Cargando…

Predicting necrosis in residual mass analysis after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated that pathological analysis of retroperitoneal residual masses of patients with testicular germ cell tumors revealed findings of necrotic debris or fibrosis in up to 50% of patients. We aimed at pursuing a clinical and pathological review of patients under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miranda, Eduardo de Paula, Abe, Daniel Kanda, Nesrallah, Adriano João, dos Reis, Sabrina Thalita, Crippa, Alexandre, Srougi, Miguel, Dall’Oglio, Marcos Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23021209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-10-203
_version_ 1782250300575318016
author Miranda, Eduardo de Paula
Abe, Daniel Kanda
Nesrallah, Adriano João
dos Reis, Sabrina Thalita
Crippa, Alexandre
Srougi, Miguel
Dall’Oglio, Marcos Francisco
author_facet Miranda, Eduardo de Paula
Abe, Daniel Kanda
Nesrallah, Adriano João
dos Reis, Sabrina Thalita
Crippa, Alexandre
Srougi, Miguel
Dall’Oglio, Marcos Francisco
author_sort Miranda, Eduardo de Paula
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated that pathological analysis of retroperitoneal residual masses of patients with testicular germ cell tumors revealed findings of necrotic debris or fibrosis in up to 50% of patients. We aimed at pursuing a clinical and pathological review of patients undergoing post chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) in order to identify variables that may help predict necrosis in the retroperitoneum. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent PC-RPLND at the University Hospital of the University of São Paulo and Cancer Institute of Sao Paulo between January 2005 and September 2011. Clinical and pathological data were obtained and consisted basically of: measures of retroperitoneal masses, histology of the orchiectomy specimen, serum tumor marker and retroperitoneal nodal size before and after chemotherapy. RESULTS: We gathered a total of 32 patients with a mean age of 29.7; pathological analysis in our series demonstrated that 15 (47%) had necrosis in residual retroperitoneal masses, 15 had teratoma (47%) and 2 (6.4%) had viable germ cell tumors (GCT). The mean size of the retroperitoneal mass was 4.94 cm in our sample, without a difference between the groups (P = 0.176). From all studied variables, relative changes in retroperitoneal lymph node size (P = 0.04), the absence of teratoma in the orchiectomy specimen (P = 0.03) and the presence of choriocarcinoma in the testicular analysis after orchiectomy (P = 0.03) were statistically significant predictors of the presence of necrosis. A reduction level of 35% was therefore suggested to be the best cutoff for predicting the absence of tumor in the retroperitoneum with a sensitivity of 73.3% and specificity of 82.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Even though retroperitoneal lymph node dissection remains the gold standard for patients with residual masses, those without teratoma in the primary tumor and a shrinkage of 35% or more in retroperitoneal mass have a considerably smaller chance of having viable GCT or teratoma in the retroperitoneum and a surveillance program could be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3502267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35022672012-11-21 Predicting necrosis in residual mass analysis after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a retrospective study Miranda, Eduardo de Paula Abe, Daniel Kanda Nesrallah, Adriano João dos Reis, Sabrina Thalita Crippa, Alexandre Srougi, Miguel Dall’Oglio, Marcos Francisco World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated that pathological analysis of retroperitoneal residual masses of patients with testicular germ cell tumors revealed findings of necrotic debris or fibrosis in up to 50% of patients. We aimed at pursuing a clinical and pathological review of patients undergoing post chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) in order to identify variables that may help predict necrosis in the retroperitoneum. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent PC-RPLND at the University Hospital of the University of São Paulo and Cancer Institute of Sao Paulo between January 2005 and September 2011. Clinical and pathological data were obtained and consisted basically of: measures of retroperitoneal masses, histology of the orchiectomy specimen, serum tumor marker and retroperitoneal nodal size before and after chemotherapy. RESULTS: We gathered a total of 32 patients with a mean age of 29.7; pathological analysis in our series demonstrated that 15 (47%) had necrosis in residual retroperitoneal masses, 15 had teratoma (47%) and 2 (6.4%) had viable germ cell tumors (GCT). The mean size of the retroperitoneal mass was 4.94 cm in our sample, without a difference between the groups (P = 0.176). From all studied variables, relative changes in retroperitoneal lymph node size (P = 0.04), the absence of teratoma in the orchiectomy specimen (P = 0.03) and the presence of choriocarcinoma in the testicular analysis after orchiectomy (P = 0.03) were statistically significant predictors of the presence of necrosis. A reduction level of 35% was therefore suggested to be the best cutoff for predicting the absence of tumor in the retroperitoneum with a sensitivity of 73.3% and specificity of 82.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Even though retroperitoneal lymph node dissection remains the gold standard for patients with residual masses, those without teratoma in the primary tumor and a shrinkage of 35% or more in retroperitoneal mass have a considerably smaller chance of having viable GCT or teratoma in the retroperitoneum and a surveillance program could be considered. BioMed Central 2012-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3502267/ /pubmed/23021209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-10-203 Text en Copyright ©2012 Miranda et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Miranda, Eduardo de Paula
Abe, Daniel Kanda
Nesrallah, Adriano João
dos Reis, Sabrina Thalita
Crippa, Alexandre
Srougi, Miguel
Dall’Oglio, Marcos Francisco
Predicting necrosis in residual mass analysis after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a retrospective study
title Predicting necrosis in residual mass analysis after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a retrospective study
title_full Predicting necrosis in residual mass analysis after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Predicting necrosis in residual mass analysis after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Predicting necrosis in residual mass analysis after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a retrospective study
title_short Predicting necrosis in residual mass analysis after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a retrospective study
title_sort predicting necrosis in residual mass analysis after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a retrospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23021209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-10-203
work_keys_str_mv AT mirandaeduardodepaula predictingnecrosisinresidualmassanalysisafterretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionaretrospectivestudy
AT abedanielkanda predictingnecrosisinresidualmassanalysisafterretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionaretrospectivestudy
AT nesrallahadrianojoao predictingnecrosisinresidualmassanalysisafterretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionaretrospectivestudy
AT dosreissabrinathalita predictingnecrosisinresidualmassanalysisafterretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionaretrospectivestudy
AT crippaalexandre predictingnecrosisinresidualmassanalysisafterretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionaretrospectivestudy
AT srougimiguel predictingnecrosisinresidualmassanalysisafterretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionaretrospectivestudy
AT dallogliomarcosfrancisco predictingnecrosisinresidualmassanalysisafterretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionaretrospectivestudy