Cargando…

Your Space or Mine? Mapping Self in Time

While humans are capable of mentally transcending the here and now, this faculty for mental time travel (MTT) is dependent upon an underlying cognitive representation of time. To this end, linguistic, cognitive and behavioral evidence has revealed that people understand abstract temporal constructs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christian, Brittany M., Miles, Lynden K., Macrae, C. Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3499549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23166617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049228
_version_ 1782249988270587904
author Christian, Brittany M.
Miles, Lynden K.
Macrae, C. Neil
author_facet Christian, Brittany M.
Miles, Lynden K.
Macrae, C. Neil
author_sort Christian, Brittany M.
collection PubMed
description While humans are capable of mentally transcending the here and now, this faculty for mental time travel (MTT) is dependent upon an underlying cognitive representation of time. To this end, linguistic, cognitive and behavioral evidence has revealed that people understand abstract temporal constructs by mapping them to concrete spatial domains (e.g. past = backward, future = forward). However, very little research has investigated factors that may determine the topographical characteristics of these spatiotemporal maps. Guided by the imperative role of episodic content for retrospective and prospective thought (i.e., MTT), here we explored the possibility that the spatialization of time is influenced by the amount of episodic detail a temporal unit contains. In two experiments, participants mapped temporal events along mediolateral (Experiment 1) and anterioposterior (Experiment 2) spatial planes. Importantly, the temporal units varied in self-relevance as they pertained to temporally proximal or distal events in the participant’s own life, the life of a best friend or the life of an unfamiliar other. Converging evidence from both experiments revealed that the amount of space used to represent time varied as a function of target (self, best friend or unfamiliar other) and temporal distance. Specifically, self-time was represented as occupying more space than time pertaining to other targets, but only for temporally proximal events. These results demonstrate the malleability of space-time mapping and suggest that there is a self-specific conceptualization of time that may influence MTT as well as other temporally relevant cognitive phenomena.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3499549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34995492012-11-19 Your Space or Mine? Mapping Self in Time Christian, Brittany M. Miles, Lynden K. Macrae, C. Neil PLoS One Research Article While humans are capable of mentally transcending the here and now, this faculty for mental time travel (MTT) is dependent upon an underlying cognitive representation of time. To this end, linguistic, cognitive and behavioral evidence has revealed that people understand abstract temporal constructs by mapping them to concrete spatial domains (e.g. past = backward, future = forward). However, very little research has investigated factors that may determine the topographical characteristics of these spatiotemporal maps. Guided by the imperative role of episodic content for retrospective and prospective thought (i.e., MTT), here we explored the possibility that the spatialization of time is influenced by the amount of episodic detail a temporal unit contains. In two experiments, participants mapped temporal events along mediolateral (Experiment 1) and anterioposterior (Experiment 2) spatial planes. Importantly, the temporal units varied in self-relevance as they pertained to temporally proximal or distal events in the participant’s own life, the life of a best friend or the life of an unfamiliar other. Converging evidence from both experiments revealed that the amount of space used to represent time varied as a function of target (self, best friend or unfamiliar other) and temporal distance. Specifically, self-time was represented as occupying more space than time pertaining to other targets, but only for temporally proximal events. These results demonstrate the malleability of space-time mapping and suggest that there is a self-specific conceptualization of time that may influence MTT as well as other temporally relevant cognitive phenomena. Public Library of Science 2012-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3499549/ /pubmed/23166617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049228 Text en © 2012 Christian et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Christian, Brittany M.
Miles, Lynden K.
Macrae, C. Neil
Your Space or Mine? Mapping Self in Time
title Your Space or Mine? Mapping Self in Time
title_full Your Space or Mine? Mapping Self in Time
title_fullStr Your Space or Mine? Mapping Self in Time
title_full_unstemmed Your Space or Mine? Mapping Self in Time
title_short Your Space or Mine? Mapping Self in Time
title_sort your space or mine? mapping self in time
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3499549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23166617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049228
work_keys_str_mv AT christianbrittanym yourspaceorminemappingselfintime
AT mileslyndenk yourspaceorminemappingselfintime
AT macraecneil yourspaceorminemappingselfintime