Cargando…

The reliability of a portable clinical force plate used for the assessment of static postural control: repeated measures reliability study

BACKGROUND: Force plates are frequently used for postural control assessments but they are expensive and not widely available in most clinical settings. Increasingly, clinicians are using this technology to assess patients, however, the psychometric properties of these less sophisticated force plate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Golriz, Samira, Hebert, Jeffrey J, Foreman, K Bo, Walker, Bruce F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22620678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-709X-20-14
_version_ 1782250272649641984
author Golriz, Samira
Hebert, Jeffrey J
Foreman, K Bo
Walker, Bruce F
author_facet Golriz, Samira
Hebert, Jeffrey J
Foreman, K Bo
Walker, Bruce F
author_sort Golriz, Samira
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Force plates are frequently used for postural control assessments but they are expensive and not widely available in most clinical settings. Increasingly, clinicians are using this technology to assess patients, however, the psychometric properties of these less sophisticated force plates is frequently unknown. The purposes of the study were to examine the test-retest reliability of a force plate commonly used by clinicians and to explore the effect of using the mean value from multiple repetitions on reliability. METHODS: Thirty healthy volunteer adults were recruited. Postural control measures were obtained using the Midot Posture Scale Analyzer (MPSA). Data were collected in 2 sessions. Five successive repetitions each of 60 seconds duration were obtained from each participant in each session. RESULTS: The reliability coefficients obtained using single measures were low (ICC(3,1) = 0.06 to 0.53). The average of two measures allowed for reliable measurements of COP mean velocity and average location of COP. The average of three and five measures was required to obtain acceptable reliability (ICC ≥ 0.70) of relative weight bearing on legs and sway area, respectively. Higher measurement precision values were seen by averaging four or five repetitions for all variables. CONCLUSION: Single measures did not provide reliable estimates of postural sway, and the averaging of multiple repetitions was necessary to achieve acceptable levels of measurement error. The number of repetitions required to achieve reliable data ranged from 2 to 5. Clinicians should be wary of using single measures derived from similar equipment when making decisions about patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3502132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35021322012-11-21 The reliability of a portable clinical force plate used for the assessment of static postural control: repeated measures reliability study Golriz, Samira Hebert, Jeffrey J Foreman, K Bo Walker, Bruce F Chiropr Man Therap Research BACKGROUND: Force plates are frequently used for postural control assessments but they are expensive and not widely available in most clinical settings. Increasingly, clinicians are using this technology to assess patients, however, the psychometric properties of these less sophisticated force plates is frequently unknown. The purposes of the study were to examine the test-retest reliability of a force plate commonly used by clinicians and to explore the effect of using the mean value from multiple repetitions on reliability. METHODS: Thirty healthy volunteer adults were recruited. Postural control measures were obtained using the Midot Posture Scale Analyzer (MPSA). Data were collected in 2 sessions. Five successive repetitions each of 60 seconds duration were obtained from each participant in each session. RESULTS: The reliability coefficients obtained using single measures were low (ICC(3,1) = 0.06 to 0.53). The average of two measures allowed for reliable measurements of COP mean velocity and average location of COP. The average of three and five measures was required to obtain acceptable reliability (ICC ≥ 0.70) of relative weight bearing on legs and sway area, respectively. Higher measurement precision values were seen by averaging four or five repetitions for all variables. CONCLUSION: Single measures did not provide reliable estimates of postural sway, and the averaging of multiple repetitions was necessary to achieve acceptable levels of measurement error. The number of repetitions required to achieve reliable data ranged from 2 to 5. Clinicians should be wary of using single measures derived from similar equipment when making decisions about patients. BioMed Central 2012-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3502132/ /pubmed/22620678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-709X-20-14 Text en Copyright ©2012 Golriz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Golriz, Samira
Hebert, Jeffrey J
Foreman, K Bo
Walker, Bruce F
The reliability of a portable clinical force plate used for the assessment of static postural control: repeated measures reliability study
title The reliability of a portable clinical force plate used for the assessment of static postural control: repeated measures reliability study
title_full The reliability of a portable clinical force plate used for the assessment of static postural control: repeated measures reliability study
title_fullStr The reliability of a portable clinical force plate used for the assessment of static postural control: repeated measures reliability study
title_full_unstemmed The reliability of a portable clinical force plate used for the assessment of static postural control: repeated measures reliability study
title_short The reliability of a portable clinical force plate used for the assessment of static postural control: repeated measures reliability study
title_sort reliability of a portable clinical force plate used for the assessment of static postural control: repeated measures reliability study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22620678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-709X-20-14
work_keys_str_mv AT golrizsamira thereliabilityofaportableclinicalforceplateusedfortheassessmentofstaticposturalcontrolrepeatedmeasuresreliabilitystudy
AT hebertjeffreyj thereliabilityofaportableclinicalforceplateusedfortheassessmentofstaticposturalcontrolrepeatedmeasuresreliabilitystudy
AT foremankbo thereliabilityofaportableclinicalforceplateusedfortheassessmentofstaticposturalcontrolrepeatedmeasuresreliabilitystudy
AT walkerbrucef thereliabilityofaportableclinicalforceplateusedfortheassessmentofstaticposturalcontrolrepeatedmeasuresreliabilitystudy
AT golrizsamira reliabilityofaportableclinicalforceplateusedfortheassessmentofstaticposturalcontrolrepeatedmeasuresreliabilitystudy
AT hebertjeffreyj reliabilityofaportableclinicalforceplateusedfortheassessmentofstaticposturalcontrolrepeatedmeasuresreliabilitystudy
AT foremankbo reliabilityofaportableclinicalforceplateusedfortheassessmentofstaticposturalcontrolrepeatedmeasuresreliabilitystudy
AT walkerbrucef reliabilityofaportableclinicalforceplateusedfortheassessmentofstaticposturalcontrolrepeatedmeasuresreliabilitystudy