Cargando…
The effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory
Previous studies have shown that self-generated information is better remembered than information that has been read passively. To further examine this subsequent memory effect, we investigated the effect of five different linguistic relationships on memory encoding. Ninety subjects were administere...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Inc
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3500465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23170241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.98 |
_version_ | 1782250112980877312 |
---|---|
author | Siegel, Miriam Allendorfer, Jane B Lindsell, Christopher J Vannest, Jennifer Szaflarski, Jerzy P |
author_facet | Siegel, Miriam Allendorfer, Jane B Lindsell, Christopher J Vannest, Jennifer Szaflarski, Jerzy P |
author_sort | Siegel, Miriam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous studies have shown that self-generated information is better remembered than information that has been read passively. To further examine this subsequent memory effect, we investigated the effect of five different linguistic relationships on memory encoding. Ninety subjects were administered 60 paired associates during an encoding condition: 30 of the second words from each pair were to be read aloud and 30 were to be self-generated from clues as to the correct word. Word pairs were composed of five linguistic relationships: category, rhyme, opposite, synonym, and association. Subsequently, subjects were presented with the words that were read or generated in a forced recognition memory task. Overall, reading accuracy was higher than generation accuracy during the encoding phase (all P < 0.001). During the recognition phase, subjects' performance was better on the generate than on the read conditions for opposite, synonym, category, and association relationships (all P < 0.05), with no difference in the rhyme relationship. These results confirm previous findings that self-generated information is better remembered than read information and suggest that this advantage may be mediated by using opposite, synonym, category, and association relationships, while rhyme relationship may not extend such an advantage. These findings may have implications for future studies of memory interventions in healthy controls and subjects with cognitive impairments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3500465 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35004652012-11-20 The effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory Siegel, Miriam Allendorfer, Jane B Lindsell, Christopher J Vannest, Jennifer Szaflarski, Jerzy P Brain Behav Original Research Previous studies have shown that self-generated information is better remembered than information that has been read passively. To further examine this subsequent memory effect, we investigated the effect of five different linguistic relationships on memory encoding. Ninety subjects were administered 60 paired associates during an encoding condition: 30 of the second words from each pair were to be read aloud and 30 were to be self-generated from clues as to the correct word. Word pairs were composed of five linguistic relationships: category, rhyme, opposite, synonym, and association. Subsequently, subjects were presented with the words that were read or generated in a forced recognition memory task. Overall, reading accuracy was higher than generation accuracy during the encoding phase (all P < 0.001). During the recognition phase, subjects' performance was better on the generate than on the read conditions for opposite, synonym, category, and association relationships (all P < 0.05), with no difference in the rhyme relationship. These results confirm previous findings that self-generated information is better remembered than read information and suggest that this advantage may be mediated by using opposite, synonym, category, and association relationships, while rhyme relationship may not extend such an advantage. These findings may have implications for future studies of memory interventions in healthy controls and subjects with cognitive impairments. Blackwell Publishing Inc 2012-11 2012-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3500465/ /pubmed/23170241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.98 Text en © 2012 Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Siegel, Miriam Allendorfer, Jane B Lindsell, Christopher J Vannest, Jennifer Szaflarski, Jerzy P The effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory |
title | The effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory |
title_full | The effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory |
title_fullStr | The effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory |
title_short | The effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory |
title_sort | effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3500465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23170241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.98 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siegelmiriam theeffectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory AT allendorferjaneb theeffectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory AT lindsellchristopherj theeffectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory AT vannestjennifer theeffectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory AT szaflarskijerzyp theeffectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory AT siegelmiriam effectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory AT allendorferjaneb effectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory AT lindsellchristopherj effectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory AT vannestjennifer effectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory AT szaflarskijerzyp effectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory |