Cargando…

Comparison of Haemophilus parasuis reference strains and field isolates by using random amplified polymorphic DNA and protein profiles

BACKGROUND: Haemophilus parasuis is the causative agent of Glässer’s disease and is a pathogen of swine in high-health status herds. Reports on serotyping of field strains from outbreaks describe that approximately 30% of them are nontypeable and therefore cannot be traced. Molecular typing methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zehr, Emilie S, Lavrov, Dennis V, Tabatabai, Louisa B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3499290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22703293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-108
_version_ 1782249937605492736
author Zehr, Emilie S
Lavrov, Dennis V
Tabatabai, Louisa B
author_facet Zehr, Emilie S
Lavrov, Dennis V
Tabatabai, Louisa B
author_sort Zehr, Emilie S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Haemophilus parasuis is the causative agent of Glässer’s disease and is a pathogen of swine in high-health status herds. Reports on serotyping of field strains from outbreaks describe that approximately 30% of them are nontypeable and therefore cannot be traced. Molecular typing methods have been used as alternatives to serotyping. This study was done to compare random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) profiles and whole cell protein (WCP) lysate profiles as methods for distinguishing H. parasuis reference strains and field isolates. RESULTS: The DNA and WCP lysate profiles of 15 reference strains and 31 field isolates of H. parasuis were analyzed using the Dice and neighbor joining algorithms. The results revealed unique and reproducible DNA and protein profiles among the reference strains and field isolates studied. Simpson’s index of diversity showed significant discrimination between isolates when three 10mer primers were combined for the RAPD method and also when both the RAPD and WCP lysate typing methods were combined. CONCLUSIONS: The RAPD profiles seen among the reference strains and field isolates did not appear to change over time which may reflect a lack of DNA mutations in the genes of the samples. The recent field isolates had different WCP lysate profiles than the reference strains, possibly because the number of passages of the type strains may affect their protein expression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3499290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34992902012-11-16 Comparison of Haemophilus parasuis reference strains and field isolates by using random amplified polymorphic DNA and protein profiles Zehr, Emilie S Lavrov, Dennis V Tabatabai, Louisa B BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Haemophilus parasuis is the causative agent of Glässer’s disease and is a pathogen of swine in high-health status herds. Reports on serotyping of field strains from outbreaks describe that approximately 30% of them are nontypeable and therefore cannot be traced. Molecular typing methods have been used as alternatives to serotyping. This study was done to compare random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) profiles and whole cell protein (WCP) lysate profiles as methods for distinguishing H. parasuis reference strains and field isolates. RESULTS: The DNA and WCP lysate profiles of 15 reference strains and 31 field isolates of H. parasuis were analyzed using the Dice and neighbor joining algorithms. The results revealed unique and reproducible DNA and protein profiles among the reference strains and field isolates studied. Simpson’s index of diversity showed significant discrimination between isolates when three 10mer primers were combined for the RAPD method and also when both the RAPD and WCP lysate typing methods were combined. CONCLUSIONS: The RAPD profiles seen among the reference strains and field isolates did not appear to change over time which may reflect a lack of DNA mutations in the genes of the samples. The recent field isolates had different WCP lysate profiles than the reference strains, possibly because the number of passages of the type strains may affect their protein expression. BioMed Central 2012-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3499290/ /pubmed/22703293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-108 Text en Copyright ©2012 Zehr et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zehr, Emilie S
Lavrov, Dennis V
Tabatabai, Louisa B
Comparison of Haemophilus parasuis reference strains and field isolates by using random amplified polymorphic DNA and protein profiles
title Comparison of Haemophilus parasuis reference strains and field isolates by using random amplified polymorphic DNA and protein profiles
title_full Comparison of Haemophilus parasuis reference strains and field isolates by using random amplified polymorphic DNA and protein profiles
title_fullStr Comparison of Haemophilus parasuis reference strains and field isolates by using random amplified polymorphic DNA and protein profiles
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Haemophilus parasuis reference strains and field isolates by using random amplified polymorphic DNA and protein profiles
title_short Comparison of Haemophilus parasuis reference strains and field isolates by using random amplified polymorphic DNA and protein profiles
title_sort comparison of haemophilus parasuis reference strains and field isolates by using random amplified polymorphic dna and protein profiles
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3499290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22703293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-108
work_keys_str_mv AT zehremilies comparisonofhaemophilusparasuisreferencestrainsandfieldisolatesbyusingrandomamplifiedpolymorphicdnaandproteinprofiles
AT lavrovdennisv comparisonofhaemophilusparasuisreferencestrainsandfieldisolatesbyusingrandomamplifiedpolymorphicdnaandproteinprofiles
AT tabatabailouisab comparisonofhaemophilusparasuisreferencestrainsandfieldisolatesbyusingrandomamplifiedpolymorphicdnaandproteinprofiles