities, which differ in how they conceptualize space, may also differ in how they conceptualize time and, more specifically, that the preferences for spatial FoRs should carry over to the domain of time. Here, we scrutinize this assumption (a) by reviewing data from recent studies on temporal references, (b) by comparing data we had collected in previous studies on preferences for spatial and temporal FoRs in four languages, (c) by analyzing new data from dynamic spatial tasks that resemble the temporal tasks more closely, and (d) by assessing the co-variation of individual preferences of English speakers across space and time. While the first set of data paints a mixed picture, the latter three do not support the assumption of a close link between referencing preferences across domains. We explore possible reasons for this lack of consistency and discuss implications for research on temporal references.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3498962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34989622012-11-16 Moving Forward in Space and Time: How Strong is the Conceptual Link between Spatial and Temporal Frames of Reference? Bender, Andrea Rothe-Wulf, Annelie Hüther, Lisa Beller, Sieghard Front Psychol Psychology People often use spatial vocabulary to describe temporal relations, and this increasingly has motivated attempts to map spatial frames of reference (FoRs) onto time. Recent research suggested that speech communities, which differ in how they conceptualize space, may also differ in how they conceptualize time and, more specifically, that the preferences for spatial FoRs should carry over to the domain of time. Here, we scrutinize this assumption (a) by reviewing data from recent studies on temporal references, (b) by comparing data we had collected in previous studies on preferences for spatial and temporal FoRs in four languages, (c) by analyzing new data from dynamic spatial tasks that resemble the temporal tasks more closely, and (d) by assessing the co-variation of individual preferences of English speakers across space and time. While the first set of data paints a mixed picture, the latter three do not support the assumption of a close link between referencing preferences across domains. We explore possible reasons for this lack of consistency and discuss implications for research on temporal references. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3498962/ /pubmed/23162519 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00486 Text en Copyright © 2012 Bender, Rothe-Wulf, Hüther and Beller. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychology
Bender, Andrea
Rothe-Wulf, Annelie
Hüther, Lisa
Beller, Sieghard
Moving Forward in Space and Time: How Strong is the Conceptual Link between Spatial and Temporal Frames of Reference?
title Moving Forward in Space and Time: How Strong is the Conceptual Link between Spatial and Temporal Frames of Reference?
title_full Moving Forward in Space and Time: How Strong is the Conceptual Link between Spatial and Temporal Frames of Reference?
title_fullStr Moving Forward in Space and Time: How Strong is the Conceptual Link between Spatial and Temporal Frames of Reference?
title_full_unstemmed Moving Forward in Space and Time: How Strong is the Conceptual Link between Spatial and Temporal Frames of Reference?
title_short Moving Forward in Space and Time: How Strong is the Conceptual Link between Spatial and Temporal Frames of Reference?
title_sort moving forward in space and time: how strong is the conceptual link between spatial and temporal frames of reference?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23162519
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00486
work_keys_str_mv AT benderandrea movingforwardinspaceandtimehowstrongistheconceptuallinkbetweenspatialandtemporalframesofreference
AT rothewulfannelie movingforwardinspaceandtimehowstrongistheconceptuallinkbetweenspatialandtemporalframesofreference
AT hutherlisa movingforwardinspaceandtimehowstrongistheconceptuallinkbetweenspatialandtemporalframesofreference
AT bellersieghard movingforwardinspaceandtimehowstrongistheconceptuallinkbetweenspatialandtemporalframesofreference