Cargando…

Personal preferences and discordant prostate cancer treatment choice in an intervention trial of men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (LPC) can choose from multiple treatment regimens and are faced with a decision in which medical factors and personal preferences are important. The Personal Patient Profile-Prostate (P3P) is a computerized decision aid for men with LPC that f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosco, Jaclyn LF, Halpenny, Barbara, Berry, Donna L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23021156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-123
_version_ 1782250286899789824
author Bosco, Jaclyn LF
Halpenny, Barbara
Berry, Donna L
author_facet Bosco, Jaclyn LF
Halpenny, Barbara
Berry, Donna L
author_sort Bosco, Jaclyn LF
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (LPC) can choose from multiple treatment regimens and are faced with a decision in which medical factors and personal preferences are important. The Personal Patient Profile-Prostate (P3P) is a computerized decision aid for men with LPC that focuses on personal preferences. We determined whether the P3P intervention improved the concordance of treatment choice with self-reported influential side-effects compared with a control group. METHODS: English/Spanish-speaking men diagnosed with LPC (2007–2009) from four US cities were enrolled into a randomized trial and followed through 6-months via mailed or online questionnaire. Men were randomized to receive the P3P intervention or standard education plus links to reputable websites. We classified choice as concordant if men were concerned with (a) sexual function and chose external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy, (b) bowel function and chose prostatectomy, (c) sex, bowel, and/or bladder function and chose active surveillance, or (d) not concerned with any side effect and chose any treatment. Using logistic regression, we calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between the P3P intervention and concordance. RESULTS: Of 448 men, most were <65 years, non-Hispanic white, had multiple physician consultations prior to enrollment, and chose a treatment discordant with concerns about potential side effects. There was no significant difference in concordance between the intervention (45%) and control (50%) group (OR = 0.82; 95%CI = 0.56, 1.2). CONCLUSIONS: The P3P intervention did not improve concordance between potential side effects and treatment choice. Information and/or physician consultation immediately after diagnosis was likely to influence decisions despite concerns about side effects. The intervention may be more effective before the first treatment options consultation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00692653 http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00692653
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3502193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35021932012-11-21 Personal preferences and discordant prostate cancer treatment choice in an intervention trial of men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer Bosco, Jaclyn LF Halpenny, Barbara Berry, Donna L Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (LPC) can choose from multiple treatment regimens and are faced with a decision in which medical factors and personal preferences are important. The Personal Patient Profile-Prostate (P3P) is a computerized decision aid for men with LPC that focuses on personal preferences. We determined whether the P3P intervention improved the concordance of treatment choice with self-reported influential side-effects compared with a control group. METHODS: English/Spanish-speaking men diagnosed with LPC (2007–2009) from four US cities were enrolled into a randomized trial and followed through 6-months via mailed or online questionnaire. Men were randomized to receive the P3P intervention or standard education plus links to reputable websites. We classified choice as concordant if men were concerned with (a) sexual function and chose external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy, (b) bowel function and chose prostatectomy, (c) sex, bowel, and/or bladder function and chose active surveillance, or (d) not concerned with any side effect and chose any treatment. Using logistic regression, we calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between the P3P intervention and concordance. RESULTS: Of 448 men, most were <65 years, non-Hispanic white, had multiple physician consultations prior to enrollment, and chose a treatment discordant with concerns about potential side effects. There was no significant difference in concordance between the intervention (45%) and control (50%) group (OR = 0.82; 95%CI = 0.56, 1.2). CONCLUSIONS: The P3P intervention did not improve concordance between potential side effects and treatment choice. Information and/or physician consultation immediately after diagnosis was likely to influence decisions despite concerns about side effects. The intervention may be more effective before the first treatment options consultation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00692653 http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00692653 BioMed Central 2012-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3502193/ /pubmed/23021156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-123 Text en Copyright ©2012 Bosco et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Bosco, Jaclyn LF
Halpenny, Barbara
Berry, Donna L
Personal preferences and discordant prostate cancer treatment choice in an intervention trial of men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer
title Personal preferences and discordant prostate cancer treatment choice in an intervention trial of men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer
title_full Personal preferences and discordant prostate cancer treatment choice in an intervention trial of men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer
title_fullStr Personal preferences and discordant prostate cancer treatment choice in an intervention trial of men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Personal preferences and discordant prostate cancer treatment choice in an intervention trial of men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer
title_short Personal preferences and discordant prostate cancer treatment choice in an intervention trial of men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer
title_sort personal preferences and discordant prostate cancer treatment choice in an intervention trial of men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23021156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-123
work_keys_str_mv AT boscojaclynlf personalpreferencesanddiscordantprostatecancertreatmentchoiceinaninterventiontrialofmennewlydiagnosedwithlocalizedprostatecancer
AT halpennybarbara personalpreferencesanddiscordantprostatecancertreatmentchoiceinaninterventiontrialofmennewlydiagnosedwithlocalizedprostatecancer
AT berrydonnal personalpreferencesanddiscordantprostatecancertreatmentchoiceinaninterventiontrialofmennewlydiagnosedwithlocalizedprostatecancer