Cargando…
Bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial
BACKGROUND: The randomized phase 3 LYM3001 trial in relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) demonstrated higher overall (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab. We report findings in high-risk patients (FL Internationa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23088650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-5-67 |
_version_ | 1782250276409835520 |
---|---|
author | Zinzani, Pier Luigi Khuageva, Nuriet K Wang, Huaqing Garicochea, Bernardo Walewski, Jan Van Hoof, Achiel Soubeyran, Pierre Caballero, Dolores Buckstein, Rena Esseltine, Dixie-Lee Theocharous, Panteli Enny, Christopher Zhu, Eugene Elsayed, Yusri A Coiffier, Bertrand |
author_facet | Zinzani, Pier Luigi Khuageva, Nuriet K Wang, Huaqing Garicochea, Bernardo Walewski, Jan Van Hoof, Achiel Soubeyran, Pierre Caballero, Dolores Buckstein, Rena Esseltine, Dixie-Lee Theocharous, Panteli Enny, Christopher Zhu, Eugene Elsayed, Yusri A Coiffier, Bertrand |
author_sort | Zinzani, Pier Luigi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The randomized phase 3 LYM3001 trial in relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) demonstrated higher overall (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab. We report findings in high-risk patients (FL International Prognostic Index [FLIPI] score ≥3, and high tumor burden by modified Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomas Folliculaires [GELF] criteria). METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with grade 1/2 FL, ≥1 measurable lesion, and documented relapse or progression following prior therapy, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive, were enrolled at 164 centers in 29 countries across Europe, the Americas, and Asia-Pacific. Patients were randomized (1:1) to five 5-week cycles of bortezomib-rituximab (bortezomib 1.6 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, 15, and 22, all cycles; rituximab 375 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, 15, and 22, cycle 1, and day 1, cycles 2–5; N=336) or rituximab alone (N=340). Randomization was stratified by FLIPI score, prior rituximab, time since last dose of anti-lymphoma therapy, and geographical region. The primary endpoint of the study was PFS. RESULTS: 103 bortezomib-rituximab and 98 rituximab patients had high-risk FL. The ORR was 59% versus 37% (p=0.002), the CR/CRu rate was 13% versus 6% (p=0.145), and the durable response rate was 45% versus 26% (p=0.008) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab. Median PFS was 9.5 versus 6.7 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.667, p=0.012) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab; median time to progression was 10.9 versus 6.8 months (HR 0.656, p=0.009); median time to next anti-lymphoma treatment was 14.8 versus 9.1 months (HR 0.762, p=0.103); and the 1-year Overall Survival rate was 83.1% versus 76.6%. Overall, 51% of bortezomib-rituximab and 32% of rituximab patients reported grade ≥3 adverse events, including neutropenia (18%, 6%), anemia (4%, 5%), diarrhea (8%, 0%), thrombocytopenia (5%, 2%), and sensory neuropathy (1%, 0%). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk FL patients treated with bortezomib-rituximab had significantly higher ORR and longer PFS than patients receiving rituximab alone, with greater clinical benefit than in the overall study population; additional toxicity was acceptable and did not affect treatment feasibility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The phase 3 LYM3001 trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, with the identifier NCT00312845. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3502148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35021482012-11-21 Bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial Zinzani, Pier Luigi Khuageva, Nuriet K Wang, Huaqing Garicochea, Bernardo Walewski, Jan Van Hoof, Achiel Soubeyran, Pierre Caballero, Dolores Buckstein, Rena Esseltine, Dixie-Lee Theocharous, Panteli Enny, Christopher Zhu, Eugene Elsayed, Yusri A Coiffier, Bertrand J Hematol Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The randomized phase 3 LYM3001 trial in relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) demonstrated higher overall (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab. We report findings in high-risk patients (FL International Prognostic Index [FLIPI] score ≥3, and high tumor burden by modified Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomas Folliculaires [GELF] criteria). METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with grade 1/2 FL, ≥1 measurable lesion, and documented relapse or progression following prior therapy, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive, were enrolled at 164 centers in 29 countries across Europe, the Americas, and Asia-Pacific. Patients were randomized (1:1) to five 5-week cycles of bortezomib-rituximab (bortezomib 1.6 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, 15, and 22, all cycles; rituximab 375 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, 15, and 22, cycle 1, and day 1, cycles 2–5; N=336) or rituximab alone (N=340). Randomization was stratified by FLIPI score, prior rituximab, time since last dose of anti-lymphoma therapy, and geographical region. The primary endpoint of the study was PFS. RESULTS: 103 bortezomib-rituximab and 98 rituximab patients had high-risk FL. The ORR was 59% versus 37% (p=0.002), the CR/CRu rate was 13% versus 6% (p=0.145), and the durable response rate was 45% versus 26% (p=0.008) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab. Median PFS was 9.5 versus 6.7 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.667, p=0.012) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab; median time to progression was 10.9 versus 6.8 months (HR 0.656, p=0.009); median time to next anti-lymphoma treatment was 14.8 versus 9.1 months (HR 0.762, p=0.103); and the 1-year Overall Survival rate was 83.1% versus 76.6%. Overall, 51% of bortezomib-rituximab and 32% of rituximab patients reported grade ≥3 adverse events, including neutropenia (18%, 6%), anemia (4%, 5%), diarrhea (8%, 0%), thrombocytopenia (5%, 2%), and sensory neuropathy (1%, 0%). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk FL patients treated with bortezomib-rituximab had significantly higher ORR and longer PFS than patients receiving rituximab alone, with greater clinical benefit than in the overall study population; additional toxicity was acceptable and did not affect treatment feasibility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The phase 3 LYM3001 trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, with the identifier NCT00312845. BioMed Central 2012-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3502148/ /pubmed/23088650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-5-67 Text en Copyright ©2012 Zinzani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Zinzani, Pier Luigi Khuageva, Nuriet K Wang, Huaqing Garicochea, Bernardo Walewski, Jan Van Hoof, Achiel Soubeyran, Pierre Caballero, Dolores Buckstein, Rena Esseltine, Dixie-Lee Theocharous, Panteli Enny, Christopher Zhu, Eugene Elsayed, Yusri A Coiffier, Bertrand Bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial |
title | Bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial |
title_full | Bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial |
title_fullStr | Bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial |
title_short | Bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial |
title_sort | bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23088650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-5-67 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zinzanipierluigi bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial AT khuagevanurietk bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial AT wanghuaqing bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial AT garicocheabernardo bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial AT walewskijan bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial AT vanhoofachiel bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial AT soubeyranpierre bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial AT caballerodolores bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial AT bucksteinrena bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial AT esseltinedixielee bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial AT theocharouspanteli bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial AT ennychristopher bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial AT zhueugene bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial AT elsayedyusria bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial AT coiffierbertrand bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial |