Cargando…
Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision
We studied whether vision can teach touch to the same extent as touch seems to teach vision. In a 2 × 2 between-participants learning study, we artificially correlated visual gloss cues with haptic compliance cues. In two “natural” tasks, we tested whether visual gloss estimations have an influence...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3501647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23181012 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2012.00105 |
_version_ | 1782250214971670528 |
---|---|
author | Wismeijer, Dagmar A. Gegenfurtner, Karl R. Drewing, Knut |
author_facet | Wismeijer, Dagmar A. Gegenfurtner, Karl R. Drewing, Knut |
author_sort | Wismeijer, Dagmar A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We studied whether vision can teach touch to the same extent as touch seems to teach vision. In a 2 × 2 between-participants learning study, we artificially correlated visual gloss cues with haptic compliance cues. In two “natural” tasks, we tested whether visual gloss estimations have an influence on haptic estimations of softness and vice versa. In two “novel” tasks, in which participants were either asked to haptically judge glossiness or to visually judge softness, we investigated how perceptual estimates transfer from one sense to the other. Our results showed that vision does not teach touch as efficient as touch seems to teach vision. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3501647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35016472012-11-23 Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision Wismeijer, Dagmar A. Gegenfurtner, Karl R. Drewing, Knut Front Integr Neurosci Neuroscience We studied whether vision can teach touch to the same extent as touch seems to teach vision. In a 2 × 2 between-participants learning study, we artificially correlated visual gloss cues with haptic compliance cues. In two “natural” tasks, we tested whether visual gloss estimations have an influence on haptic estimations of softness and vice versa. In two “novel” tasks, in which participants were either asked to haptically judge glossiness or to visually judge softness, we investigated how perceptual estimates transfer from one sense to the other. Our results showed that vision does not teach touch as efficient as touch seems to teach vision. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3501647/ /pubmed/23181012 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2012.00105 Text en Copyright © 2012 Wismeijer, Gegenfurtner and Drewing. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Wismeijer, Dagmar A. Gegenfurtner, Karl R. Drewing, Knut Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision |
title | Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision |
title_full | Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision |
title_fullStr | Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision |
title_full_unstemmed | Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision |
title_short | Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision |
title_sort | learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3501647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23181012 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2012.00105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wismeijerdagmara learningfromvisiontotouchisdifferentthanlearningfromtouchtovision AT gegenfurtnerkarlr learningfromvisiontotouchisdifferentthanlearningfromtouchtovision AT drewingknut learningfromvisiontotouchisdifferentthanlearningfromtouchtovision |