Cargando…
Robotic thyroidectomy versus endoscopic thyroidectomy: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: To conduct a meta-analysis to determine the relative merits of robotic thyroidectomy (RT) and endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET). METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify comparative studies reporting peri-operative outcomes for RT and ET. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and weighted m...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23140528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-10-239 |
_version_ | 1782250304088047616 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Shuang Chen, Zhi-Heng Jiang, Hong-Gang Yu, Ji-Ren |
author_facet | Lin, Shuang Chen, Zhi-Heng Jiang, Hong-Gang Yu, Ji-Ren |
author_sort | Lin, Shuang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To conduct a meta-analysis to determine the relative merits of robotic thyroidectomy (RT) and endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET). METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify comparative studies reporting peri-operative outcomes for RT and ET. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated using either a fixed-effects or a random-effects model. RESULTS: Six studies matched the selection criteria, which reported on 2048 subjects, of whom 978 underwent RT and 1070 underwent ET. Comparing the outcomes of RT with ET, this meta-analysis indicated that RT was associated with more complications (WMD = 1.51, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.94) and greater amount of drainage fluid (WMD = 17.10, 95% CI 5.69 to 28.51). Meanwhile, operating time (WMD = 1.50, 95% CI −39.59 to 42.58), conversion (WMD = 0.63, 95% CI 0.07 to 6.17), post-operative hospital stay (WMD = −0.05; 95% CI −0.18 to 0.08), and the number of lymph nodes harvested (WMD = 0.62, 95% CI −0.29 to 1.53) were similar for both procedures. CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis indicated that RT is associated with an increased risk of complications and a greater amount of drainage fluid. Therefore, RT does not appear to have any advantage over ET. Further studies are required to confirm these results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3502282 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35022822012-11-21 Robotic thyroidectomy versus endoscopic thyroidectomy: a meta-analysis Lin, Shuang Chen, Zhi-Heng Jiang, Hong-Gang Yu, Ji-Ren World J Surg Oncol Review BACKGROUND: To conduct a meta-analysis to determine the relative merits of robotic thyroidectomy (RT) and endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET). METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify comparative studies reporting peri-operative outcomes for RT and ET. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated using either a fixed-effects or a random-effects model. RESULTS: Six studies matched the selection criteria, which reported on 2048 subjects, of whom 978 underwent RT and 1070 underwent ET. Comparing the outcomes of RT with ET, this meta-analysis indicated that RT was associated with more complications (WMD = 1.51, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.94) and greater amount of drainage fluid (WMD = 17.10, 95% CI 5.69 to 28.51). Meanwhile, operating time (WMD = 1.50, 95% CI −39.59 to 42.58), conversion (WMD = 0.63, 95% CI 0.07 to 6.17), post-operative hospital stay (WMD = −0.05; 95% CI −0.18 to 0.08), and the number of lymph nodes harvested (WMD = 0.62, 95% CI −0.29 to 1.53) were similar for both procedures. CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis indicated that RT is associated with an increased risk of complications and a greater amount of drainage fluid. Therefore, RT does not appear to have any advantage over ET. Further studies are required to confirm these results. BioMed Central 2012-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3502282/ /pubmed/23140528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-10-239 Text en Copyright ©2012 Lin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Lin, Shuang Chen, Zhi-Heng Jiang, Hong-Gang Yu, Ji-Ren Robotic thyroidectomy versus endoscopic thyroidectomy: a meta-analysis |
title | Robotic thyroidectomy versus endoscopic thyroidectomy: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Robotic thyroidectomy versus endoscopic thyroidectomy: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Robotic thyroidectomy versus endoscopic thyroidectomy: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic thyroidectomy versus endoscopic thyroidectomy: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Robotic thyroidectomy versus endoscopic thyroidectomy: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | robotic thyroidectomy versus endoscopic thyroidectomy: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3502282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23140528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-10-239 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linshuang roboticthyroidectomyversusendoscopicthyroidectomyametaanalysis AT chenzhiheng roboticthyroidectomyversusendoscopicthyroidectomyametaanalysis AT jianghonggang roboticthyroidectomyversusendoscopicthyroidectomyametaanalysis AT yujiren roboticthyroidectomyversusendoscopicthyroidectomyametaanalysis |