Cargando…

Bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND: The randomized phase 3 LYM3001 trial in relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) demonstrated higher overall (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab. We report findings in high-risk patients (FL Internationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zinzani, Pier Luigi, Khuageva, Nuriet K, Wang, Huaqing, Garicochea, Bernardo, Walewski, Jan, Van Hoof, Achiel, Soubeyran, Pierre, Caballero, Dolores, Buckstein, Rena, Esseltine, Dixie-Lee, Theocharous, Panteli, Enny, Christopher, Zhu, Eugene, Elsayed, Yusri A, Coiffier, Bertrand
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23088650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-5-67
_version_ 1782250276409835520
author Zinzani, Pier Luigi
Khuageva, Nuriet K
Wang, Huaqing
Garicochea, Bernardo
Walewski, Jan
Van Hoof, Achiel
Soubeyran, Pierre
Caballero, Dolores
Buckstein, Rena
Esseltine, Dixie-Lee
Theocharous, Panteli
Enny, Christopher
Zhu, Eugene
Elsayed, Yusri A
Coiffier, Bertrand
author_facet Zinzani, Pier Luigi
Khuageva, Nuriet K
Wang, Huaqing
Garicochea, Bernardo
Walewski, Jan
Van Hoof, Achiel
Soubeyran, Pierre
Caballero, Dolores
Buckstein, Rena
Esseltine, Dixie-Lee
Theocharous, Panteli
Enny, Christopher
Zhu, Eugene
Elsayed, Yusri A
Coiffier, Bertrand
author_sort Zinzani, Pier Luigi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The randomized phase 3 LYM3001 trial in relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) demonstrated higher overall (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab. We report findings in high-risk patients (FL International Prognostic Index [FLIPI] score ≥3, and high tumor burden by modified Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomas Folliculaires [GELF] criteria). METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with grade 1/2 FL, ≥1 measurable lesion, and documented relapse or progression following prior therapy, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive, were enrolled at 164 centers in 29 countries across Europe, the Americas, and Asia-Pacific. Patients were randomized (1:1) to five 5-week cycles of bortezomib-rituximab (bortezomib 1.6 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, 15, and 22, all cycles; rituximab 375 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, 15, and 22, cycle 1, and day 1, cycles 2–5; N=336) or rituximab alone (N=340). Randomization was stratified by FLIPI score, prior rituximab, time since last dose of anti-lymphoma therapy, and geographical region. The primary endpoint of the study was PFS. RESULTS: 103 bortezomib-rituximab and 98 rituximab patients had high-risk FL. The ORR was 59% versus 37% (p=0.002), the CR/CRu rate was 13% versus 6% (p=0.145), and the durable response rate was 45% versus 26% (p=0.008) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab. Median PFS was 9.5 versus 6.7 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.667, p=0.012) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab; median time to progression was 10.9 versus 6.8 months (HR 0.656, p=0.009); median time to next anti-lymphoma treatment was 14.8 versus 9.1 months (HR 0.762, p=0.103); and the 1-year Overall Survival rate was 83.1% versus 76.6%. Overall, 51% of bortezomib-rituximab and 32% of rituximab patients reported grade ≥3 adverse events, including neutropenia (18%, 6%), anemia (4%, 5%), diarrhea (8%, 0%), thrombocytopenia (5%, 2%), and sensory neuropathy (1%, 0%). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk FL patients treated with bortezomib-rituximab had significantly higher ORR and longer PFS than patients receiving rituximab alone, with greater clinical benefit than in the overall study population; additional toxicity was acceptable and did not affect treatment feasibility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The phase 3 LYM3001 trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, with the identifier NCT00312845.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3502148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35021482012-11-21 Bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial Zinzani, Pier Luigi Khuageva, Nuriet K Wang, Huaqing Garicochea, Bernardo Walewski, Jan Van Hoof, Achiel Soubeyran, Pierre Caballero, Dolores Buckstein, Rena Esseltine, Dixie-Lee Theocharous, Panteli Enny, Christopher Zhu, Eugene Elsayed, Yusri A Coiffier, Bertrand J Hematol Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The randomized phase 3 LYM3001 trial in relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) demonstrated higher overall (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab. We report findings in high-risk patients (FL International Prognostic Index [FLIPI] score ≥3, and high tumor burden by modified Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomas Folliculaires [GELF] criteria). METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with grade 1/2 FL, ≥1 measurable lesion, and documented relapse or progression following prior therapy, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive, were enrolled at 164 centers in 29 countries across Europe, the Americas, and Asia-Pacific. Patients were randomized (1:1) to five 5-week cycles of bortezomib-rituximab (bortezomib 1.6 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, 15, and 22, all cycles; rituximab 375 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, 15, and 22, cycle 1, and day 1, cycles 2–5; N=336) or rituximab alone (N=340). Randomization was stratified by FLIPI score, prior rituximab, time since last dose of anti-lymphoma therapy, and geographical region. The primary endpoint of the study was PFS. RESULTS: 103 bortezomib-rituximab and 98 rituximab patients had high-risk FL. The ORR was 59% versus 37% (p=0.002), the CR/CRu rate was 13% versus 6% (p=0.145), and the durable response rate was 45% versus 26% (p=0.008) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab. Median PFS was 9.5 versus 6.7 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.667, p=0.012) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab; median time to progression was 10.9 versus 6.8 months (HR 0.656, p=0.009); median time to next anti-lymphoma treatment was 14.8 versus 9.1 months (HR 0.762, p=0.103); and the 1-year Overall Survival rate was 83.1% versus 76.6%. Overall, 51% of bortezomib-rituximab and 32% of rituximab patients reported grade ≥3 adverse events, including neutropenia (18%, 6%), anemia (4%, 5%), diarrhea (8%, 0%), thrombocytopenia (5%, 2%), and sensory neuropathy (1%, 0%). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk FL patients treated with bortezomib-rituximab had significantly higher ORR and longer PFS than patients receiving rituximab alone, with greater clinical benefit than in the overall study population; additional toxicity was acceptable and did not affect treatment feasibility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The phase 3 LYM3001 trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, with the identifier NCT00312845. BioMed Central 2012-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3502148/ /pubmed/23088650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-5-67 Text en Copyright ©2012 Zinzani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Zinzani, Pier Luigi
Khuageva, Nuriet K
Wang, Huaqing
Garicochea, Bernardo
Walewski, Jan
Van Hoof, Achiel
Soubeyran, Pierre
Caballero, Dolores
Buckstein, Rena
Esseltine, Dixie-Lee
Theocharous, Panteli
Enny, Christopher
Zhu, Eugene
Elsayed, Yusri A
Coiffier, Bertrand
Bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial
title Bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial
title_full Bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial
title_fullStr Bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial
title_full_unstemmed Bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial
title_short Bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial
title_sort bortezomib plus rituximab versus rituximab in patients with high-risk, relapsed, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive follicular lymphoma: subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23088650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-8722-5-67
work_keys_str_mv AT zinzanipierluigi bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial
AT khuagevanurietk bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial
AT wanghuaqing bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial
AT garicocheabernardo bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial
AT walewskijan bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial
AT vanhoofachiel bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial
AT soubeyranpierre bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial
AT caballerodolores bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial
AT bucksteinrena bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial
AT esseltinedixielee bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial
AT theocharouspanteli bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial
AT ennychristopher bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial
AT zhueugene bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial
AT elsayedyusria bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial
AT coiffierbertrand bortezomibplusrituximabversusrituximabinpatientswithhighriskrelapsedrituximabnaiveorrituximabsensitivefollicularlymphomasubgroupanalysisofarandomizedphase3trial