Cargando…

Validation of Orthopedic Postoperative Pain Assessment Methods for Dogs: A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

In the context of translational research, there is growing interest in studying surgical orthopedic pain management approaches that are common to humans and dogs. The validity of postoperative pain assessment methods is uncertain with regards to responsiveness and the potential interference of analg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rialland, Pascale, Authier, Simon, Guillot, Martin, del Castillo, Jérôme R. E., Veilleux-Lemieux, Daphnée, Frank, Diane, Gauvin, Dominique, Troncy, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3500314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23166681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049480
_version_ 1782250099624116224
author Rialland, Pascale
Authier, Simon
Guillot, Martin
del Castillo, Jérôme R. E.
Veilleux-Lemieux, Daphnée
Frank, Diane
Gauvin, Dominique
Troncy, Eric
author_facet Rialland, Pascale
Authier, Simon
Guillot, Martin
del Castillo, Jérôme R. E.
Veilleux-Lemieux, Daphnée
Frank, Diane
Gauvin, Dominique
Troncy, Eric
author_sort Rialland, Pascale
collection PubMed
description In the context of translational research, there is growing interest in studying surgical orthopedic pain management approaches that are common to humans and dogs. The validity of postoperative pain assessment methods is uncertain with regards to responsiveness and the potential interference of analgesia. The hypothesis was that video analysis (as a reference), electrodermal activity, and two subjective pain scales (VAS and 4A-VET) would detect different levels of pain intensity in dogs after a standardized trochleoplasty procedure. In this prospective, blinded, randomized study, postoperative pain was assessed in 25 healthy dogs during a 48-hour time frame (T). Pain was managed with placebo (Group 1, n = 10), preemptive and multimodal analgesia (Group 2, n = 5), or preemptive analgesia consisting in oral tramadol (Group 3, n = 10). Changes over time among groups were analyzed using generalized estimating equations. Multivariate regression tested the significance of relationships between pain scales and video analysis. Video analysis identified that one orthopedic behavior, namely ‘Walking with full weight bearing’ of the operated leg, decreased more in Group 1 at T24 (indicative of pain), whereas three behaviors indicative of sedation decreased in Group 2 at T24 (all p<0.004). Electrodermal activity was higher in Group 1 than in Groups 2 and 3 until T1 (p<0.0003). The VAS was not responsive. 4A-VET showed divergent results as its orthopedic component (4A-VETleg) detected lower pain in Group 2 until T12 (p<0.0009), but its interactive component (4A-VETbeh) was increased in Group 2 from T12 to T48 (p<0.001). Concurrent validity established that 4A-VETleg scores the painful orthopedic condition accurately and that pain assessment through 4A-VETbeh and VAS was severely biased by the sedative side-effect of the analgesics. Finally, the video analysis offered a concise template for assessment in dogs with acute orthopedic pain. However, subjective pain quantification methods and electrodermal activity need further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3500314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35003142012-11-19 Validation of Orthopedic Postoperative Pain Assessment Methods for Dogs: A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study Rialland, Pascale Authier, Simon Guillot, Martin del Castillo, Jérôme R. E. Veilleux-Lemieux, Daphnée Frank, Diane Gauvin, Dominique Troncy, Eric PLoS One Research Article In the context of translational research, there is growing interest in studying surgical orthopedic pain management approaches that are common to humans and dogs. The validity of postoperative pain assessment methods is uncertain with regards to responsiveness and the potential interference of analgesia. The hypothesis was that video analysis (as a reference), electrodermal activity, and two subjective pain scales (VAS and 4A-VET) would detect different levels of pain intensity in dogs after a standardized trochleoplasty procedure. In this prospective, blinded, randomized study, postoperative pain was assessed in 25 healthy dogs during a 48-hour time frame (T). Pain was managed with placebo (Group 1, n = 10), preemptive and multimodal analgesia (Group 2, n = 5), or preemptive analgesia consisting in oral tramadol (Group 3, n = 10). Changes over time among groups were analyzed using generalized estimating equations. Multivariate regression tested the significance of relationships between pain scales and video analysis. Video analysis identified that one orthopedic behavior, namely ‘Walking with full weight bearing’ of the operated leg, decreased more in Group 1 at T24 (indicative of pain), whereas three behaviors indicative of sedation decreased in Group 2 at T24 (all p<0.004). Electrodermal activity was higher in Group 1 than in Groups 2 and 3 until T1 (p<0.0003). The VAS was not responsive. 4A-VET showed divergent results as its orthopedic component (4A-VETleg) detected lower pain in Group 2 until T12 (p<0.0009), but its interactive component (4A-VETbeh) was increased in Group 2 from T12 to T48 (p<0.001). Concurrent validity established that 4A-VETleg scores the painful orthopedic condition accurately and that pain assessment through 4A-VETbeh and VAS was severely biased by the sedative side-effect of the analgesics. Finally, the video analysis offered a concise template for assessment in dogs with acute orthopedic pain. However, subjective pain quantification methods and electrodermal activity need further investigation. Public Library of Science 2012-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3500314/ /pubmed/23166681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049480 Text en © 2012 Rialland et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rialland, Pascale
Authier, Simon
Guillot, Martin
del Castillo, Jérôme R. E.
Veilleux-Lemieux, Daphnée
Frank, Diane
Gauvin, Dominique
Troncy, Eric
Validation of Orthopedic Postoperative Pain Assessment Methods for Dogs: A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study
title Validation of Orthopedic Postoperative Pain Assessment Methods for Dogs: A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study
title_full Validation of Orthopedic Postoperative Pain Assessment Methods for Dogs: A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study
title_fullStr Validation of Orthopedic Postoperative Pain Assessment Methods for Dogs: A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Orthopedic Postoperative Pain Assessment Methods for Dogs: A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study
title_short Validation of Orthopedic Postoperative Pain Assessment Methods for Dogs: A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study
title_sort validation of orthopedic postoperative pain assessment methods for dogs: a prospective, blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3500314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23166681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049480
work_keys_str_mv AT riallandpascale validationoforthopedicpostoperativepainassessmentmethodsfordogsaprospectiveblindedrandomizedplacebocontrolledstudy
AT authiersimon validationoforthopedicpostoperativepainassessmentmethodsfordogsaprospectiveblindedrandomizedplacebocontrolledstudy
AT guillotmartin validationoforthopedicpostoperativepainassessmentmethodsfordogsaprospectiveblindedrandomizedplacebocontrolledstudy
AT delcastillojeromere validationoforthopedicpostoperativepainassessmentmethodsfordogsaprospectiveblindedrandomizedplacebocontrolledstudy
AT veilleuxlemieuxdaphnee validationoforthopedicpostoperativepainassessmentmethodsfordogsaprospectiveblindedrandomizedplacebocontrolledstudy
AT frankdiane validationoforthopedicpostoperativepainassessmentmethodsfordogsaprospectiveblindedrandomizedplacebocontrolledstudy
AT gauvindominique validationoforthopedicpostoperativepainassessmentmethodsfordogsaprospectiveblindedrandomizedplacebocontrolledstudy
AT troncyeric validationoforthopedicpostoperativepainassessmentmethodsfordogsaprospectiveblindedrandomizedplacebocontrolledstudy