Cargando…
Re-challenge with pemetrexed in advanced mesothelioma: a multi-institutional experience
BACKGROUND: Although first-line therapy for patients affected by advanced mesothelioma is well established, there is a lack of data regarding the impact of second-line treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of patients affected by advanced mesothelioma, already treated with first-line...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22943698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-482 |
_version_ | 1782250265652494336 |
---|---|
author | Bearz, Alessandra Talamini, Renato Rossoni, Gilda Santo, Antonio de Pangher, Vincenzo Fasola, Gianpiero Rosetti, Francesco Favaretto, Adolfo Gregorc, Vanesa Berretta, Massimiliano Santarossa, Sandra Berto, Eleonora Tirelli, Umberto |
author_facet | Bearz, Alessandra Talamini, Renato Rossoni, Gilda Santo, Antonio de Pangher, Vincenzo Fasola, Gianpiero Rosetti, Francesco Favaretto, Adolfo Gregorc, Vanesa Berretta, Massimiliano Santarossa, Sandra Berto, Eleonora Tirelli, Umberto |
author_sort | Bearz, Alessandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although first-line therapy for patients affected by advanced mesothelioma is well established, there is a lack of data regarding the impact of second-line treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of patients affected by advanced mesothelioma, already treated with first-line therapy based on pemetrexed and platin, with a response (partial response or stable disease) lasting at least 6 months, and re-treated with a pemetrexed-based therapy at progression. The primary objective was to describe time to progression and overall survival after re-treatment. RESULTS: Overall across several Italian oncological Institutions we found 30 patients affected by advanced mesothelioma, in progression after a 6-month lasting clinical benefit following a first-line treatment with cisplatin and pemetrexed, and re-challenged with a pemetrexed-based therapy. In these patients we found a disease control rate of 66%, with reduction of pain in 43% of patients. Overall time to progression and survival were promising for a second-line setting of patients with advanced mesothelioma, being 5.1 and 13.6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our opinion, when a patient has a long-lasting benefit from previous treatment with pemetrexed combined with a platin compound, the same treatment should be offered at progression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3502102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35021022012-11-21 Re-challenge with pemetrexed in advanced mesothelioma: a multi-institutional experience Bearz, Alessandra Talamini, Renato Rossoni, Gilda Santo, Antonio de Pangher, Vincenzo Fasola, Gianpiero Rosetti, Francesco Favaretto, Adolfo Gregorc, Vanesa Berretta, Massimiliano Santarossa, Sandra Berto, Eleonora Tirelli, Umberto BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Although first-line therapy for patients affected by advanced mesothelioma is well established, there is a lack of data regarding the impact of second-line treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of patients affected by advanced mesothelioma, already treated with first-line therapy based on pemetrexed and platin, with a response (partial response or stable disease) lasting at least 6 months, and re-treated with a pemetrexed-based therapy at progression. The primary objective was to describe time to progression and overall survival after re-treatment. RESULTS: Overall across several Italian oncological Institutions we found 30 patients affected by advanced mesothelioma, in progression after a 6-month lasting clinical benefit following a first-line treatment with cisplatin and pemetrexed, and re-challenged with a pemetrexed-based therapy. In these patients we found a disease control rate of 66%, with reduction of pain in 43% of patients. Overall time to progression and survival were promising for a second-line setting of patients with advanced mesothelioma, being 5.1 and 13.6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our opinion, when a patient has a long-lasting benefit from previous treatment with pemetrexed combined with a platin compound, the same treatment should be offered at progression. BioMed Central 2012-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3502102/ /pubmed/22943698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-482 Text en Copyright ©2012 Bearz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bearz, Alessandra Talamini, Renato Rossoni, Gilda Santo, Antonio de Pangher, Vincenzo Fasola, Gianpiero Rosetti, Francesco Favaretto, Adolfo Gregorc, Vanesa Berretta, Massimiliano Santarossa, Sandra Berto, Eleonora Tirelli, Umberto Re-challenge with pemetrexed in advanced mesothelioma: a multi-institutional experience |
title | Re-challenge with pemetrexed in advanced mesothelioma: a multi-institutional experience |
title_full | Re-challenge with pemetrexed in advanced mesothelioma: a multi-institutional experience |
title_fullStr | Re-challenge with pemetrexed in advanced mesothelioma: a multi-institutional experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Re-challenge with pemetrexed in advanced mesothelioma: a multi-institutional experience |
title_short | Re-challenge with pemetrexed in advanced mesothelioma: a multi-institutional experience |
title_sort | re-challenge with pemetrexed in advanced mesothelioma: a multi-institutional experience |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22943698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-482 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bearzalessandra rechallengewithpemetrexedinadvancedmesotheliomaamultiinstitutionalexperience AT talaminirenato rechallengewithpemetrexedinadvancedmesotheliomaamultiinstitutionalexperience AT rossonigilda rechallengewithpemetrexedinadvancedmesotheliomaamultiinstitutionalexperience AT santoantonio rechallengewithpemetrexedinadvancedmesotheliomaamultiinstitutionalexperience AT depanghervincenzo rechallengewithpemetrexedinadvancedmesotheliomaamultiinstitutionalexperience AT fasolagianpiero rechallengewithpemetrexedinadvancedmesotheliomaamultiinstitutionalexperience AT rosettifrancesco rechallengewithpemetrexedinadvancedmesotheliomaamultiinstitutionalexperience AT favarettoadolfo rechallengewithpemetrexedinadvancedmesotheliomaamultiinstitutionalexperience AT gregorcvanesa rechallengewithpemetrexedinadvancedmesotheliomaamultiinstitutionalexperience AT berrettamassimiliano rechallengewithpemetrexedinadvancedmesotheliomaamultiinstitutionalexperience AT santarossasandra rechallengewithpemetrexedinadvancedmesotheliomaamultiinstitutionalexperience AT bertoeleonora rechallengewithpemetrexedinadvancedmesotheliomaamultiinstitutionalexperience AT tirelliumberto rechallengewithpemetrexedinadvancedmesotheliomaamultiinstitutionalexperience |