Cargando…

The effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory

Previous studies have shown that self-generated information is better remembered than information that has been read passively. To further examine this subsequent memory effect, we investigated the effect of five different linguistic relationships on memory encoding. Ninety subjects were administere...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siegel, Miriam, Allendorfer, Jane B, Lindsell, Christopher J, Vannest, Jennifer, Szaflarski, Jerzy P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Inc 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3500465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23170241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.98
_version_ 1782250112980877312
author Siegel, Miriam
Allendorfer, Jane B
Lindsell, Christopher J
Vannest, Jennifer
Szaflarski, Jerzy P
author_facet Siegel, Miriam
Allendorfer, Jane B
Lindsell, Christopher J
Vannest, Jennifer
Szaflarski, Jerzy P
author_sort Siegel, Miriam
collection PubMed
description Previous studies have shown that self-generated information is better remembered than information that has been read passively. To further examine this subsequent memory effect, we investigated the effect of five different linguistic relationships on memory encoding. Ninety subjects were administered 60 paired associates during an encoding condition: 30 of the second words from each pair were to be read aloud and 30 were to be self-generated from clues as to the correct word. Word pairs were composed of five linguistic relationships: category, rhyme, opposite, synonym, and association. Subsequently, subjects were presented with the words that were read or generated in a forced recognition memory task. Overall, reading accuracy was higher than generation accuracy during the encoding phase (all P < 0.001). During the recognition phase, subjects' performance was better on the generate than on the read conditions for opposite, synonym, category, and association relationships (all P < 0.05), with no difference in the rhyme relationship. These results confirm previous findings that self-generated information is better remembered than read information and suggest that this advantage may be mediated by using opposite, synonym, category, and association relationships, while rhyme relationship may not extend such an advantage. These findings may have implications for future studies of memory interventions in healthy controls and subjects with cognitive impairments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3500465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Blackwell Publishing Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35004652012-11-20 The effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory Siegel, Miriam Allendorfer, Jane B Lindsell, Christopher J Vannest, Jennifer Szaflarski, Jerzy P Brain Behav Original Research Previous studies have shown that self-generated information is better remembered than information that has been read passively. To further examine this subsequent memory effect, we investigated the effect of five different linguistic relationships on memory encoding. Ninety subjects were administered 60 paired associates during an encoding condition: 30 of the second words from each pair were to be read aloud and 30 were to be self-generated from clues as to the correct word. Word pairs were composed of five linguistic relationships: category, rhyme, opposite, synonym, and association. Subsequently, subjects were presented with the words that were read or generated in a forced recognition memory task. Overall, reading accuracy was higher than generation accuracy during the encoding phase (all P < 0.001). During the recognition phase, subjects' performance was better on the generate than on the read conditions for opposite, synonym, category, and association relationships (all P < 0.05), with no difference in the rhyme relationship. These results confirm previous findings that self-generated information is better remembered than read information and suggest that this advantage may be mediated by using opposite, synonym, category, and association relationships, while rhyme relationship may not extend such an advantage. These findings may have implications for future studies of memory interventions in healthy controls and subjects with cognitive impairments. Blackwell Publishing Inc 2012-11 2012-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3500465/ /pubmed/23170241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.98 Text en © 2012 Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Research
Siegel, Miriam
Allendorfer, Jane B
Lindsell, Christopher J
Vannest, Jennifer
Szaflarski, Jerzy P
The effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory
title The effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory
title_full The effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory
title_fullStr The effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory
title_full_unstemmed The effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory
title_short The effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory
title_sort effects of linguistic relationships among paired associates on verbal self-generation and recognition memory
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3500465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23170241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.98
work_keys_str_mv AT siegelmiriam theeffectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory
AT allendorferjaneb theeffectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory
AT lindsellchristopherj theeffectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory
AT vannestjennifer theeffectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory
AT szaflarskijerzyp theeffectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory
AT siegelmiriam effectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory
AT allendorferjaneb effectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory
AT lindsellchristopherj effectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory
AT vannestjennifer effectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory
AT szaflarskijerzyp effectsoflinguisticrelationshipsamongpairedassociatesonverbalselfgenerationandrecognitionmemory