Cargando…

How Many People Could Use an SSVEP BCI?

Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are communication systems that allow people to send messages or commands without movement. BCIs rely on different types of signals in the electroencephalogram (EEG), typically P300s, steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP), or event-related desynchronization....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guger, Christoph, Allison, Brendan Z., Großwindhager, Bernhard, Prückl, Robert, Hintermüller, Christoph, Kapeller, Christoph, Bruckner, Markus, Krausz, Gunther, Edlinger, Günter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3500831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23181009
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00169
_version_ 1782250146064498688
author Guger, Christoph
Allison, Brendan Z.
Großwindhager, Bernhard
Prückl, Robert
Hintermüller, Christoph
Kapeller, Christoph
Bruckner, Markus
Krausz, Gunther
Edlinger, Günter
author_facet Guger, Christoph
Allison, Brendan Z.
Großwindhager, Bernhard
Prückl, Robert
Hintermüller, Christoph
Kapeller, Christoph
Bruckner, Markus
Krausz, Gunther
Edlinger, Günter
author_sort Guger, Christoph
collection PubMed
description Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are communication systems that allow people to send messages or commands without movement. BCIs rely on different types of signals in the electroencephalogram (EEG), typically P300s, steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP), or event-related desynchronization. Early BCI systems were often evaluated with a selected group of subjects. Also, many articles do not mention data from subjects who performed poorly. These and other factors have made it difficult to estimate how many people could use different BCIs. The present study explored how many subjects could use an SSVEP BCI. We recorded data from 53 subjects while they participated in 1–4 runs that were each 4 min long. During these runs, the subjects focused on one of four LEDs that each flickered at a different frequency. The eight channel EEG data were analyzed with a minimum energy parameter estimation algorithm and classified with linear discriminant analysis into one of the four classes. Online results showed that SSVEP BCIs could provide effective communication for all 53 subjects, resulting in a grand average accuracy of 95.5%. About 96.2% of the subjects reached an accuracy above 80%, and nobody was below 60%. This study showed that SSVEP based BCI systems can reach very high accuracies after only a very short training period. The SSVEP approach worked for all participating subjects, who attained accuracy well above chance level. This is important because it shows that SSVEP BCIs could provide communication for some users when other approaches might not work for them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3500831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35008312012-11-23 How Many People Could Use an SSVEP BCI? Guger, Christoph Allison, Brendan Z. Großwindhager, Bernhard Prückl, Robert Hintermüller, Christoph Kapeller, Christoph Bruckner, Markus Krausz, Gunther Edlinger, Günter Front Neurosci Neuroscience Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are communication systems that allow people to send messages or commands without movement. BCIs rely on different types of signals in the electroencephalogram (EEG), typically P300s, steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP), or event-related desynchronization. Early BCI systems were often evaluated with a selected group of subjects. Also, many articles do not mention data from subjects who performed poorly. These and other factors have made it difficult to estimate how many people could use different BCIs. The present study explored how many subjects could use an SSVEP BCI. We recorded data from 53 subjects while they participated in 1–4 runs that were each 4 min long. During these runs, the subjects focused on one of four LEDs that each flickered at a different frequency. The eight channel EEG data were analyzed with a minimum energy parameter estimation algorithm and classified with linear discriminant analysis into one of the four classes. Online results showed that SSVEP BCIs could provide effective communication for all 53 subjects, resulting in a grand average accuracy of 95.5%. About 96.2% of the subjects reached an accuracy above 80%, and nobody was below 60%. This study showed that SSVEP based BCI systems can reach very high accuracies after only a very short training period. The SSVEP approach worked for all participating subjects, who attained accuracy well above chance level. This is important because it shows that SSVEP BCIs could provide communication for some users when other approaches might not work for them. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3500831/ /pubmed/23181009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00169 Text en Copyright © 2012 Guger, Allison, Großwindhager, Prückl, Hintermüller, Kapeller, Bruckner, Krausz and Edlinger. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Guger, Christoph
Allison, Brendan Z.
Großwindhager, Bernhard
Prückl, Robert
Hintermüller, Christoph
Kapeller, Christoph
Bruckner, Markus
Krausz, Gunther
Edlinger, Günter
How Many People Could Use an SSVEP BCI?
title How Many People Could Use an SSVEP BCI?
title_full How Many People Could Use an SSVEP BCI?
title_fullStr How Many People Could Use an SSVEP BCI?
title_full_unstemmed How Many People Could Use an SSVEP BCI?
title_short How Many People Could Use an SSVEP BCI?
title_sort how many people could use an ssvep bci?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3500831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23181009
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00169
work_keys_str_mv AT gugerchristoph howmanypeoplecoulduseanssvepbci
AT allisonbrendanz howmanypeoplecoulduseanssvepbci
AT großwindhagerbernhard howmanypeoplecoulduseanssvepbci
AT prucklrobert howmanypeoplecoulduseanssvepbci
AT hintermullerchristoph howmanypeoplecoulduseanssvepbci
AT kapellerchristoph howmanypeoplecoulduseanssvepbci
AT brucknermarkus howmanypeoplecoulduseanssvepbci
AT krauszgunther howmanypeoplecoulduseanssvepbci
AT edlingergunter howmanypeoplecoulduseanssvepbci