Cargando…

How Accurate Are the Fusion of Cone-Beam CT and 3-D Stereophotographic Images?

BACKGROUND: Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and stereophotography are two of the latest imaging modalities available for three-dimensional (3-D) visualization of craniofacial structures. However, CBCT provides only limited information on surface texture. This can be overcome by combining the bo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayaratne, Yasas S. N., McGrath, Colman P. J., Zwahlen, Roger A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3501455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049585
_version_ 1782250190426603520
author Jayaratne, Yasas S. N.
McGrath, Colman P. J.
Zwahlen, Roger A.
author_facet Jayaratne, Yasas S. N.
McGrath, Colman P. J.
Zwahlen, Roger A.
author_sort Jayaratne, Yasas S. N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and stereophotography are two of the latest imaging modalities available for three-dimensional (3-D) visualization of craniofacial structures. However, CBCT provides only limited information on surface texture. This can be overcome by combining the bone images derived from CBCT with 3-D photographs. The objectives of this study were 1) to evaluate the feasibility of integrating 3-D Photos and CBCT images 2) to assess degree of error that may occur during the above processes and 3) to identify facial regions that would be most appropriate for 3-D image registration. METHODOLOGY: CBCT scans and stereophotographic images from 29 patients were used for this study. Two 3-D images corresponding to the skin and bone were extracted from the CBCT data. The 3-D photo was superimposed on the CBCT skin image using relatively immobile areas of the face as a reference. 3-D colour maps were used to assess the accuracy of superimposition were distance differences between the CBCT and 3-D photo were recorded as the signed average and the Root Mean Square (RMS) error. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The signed average and RMS of the distance differences between the registered surfaces were −0.018 (±0.129) mm and 0.739 (±0.239) mm respectively. The most errors were found in areas surrounding the lips and the eyes, while minimal errors were noted in the forehead, root of the nose and zygoma. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT and 3-D photographic data can be successfully fused with minimal errors. When compared to RMS, the signed average was found to under-represent the registration error. The virtual 3-D composite craniofacial models permit concurrent assessment of bone and soft tissues during diagnosis and treatment planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3501455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35014552012-11-26 How Accurate Are the Fusion of Cone-Beam CT and 3-D Stereophotographic Images? Jayaratne, Yasas S. N. McGrath, Colman P. J. Zwahlen, Roger A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and stereophotography are two of the latest imaging modalities available for three-dimensional (3-D) visualization of craniofacial structures. However, CBCT provides only limited information on surface texture. This can be overcome by combining the bone images derived from CBCT with 3-D photographs. The objectives of this study were 1) to evaluate the feasibility of integrating 3-D Photos and CBCT images 2) to assess degree of error that may occur during the above processes and 3) to identify facial regions that would be most appropriate for 3-D image registration. METHODOLOGY: CBCT scans and stereophotographic images from 29 patients were used for this study. Two 3-D images corresponding to the skin and bone were extracted from the CBCT data. The 3-D photo was superimposed on the CBCT skin image using relatively immobile areas of the face as a reference. 3-D colour maps were used to assess the accuracy of superimposition were distance differences between the CBCT and 3-D photo were recorded as the signed average and the Root Mean Square (RMS) error. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The signed average and RMS of the distance differences between the registered surfaces were −0.018 (±0.129) mm and 0.739 (±0.239) mm respectively. The most errors were found in areas surrounding the lips and the eyes, while minimal errors were noted in the forehead, root of the nose and zygoma. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT and 3-D photographic data can be successfully fused with minimal errors. When compared to RMS, the signed average was found to under-represent the registration error. The virtual 3-D composite craniofacial models permit concurrent assessment of bone and soft tissues during diagnosis and treatment planning. Public Library of Science 2012-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3501455/ /pubmed/23185372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049585 Text en © 2012 Jayaratne et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jayaratne, Yasas S. N.
McGrath, Colman P. J.
Zwahlen, Roger A.
How Accurate Are the Fusion of Cone-Beam CT and 3-D Stereophotographic Images?
title How Accurate Are the Fusion of Cone-Beam CT and 3-D Stereophotographic Images?
title_full How Accurate Are the Fusion of Cone-Beam CT and 3-D Stereophotographic Images?
title_fullStr How Accurate Are the Fusion of Cone-Beam CT and 3-D Stereophotographic Images?
title_full_unstemmed How Accurate Are the Fusion of Cone-Beam CT and 3-D Stereophotographic Images?
title_short How Accurate Are the Fusion of Cone-Beam CT and 3-D Stereophotographic Images?
title_sort how accurate are the fusion of cone-beam ct and 3-d stereophotographic images?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3501455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049585
work_keys_str_mv AT jayaratneyasassn howaccuratearethefusionofconebeamctand3dstereophotographicimages
AT mcgrathcolmanpj howaccuratearethefusionofconebeamctand3dstereophotographicimages
AT zwahlenrogera howaccuratearethefusionofconebeamctand3dstereophotographicimages