Cargando…

Overestimation of the probability of death on peritoneal dialysis by the Kaplan-Meier method: advantages of a competing risks approach

BACKGROUND: In survival analysis, patients on peritoneal dialysis are confronted with three different outcomes: transfer to hemodialysis, renal transplantation, or death. The Kaplan-Meier method takes into account one event only, so whether it adequately considers these different risks is questionab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste, Pagniez, Dominique, Boulanger, Eric, Lessore de Sainte Foy, Celia, Salleron, Julia, Frimat, Luc, Duhamel, Alain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3500245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22646159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-13-31
_version_ 1782250083915399168
author Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste
Pagniez, Dominique
Boulanger, Eric
Lessore de Sainte Foy, Celia
Salleron, Julia
Frimat, Luc
Duhamel, Alain
author_facet Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste
Pagniez, Dominique
Boulanger, Eric
Lessore de Sainte Foy, Celia
Salleron, Julia
Frimat, Luc
Duhamel, Alain
author_sort Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In survival analysis, patients on peritoneal dialysis are confronted with three different outcomes: transfer to hemodialysis, renal transplantation, or death. The Kaplan-Meier method takes into account one event only, so whether it adequately considers these different risks is questionable. The more recent competing risks method has been shown to be more appropriate in analyzing such situations. METHODS: We compared the estimations obtained by the Kaplan-Meier method and the competing risks method (namely the Kalbfleisch and Prentice approach), in 383 consecutive incident peritoneal dialysis patients. By means of simulations, we then compared the Kaplan-Meier estimations obtained in two virtual centers where patients had exactly the same probability of death. The only difference between these two virtual centers was whether renal transplantation was available or not. RESULTS: At five years, 107 (27.9%) patients had died, 109 (28.4%) had been transferred to hemodialysis, 91 (23.8%) had been transplanted, and 37 (9.7%) were still alive on peritoneal dialysis; before five years, 39 (10.2%) patients were censored alive on peritoneal dialysis. The five-year probabilities estimated by the Kaplan-Meier and the competing risks methods were respectively: death: 50% versus 30%; transfer to hemodialysis: 59% versus 32%; renal transplantation: 39% versus 26%; event-free survival: 12% versus 12%. The sum of the Kaplan-Meier estimations exceeded 100%, implying that patients could experience more than one event, death and transplantation for example, which is impossible. In the simulations, the probability of death estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method increased as the probability of renal transplantation increased, although the probability of death actually remained constant. CONCLUSION: The competing risks method appears more appropriate than the Kaplan-Meier method for estimating the probability of events in peritoneal dialysis in the context of univariable survival analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3500245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35002452012-11-17 Overestimation of the probability of death on peritoneal dialysis by the Kaplan-Meier method: advantages of a competing risks approach Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste Pagniez, Dominique Boulanger, Eric Lessore de Sainte Foy, Celia Salleron, Julia Frimat, Luc Duhamel, Alain BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: In survival analysis, patients on peritoneal dialysis are confronted with three different outcomes: transfer to hemodialysis, renal transplantation, or death. The Kaplan-Meier method takes into account one event only, so whether it adequately considers these different risks is questionable. The more recent competing risks method has been shown to be more appropriate in analyzing such situations. METHODS: We compared the estimations obtained by the Kaplan-Meier method and the competing risks method (namely the Kalbfleisch and Prentice approach), in 383 consecutive incident peritoneal dialysis patients. By means of simulations, we then compared the Kaplan-Meier estimations obtained in two virtual centers where patients had exactly the same probability of death. The only difference between these two virtual centers was whether renal transplantation was available or not. RESULTS: At five years, 107 (27.9%) patients had died, 109 (28.4%) had been transferred to hemodialysis, 91 (23.8%) had been transplanted, and 37 (9.7%) were still alive on peritoneal dialysis; before five years, 39 (10.2%) patients were censored alive on peritoneal dialysis. The five-year probabilities estimated by the Kaplan-Meier and the competing risks methods were respectively: death: 50% versus 30%; transfer to hemodialysis: 59% versus 32%; renal transplantation: 39% versus 26%; event-free survival: 12% versus 12%. The sum of the Kaplan-Meier estimations exceeded 100%, implying that patients could experience more than one event, death and transplantation for example, which is impossible. In the simulations, the probability of death estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method increased as the probability of renal transplantation increased, although the probability of death actually remained constant. CONCLUSION: The competing risks method appears more appropriate than the Kaplan-Meier method for estimating the probability of events in peritoneal dialysis in the context of univariable survival analysis. BioMed Central 2012-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3500245/ /pubmed/22646159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-13-31 Text en Copyright ©2012 Beuscart et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste
Pagniez, Dominique
Boulanger, Eric
Lessore de Sainte Foy, Celia
Salleron, Julia
Frimat, Luc
Duhamel, Alain
Overestimation of the probability of death on peritoneal dialysis by the Kaplan-Meier method: advantages of a competing risks approach
title Overestimation of the probability of death on peritoneal dialysis by the Kaplan-Meier method: advantages of a competing risks approach
title_full Overestimation of the probability of death on peritoneal dialysis by the Kaplan-Meier method: advantages of a competing risks approach
title_fullStr Overestimation of the probability of death on peritoneal dialysis by the Kaplan-Meier method: advantages of a competing risks approach
title_full_unstemmed Overestimation of the probability of death on peritoneal dialysis by the Kaplan-Meier method: advantages of a competing risks approach
title_short Overestimation of the probability of death on peritoneal dialysis by the Kaplan-Meier method: advantages of a competing risks approach
title_sort overestimation of the probability of death on peritoneal dialysis by the kaplan-meier method: advantages of a competing risks approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3500245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22646159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-13-31
work_keys_str_mv AT beuscartjeanbaptiste overestimationoftheprobabilityofdeathonperitonealdialysisbythekaplanmeiermethodadvantagesofacompetingrisksapproach
AT pagniezdominique overestimationoftheprobabilityofdeathonperitonealdialysisbythekaplanmeiermethodadvantagesofacompetingrisksapproach
AT boulangereric overestimationoftheprobabilityofdeathonperitonealdialysisbythekaplanmeiermethodadvantagesofacompetingrisksapproach
AT lessoredesaintefoycelia overestimationoftheprobabilityofdeathonperitonealdialysisbythekaplanmeiermethodadvantagesofacompetingrisksapproach
AT salleronjulia overestimationoftheprobabilityofdeathonperitonealdialysisbythekaplanmeiermethodadvantagesofacompetingrisksapproach
AT frimatluc overestimationoftheprobabilityofdeathonperitonealdialysisbythekaplanmeiermethodadvantagesofacompetingrisksapproach
AT duhamelalain overestimationoftheprobabilityofdeathonperitonealdialysisbythekaplanmeiermethodadvantagesofacompetingrisksapproach